Cheating in chess
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
Not sure I'm with you there, especially given that libel laws are not as strong in the US as they are in the UK
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
That's true in theory, and does apply to the whopping high profile cases we read about. In practice, the US has developed a thriving industry within which middling level personalities sue each other over social media comments.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:47 amNot sure I'm with you there, especially given that libel laws are not as strong in the US as they are in the UK
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
"In practice, the US has developed a thriving industry within which middling level personalities sue each other over social media comments."
US does seem to be overly-litigious at times, but it's frequently rich bullies doing it. But, UK is getting a reputation for libel tourism as well.
US does seem to be overly-litigious at times, but it's frequently rich bullies doing it. But, UK is getting a reputation for libel tourism as well.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
"As well"?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
"As well"?
Ah, I left out money-laundering.
Ah, I left out money-laundering.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Cheating in chess
No, that's not the point. Your used the term "libel tourism".
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 8:14 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
I feel he was pretty non committal, and not once accused of cheating.NickFaulks wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 10:02 amI feel he may be close to the edge of what you can get away with, particularly in the US. He must be worth suing by now.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 9:51 amPretty impressed with Naka reinventing himself as an anti-cheating expert, something of a change of pace there
He said most games.are natural moves, and only in one he thought something was unusual. Not necessarily cheating, but a move too deep for this time control.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
He pointedly did not suggest any other explanation.Wadih Khoury wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 12:28 pmNot necessarily cheating, but a move too deep for this time control.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Cheating in chess
I think it was absolutely clear that Nakamura was accusing the player of cheating. Why talk about the player having a break and then coming back stronger or his team mates 'disappearing' from chess.com.
I am not sure that focusing on two moves (qd2 and f5) is particularly helpful. You could reject the idea of f4 and Qf2 on a geometric idea that this puts the Q and both R in line for a fork so gives Black the resource of Nc5. Once you reject f4 what else are you going to play? Maybe Qd2 becomes perfectly sensible and not so difficult to find.
Similarly f5 seems very thematic, I understand that it fractures White's pawn structure and could turn out to be a big mistake, but it could be that White simply got lucky, or that White must play f5 at some point so Nakamura's suggestions of preparatory moves like g4 are simply a waste of time.
I am not seeking to defend the Armenian player, but simply saying that there are counters to Nakamura's arguments.
I am not sure that focusing on two moves (qd2 and f5) is particularly helpful. You could reject the idea of f4 and Qf2 on a geometric idea that this puts the Q and both R in line for a fork so gives Black the resource of Nc5. Once you reject f4 what else are you going to play? Maybe Qd2 becomes perfectly sensible and not so difficult to find.
Similarly f5 seems very thematic, I understand that it fractures White's pawn structure and could turn out to be a big mistake, but it could be that White simply got lucky, or that White must play f5 at some point so Nakamura's suggestions of preparatory moves like g4 are simply a waste of time.
I am not seeking to defend the Armenian player, but simply saying that there are counters to Nakamura's arguments.
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Cheating in chess
All online chess seems to allow cheating IMO.
-
- Posts: 8475
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
Matthew Turner wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 12:54 pmI think it was absolutely clear that Nakamura was accusing the player of cheating.
Yes, of course he was. Half a dozen times.
Then I think you are defending him, and quite rightly. You don't have to be certain of his innocence ( how could you be? ) to feel that he should not have to be exposed to such tendentious accusations.I am not seeking to defend the Armenian player, but simply saying that there are counters to Nakamura's arguments.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
Re: Cheating in chess
One point. Wesley So claimed that Petrosian never played the Caro Kann but beat Caruana with it - as if this was a totally absurd thing to have happened.
1. Here's a counter-example.
[Event "Asrian Memorial"]
2. Isn't this a standard suprise ploy to avoid your opponent's preparation and upset his equilibrium? Fischer playing the Queen's Gambit against Spassky is the most famous example.
3. Nakamura conceded that Caruana had a winning position and blundered it away.
4. In the games against Domiguez and So, TP played the KIA, an opening in which he has a lot of experience. Here he uses it to take down PenguinGM no less in a rapid game. Note the very similar structure to the Dominguez game.
1. Here's a counter-example.
[Event "Asrian Memorial"]
2. Isn't this a standard suprise ploy to avoid your opponent's preparation and upset his equilibrium? Fischer playing the Queen's Gambit against Spassky is the most famous example.
3. Nakamura conceded that Caruana had a winning position and blundered it away.
4. In the games against Domiguez and So, TP played the KIA, an opening in which he has a lot of experience. Here he uses it to take down PenguinGM no less in a rapid game. Note the very similar structure to the Dominguez game.
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 8:14 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
I watched the entire Nakamura review, and if you are a neutral party (don't care for either protagonist or Naka) I don't think he was accusing if cheating.
Or it shows how much a message can be perceived differently depending on the recipient.
He was toying with the idea, flirting with it, but never outright. Naka on stream is an entertainer before being a chess player. His goal was to keep it as interesting as possible, not burn bridges or get sued, but still give a bone or two for the fans on both sides of the fence.
He never said the one single suspect move was impossible. Just that he would not have been able to find it.
Or it shows how much a message can be perceived differently depending on the recipient.
He was toying with the idea, flirting with it, but never outright. Naka on stream is an entertainer before being a chess player. His goal was to keep it as interesting as possible, not burn bridges or get sued, but still give a bone or two for the fans on both sides of the fence.
He never said the one single suspect move was impossible. Just that he would not have been able to find it.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
In his book Flank Openings, Ray Keene sometimes tried to give the impression that the KIA was a forced win for White, particularly in the French/Sicilian version where White plays e5 coupled with the Knight tour Nb1-d2-f1-h2 and the h pawn march. It's a variation where similar structures recur in repeated games, so pre game study of the patterns can be rewarding.Gerard Killoran wrote: ↑Sun Oct 04, 2020 3:18 pm
4. In the games against Domiguez and So, TP played the KIA, an opening in which he has a lot of experience. Here he uses it to take down PenguinGM no less in a rapid game. Note the very similar structure to the Dominguez game.
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Cheating in chess
I reckon I would have played Qd2