Very relaxing, that, and probably better for our stress levels generally than playing chess in any formatNickFaulks wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:26 amUnless you have something better to do, like popping the bubbles in leftover plastic packaging.Joey Stewart wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:08 amAnyone consistently surviving time scrambles in such a fashion needs investigating
Cheating in chess
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Cheating in chess
Round 15 of the 2021 World Blitz, Arjun Erigaisi - Parham Maghsoodloo. At 7:32 into the video, Maghsoodloo moves the bishop twice, Erigasi either doesn't notice or doesn't care and the game goes on. Maghsoodloo to give him the benefit of the doubt must have convinced himself that he hadn't taken his hand off the bishop which he clearly does.
Clearly if Erigaisi claims his opponent took his hand off it then it would have went through due process. But if he doesn't notice and there is no arbiter around then Maghsoodloo just gets away with it even thought we have the equivalent of VAR?
Justice was done anyway I guess as Erigaisi went on to win.
Clearly if Erigaisi claims his opponent took his hand off it then it would have went through due process. But if he doesn't notice and there is no arbiter around then Maghsoodloo just gets away with it even thought we have the equivalent of VAR?
Justice was done anyway I guess as Erigaisi went on to win.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
You might recall this being the problem with Aronian/Nakamura in that there is no action taken if no complaint is made. Difficult for Erigaisi: he's clearly winning as it is, and if he stops the game he has no guarantee of his complaint being upheld.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Cheating in chess
There are so many things little cheaty things that go on in time scrambles they I can think of -
Touch move violation
illegal moves
clock blocking
Knocking over pieces and leaving it for your opponent to tidy up
hiding queens to slow down/ prevent promotion
placing pawns ambiguously between squares in order to gain a free move
Over the board I feel like increments have heavily curtailed a lot of these things, and fully support them there but online most of them cannot happen and incremental time only benefits engine users so should never be used in an internet game.
Touch move violation
illegal moves
clock blocking
Knocking over pieces and leaving it for your opponent to tidy up
hiding queens to slow down/ prevent promotion
placing pawns ambiguously between squares in order to gain a free move
Over the board I feel like increments have heavily curtailed a lot of these things, and fully support them there but online most of them cannot happen and incremental time only benefits engine users so should never be used in an internet game.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 5841
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
"Knocking over pieces and leaving it for your opponent to tidy up"
I noticed Magnus knocked pieces over with a couple of seconds to go (at least twice), but immediately replaced them before touching the clock.
I noticed Magnus knocked pieces over with a couple of seconds to go (at least twice), but immediately replaced them before touching the clock.
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Cheating in chess
A few years back there was a case of a GM being disqualified for repeatedly knocking the pieces over and not resetting them before pressing the clock and then after the game people were acting like it was a terrible rule and he had been unfairly screwed but really the arbiter and opponent were totally in the right there - it even had a bad knock on effect, I was in a blitz tournament a few weeks later in a time scramble where my opponent was doing exactly the same thing and the arbiter refused to step in and apply sanctions even when I pointed out it was against the rules.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
Knocking over pieces and placing pawns (or any other piece) ambiguously could be said to not meet the relevant requirements of Articles 3.1 – 3.9, and as such are illegal moves.Joey Stewart wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:16 pmThere are so many things little cheaty things that go on in time scrambles they I can think of -
Touch move violation
illegal moves
clock blocking
Knocking over pieces and leaving it for your opponent to tidy up
hiding queens to slow down/ prevent promotion
placing pawns ambiguously between squares in order to gain a free move
I don't see the relevance of increments here. And how on earth do increments only benefit engine users?Over the board I feel like increments have heavily curtailed a lot of these things, and fully support them there but online most of them cannot happen and incremental time only benefits engine users so should never be used in an internet game.
-
- Posts: 21336
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
In on0line chess It would give that little bit of extra time to consult an external device or switch tasks on the same device. Having checked the move count after a few OTB games of 3 2, I reckon it's more equivalent to 4 0 than 5 0 as Blitz games infrequently get past move 40.Reg Clucas wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 3:51 pmI don't see the relevance of increments here. And how on earth do increments only benefit engine users?
