Fewer clubs means a more critical mass in each club. And when chess is played mostly by retired people to begin with, the crucial factor is not a steady supply of secondary school players turning into university players. The crucial factor is a steady supply of people retiring.
Usually people who played chess as children, found more meaningful things to do with their next 40 years, but remembered how the horses move. You lose 90 year olds, you gain 60 year olds, and some of those 60 year olds have more energy than I do at 33.
So to Baron Robertson of Macclesfield's sneer that
I say tu quoque, bro.David Robertson wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:50 pmStrategic analysis and horizon-scanning aren't among your hobbies, I'm guessing