Yeah, you are right. It is just that the opportunity for this sort of thing doesn't come up very often. Changing the subject, would you know what is going on in the K+P endgame in the "worst moves" thread?IM Jack Rudd wrote:Wrong question. It depends whether a larger number of people who would be likely to play a 9-rounder play in Easter congresses or 4NCL. I suspect the answer is the latter.
Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
-
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
I agree, and so we won't be running anything. It's a pity Kate and Wills picked the wrong dateIM Jack Rudd wrote:Wrong question. It depends whether a larger number of people who would be likely to play a 9-rounder play in Easter congresses or 4NCL. I suspect the answer is the latter.
-
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
"Anyone know if William and Kate play chess?"
I recall a newspaper article years ago that said William (and Harry) played as children - I think they were taken to a shelter for the homeless and played some of the occupants.
I recall a newspaper article years ago that said William (and Harry) played as children - I think they were taken to a shelter for the homeless and played some of the occupants.
"Kevin was the arbiter and was very patient. " Nick Grey
-
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Kevin is quite correct about William playing. A homeless person challenged Princess Diane to a game and she said she didn't play, so William accepted. This did not stop her attending the Kasparov Short match one day. Of course nobody took any notice. It is said he also joined the chess club at St Andrews. One attraction may have been nobody would have asked him anything other than, 'What is your Rating?'
Stewart Reuben
Stewart Reuben
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
How quickly we forget...Stewart Reuben wrote:A homeless person challenged Princess Diane
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
We sure do, even forget how to spell her name correctly.Alex Holowczak wrote:How quickly we forget...Stewart Reuben wrote:A homeless person challenged Princess Diane
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
That's what I was getting at.Warren Kingston wrote:We sure do, even forget how to spell her name correctly.Alex Holowczak wrote:How quickly we forget...Stewart Reuben wrote:A homeless person challenged Princess Diane
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:41 pm
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
At least one of you should try to imply that the homeless person's name is forgotten, rather than both trying to pedant bingo the e/a typo.
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
You are talking tripe Ian. There are millions of homeless people, 90% through their own fault, but they was only one Princess Diana.
Anyway, I do not not play Bingo, nevermind Pedant Bingo. I suspect Alex doesnt either.
Anyway, I do not not play Bingo, nevermind Pedant Bingo. I suspect Alex doesnt either.
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:41 pm
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
How quickly we forget...Warren Kingston wrote: but they was only one Princess Diana.
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Yes, Warren, you fool - that should have been "... there was only one Prince Diana".
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:41 pm
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Lets just hope that Steve Giddens hasn't scene it yeti.
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Jon- you imbecile- she was a Princess not a Prince
-
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Remember Tartakower's immortal aphorism.
Steuart Rubins
Steuart Rubins
-
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Royal Wedding and chess tournaments
Tsk. Not even a formal Princess (that was merely use of her husband's title of Prince and her husband's titles). To have the formal title of Princess, you need to be born into that, or be granted it by the reigning monarch.Warren Kingston wrote:Jon- you imbecile- she was a Princess not a Prince
As every school-kid knows, she was: "Her Royal Highness The Princess Charles Philip Arthur George, Princess of Wales & Countess of Chester, Duchess of Cornwall, Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Carrick, Baroness of Renfrew, Lady of the Isles, Princess of Scotland".
It's the difference between being a princess by marriage, and a "Princess of the Blood" (royal blood, obviously). Nice robes as well, apparently.