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Cheating in chess
To a fast player online increments are effectively a time unlimited game whereas over the board you don't get a lot of change once you have removed the time it takes to make your move and hit the clock so blitz games still progress towards a natural result if someone is being too slow.
The relevance of increments to my point above was that almost every means of cheating over the board involve misplacement of the pieces via desperation/underhandedness and therefore tend not to happen once increments are applied but online the only type of cheating you really need worry about is engine use and sandbagging of which neither can be solved with incremental time and it is better for the cheats to face a hard cut off if they over stretch themselves.
The relevance of increments to my point above was that almost every means of cheating over the board involve misplacement of the pieces via desperation/underhandedness and therefore tend not to happen once increments are applied but online the only type of cheating you really need worry about is engine use and sandbagging of which neither can be solved with incremental time and it is better for the cheats to face a hard cut off if they over stretch themselves.
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
Re: Cheating in chess
Erigaisi noticed. That is clear from his body language.Chris Rice wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:17 pmRound 15 of the 2021 World Blitz, Arjun Erigaisi - Parham Maghsoodloo. At 7:32 into the video, Maghsoodloo moves the bishop twice, Erigaisi either doesn't notice or doesn't care and the game goes on. Maghsoodloo to give him the benefit of the doubt must have convinced himself that he hadn't taken his hand off the bishop which he clearly does.
Clearly if Erigaisi claims his opponent took his hand off it then it would have went through due process. But if he doesn't notice and there is no arbiter around then Maghsoodloo just gets away with it even thought we have the equivalent of VAR?
Justice was done anyway I guess as Erigaisi went on to win.
However, he may not have realised that the game was being filmed. According to the commentators, they didn't have a camera on every board.
-
- Posts: 3568
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Cheating in chess
I find it difficult to believe anyone could not realise they'd let go of a piece when their hand almost presses the clock before stopping and changing the move. The picture shows the bishop after it was moved to e7 with Maghsoodloo's hand near the clock, just before he stops, picks the bishop up again, and moves it to f8, presumably having spotted Rc7 for White.Chris Rice wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 12:17 pmRound 15 of the 2021 World Blitz, Arjun Erigaisi - Parham Maghsoodloo. At 7:32 into the video, Maghsoodloo moves the bishop twice, Erigasi either doesn't notice or doesn't care and the game goes on. Maghsoodloo to give him the benefit of the doubt must have convinced himself that he hadn't taken his hand off the bishop which he clearly does.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
Yeah, he knew it. I'm sure his moving the bishop was an instinctive reaction, but if you do that kind of thing you really want to be resigning as soon as you've realised what you've done.
Rukavina-Korchnoi, Leningrad Interzonal 1973. World Championship Interzonals, Leningrad/Petropolis 1973, Wade, Blackstock and Kotov, Batsford 1973:
Rukavina-Korchnoi, Leningrad Interzonal 1973. World Championship Interzonals, Leningrad/Petropolis 1973, Wade, Blackstock and Kotov, Batsford 1973:
Now Korchnoi picked up his queen and played it to d5 with check (it's the only move to keep a spark of life) and let go of it; then he did not like it there and picked it up again, put it back to d8 and then swiftly moved it to b6 where it would allow three mates on the move! Rukavina very quickly restarted Korchnoi's clock and started to remonstrate; the watching deputy chief arbiter, Walter Kuhnle-Woods, stepped forward intending to award the game to Rukavina. Korchnoi saved any further fuss by promptly resigning. No one attributed anything to the incident other than that Korchnoi was completely confused. He spent the next few hours walking the streets of Leningrad working off his annoyance with himself.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
This guy is putting up some remarkable performances for somebody whose bullet rating is actually in the 1600s
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: All Of Them
Re: Cheating in chess
Lose one queen and it is a disaster, Lose 1000 queens and it is just a statistic.
-
- Posts: 8478
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
I have been avoiding such posts, which I feel belong properly in Not Chess, but what does "actually" mean here?JustinHorton wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:20 amThis guy is putting up some remarkable performances for somebody whose bullet rating is actually in the 1600s
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.