Does it give the time controls anywhere on the
website? I'd be grateful if it could - when events have different controls it's nice to be able to find out what actually applies in the event one is actually watching. (Ah yes, it's
here.)
Congratulations to everybody involved: this
is a really strong
tournament, presumably stronger than the Lloyds Bank affairs from the Nineties which to my great regret I never played in.
We still have some way to go to catch up with (for instance) Spain: I give for purposes of comparison the starting lists of two Spanish tournaments, one being my local Open,
Benasque 2008, and another being last year's
tournament in Ciudad Real (which I found almost at random when looking up the name Dan Cruz Alvarez de Ron from John Saunders' round one
report. The last of these must have really had some money to put about: how often does Anand - not to mention several others - play in an open?
Anyway, if we look at the strongest, second strongest, tenth strongest, thirtieth strongest, fiftieth strongest and hundredth strongest competitors in each....
Liverpool (of 138) 1. Adams 2735 2. Bacrot 2691 10. Baramidze 2593 30. Haslinger 2511 50. Collins 2492 100. Majer 2091
Benasque (of 547) 1. Baklan 2630 2. Burmakin 2625 10. Mamedov* 2564 30. Magem 2500 50. Alfarez 2453 100. Vishnu 2341
Ciudad Real (of 286) 1. Anand 2787 2. Mamedyarov 2757 10. Milov 2767 30. Mamedov* 2584 50. Kovchan 2527 100. GarcÃa 2317
....then if you plotted them on a curve (is anybody here sad enough to do this?) you'd get three different ones: Benasque is weakest through to number fifty but is strongest at one hundred, having a strength in depth that even Ciudad Real lacks, whereas Liverpool, almost as strong as Ciudad Real at the mid-point, is substanmitally the weakest of the three by the "end".
Hard to know precisely the reasons in each instance: conceivably the term "Spanish climate" may be of use here, although it's probable that the two Spanish tournaments had much greater finds available and were able to offer conditions to a larger number of titled players? Obviously, too, a European Championship can't by defintion invite players from outside that continent.
Anyway, it's a step from "here" to "there" and a welcome one.
[* not the same one, I think]