OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Justin Hadi

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by Justin Hadi » Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:06 pm

Not sure what Short is doing with 16...Ra7.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by JustinHorton » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:05 pm

Ooh, well done Ingrid.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by John Saunders » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:26 pm

Ingrid lost, didn't she?

The Russian plan now seems to be to neutralise the two young guns and have Kramnik nurse his small edge whilst Jakovenko goes for the point against Stuart (since 2½-1½ is good enough). It did seem strange to leave Mickey off the team for such a big match, however poorly he had played previously. Maybe he is physically under the weather. Anyone know?
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by JustinHorton » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:33 pm

John Saunders wrote:Ingrid lost, didn't she?
So she did. My apologies. It's been a long day.
John Saunders wrote:Maybe he is physically under the weather. Anyone know?
After the above, I'm not sure I can correctly identify who's playing on either side (or what game they're playing) but it did strike me that potentially it might be a health issue rather than entirely one of form. You mighbt drop your top board after two straight defeats, but even when there's been a rest day to recover?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Justin Hadi

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by Justin Hadi » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:45 pm

Short could win this ending - the g6 pawn looks difficult to grab and he might be able to put the pressure on with his knights later. I could be wrong, but we'll see.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by JustinHorton » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:47 pm

Can anybody tell me the result of Jovanka's game? I'm not currently confident of my ability to read....
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by John Saunders » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:56 pm

Jovanka's won but it looks like they are going down in the match.

Richard Jones has just beaten a GM. OK, somebody I've never heard of from Bolivia but a GM nonetheless. Should be points in the bank for the Welsh (I know this is the 'English Chess Forum' but hey...).
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by John Saunders » Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:57 pm

Sorry, it's only just dawned on me that Jovanka beat Stefanova. After beating Cmilyte in the last round. That's fantastic stuff!
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4668
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:07 pm

Jovanka won in very convincing style (as opposed to the slight element of comedy in the win v Cmilyte). Again the women impress against higher rated opposition, though I think that this time they may go down to a narrow defeat all the same.

Kramnik is certainly playing for the win, though it looks harder than it did a little while ago. But Conquest is clearly losing so the Russians look assured of their favourite scoreline, at the least. Our big chance in this match was on board three when Morozevich seemed to be making the opening up altogether and lost a pawn for very little. But Gawain it seems did not adjust (how could he have expected the world number two to play like that?!) and allowed a perpetual - still a very good result under normal circumstances but not so much in these circumstances. (Admittedly playing to win was not entirely risk free but needless to say... chess is like that. But Moro definitely had not intended to sac his e4 pawn!).

But as I said in the other thread (where we discussed Adams' absence) this was always going to be a very difficult match; and I do think that it was even harder that England had not played any remotely comparable opposition beforehand. Perhaps Gawain would have come closer to taking advantage of Moro`s play if he had played some stronger opposition over the last few days?

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by John Saunders » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:17 pm

Uh-oh - has Short really played 46...Kxa6 - sometimes the games window shows moves and then retracts them. Fingers crossed that it has done this again as it looks like Rh1-a1 is a winner for White...
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

User avatar
John Saunders
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: Kingston-upon-Thames

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by John Saunders » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:19 pm

Oh dear. Goodnight, Dresden. Looks like 1-3.
Personal Twitter @johnchess
Britbase https://www.britbase.info
(I prefer email to PM - contact me via this link - https://www.saund.org.uk/email.html)

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by JustinHorton » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:23 pm

John Saunders wrote:Uh-oh - has Short really played 46...Kxa6 - sometimes the games window shows moves and then retracts them.
It seems to do that a lot, and then reinstate the (correct) move it was showing.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Justin Hadi

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by Justin Hadi » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:31 pm

Justin Hadi wrote:Short could win this ending - the g6 pawn looks difficult to grab and he might be able to put the pressure on with his knights later. I could be wrong, but we'll see.
Oh dear.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by JustinHorton » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:32 pm

What do you reckon to Stuart's chances of saving his?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Justin Hadi

Re: OLYMPIAD 2008 :):)

Post by Justin Hadi » Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:35 pm

About zero I would say.