Court case

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Mick Norris
Posts: 10362
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Court case

Post by Mick Norris » Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:34 pm

David Sedgwick wrote:
Carl Hibbard wrote:Do I need to close this one off before we descend further?
The brave women who gave at times harrowing evidence in court deserve better than some of the recent posts on this thread.
Absolutely, it is easy to forget that there are real people involved when reading stories like this, especially when they seem like something out of a bad novel
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:39 pm

David Sedgwick wrote:
Carl Hibbard wrote:Do I need to close this one off before we descend further?
The brave women who gave at times harrowing evidence in court deserve better than some of the recent posts on this thread.
Indeed. I don’t object to funny. Nor even "failed attempt to be funny" for that matter. Crass, whether intended as a 'joke' or otherwise, is another matter.

I would hope this thread isn’t locked. The issues around the court case are rather important for chess. In my local area at least.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10362
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Court case

Post by Mick Norris » Tue Mar 29, 2016 2:48 pm

John Upham wrote:I gather that Mike Gunn is the SCCA spokesperson on this matter and that MG has briefed the ECF CEO.
Have the SCCA made a statement (or the ECF for that matter)?
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Neil Graham
Posts: 1945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Neil Graham » Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm

Mick Norris wrote:
John Upham wrote:I gather that Mike Gunn is the SCCA spokesperson on this matter and that MG has briefed the ECF CEO.
Have the SCCA made a statement (or the ECF for that matter)?
I don't think anyone should be making any statements until after sentencing. As Mr.Curtis wasn't a director of the BCF at the time of his arrest, I don't see that making a statement will be of any use anyway. David obviously attended court - as far as I can see from the publicity the indictment dealt with members of the Coulsdon Christian Fellowship and whilst the Coulsdon Chess Fellowship has been mentioned, there is no indication of any wrongdoing involving chess members. If anyone should be issuing a statement it should be the Coulsdon Chess Fellowship.

Martin Crichton
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Martin Crichton » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:48 pm

all joking aside this is a major embarrassment for the ECF... I did not realise the guy was a former BCF director. I think going forward this makes for a good case for vetting people in responsible positions..... Once you have done the vetting and something like this occurs later you have covered all bases.
Member of "the strongest amateur chess club in London" (Cavendish)

my views are not representative of any clubs or organisations.

NickFaulks
Posts: 8466
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Court case

Post by NickFaulks » Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:16 pm

Martin Crichton wrote:all joking aside this is a major embarrassment for the ECF... I did not realise the guy was a former BCF director. I think going forward this makes for a good case for vetting people in responsible positions..... Once you have done the vetting and something like this occurs later you have covered all bases.
A more recent ECF President says that he once killed a homeless beggar. As soon as Rev Curtis has paid his debt to society I imagine he can look forward to a lucrative second career as a TV personality.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Neil Graham
Posts: 1945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Neil Graham » Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:26 pm

Martin Crichton wrote:all joking aside this is a major embarrassment for the ECF... I did not realise the guy was a former BCF director. I think going forward this makes for a good case for vetting people in responsible positions..... Once you have done the vetting and something like this occurs later you have covered all bases.
The person concerned was the BCF Director of Management Services for a short period in 1999-2000 to my recollection. The matters in court do not refer to this period; the BCF make a proper appointment at the time. Vetting wasn't brought in till after the Bichard Report of 2004. In this instance the defence pointed out that he was a man of previous good character. This is not a major embarrassment for the ECF - but it is a matter of interest that can be discussed post sentence.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:03 am

Neil Graham wrote:If anyone should be issuing a statement it should be the Coulsdon Chess Fellowship.
Perhaps they should, but:-
"We do not have any current plans to make any further statement and do not have much information to enable us to add anything."


As quoted here :-
http://lostontime.blogspot.co.uk/2016/0 ... f.html?m=1



I don’t quite understand your last point about it being possible to discuss the case after sentencing. It’s been reported in the local and national press. Why can’t we talk about it here at this point?

User avatar
Peter D Williams
Posts: 839
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:15 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Court case

Post by Peter D Williams » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:04 am

I used to go to the chess club on a monday night with Peter and to some of the events held at the weekend from what i saw it was not run as a cult Religion was never mentioned to me the chess club was run in a friendly way and Scott Freeman is the best chess officer i have ever know his events run like clockwork and you can hear what he says at the start of an event!
I did not know Howard that well but did chat to him sometimes and he never come across to me as leader of cult he never mentioned his views to me on religion i was quite amazed to hear that the court had said he run the church like a cult of course i only went to the chess events.
when you are successful many losers bark at you.

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3604
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Court case

Post by Matthew Turner » Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:24 am

Yesterday when I searched for Howard Curtis some allegations/charges from the case came up which I felt were of a somewhat different order to the ones I'd seen before. I got the impression that we were better off with this guy behind bars, so I would definitely echo David's Sedgwick's comments about the brave women giving evidence in the case.
I have just searched for Howard Curtis again and I cannot find the same reports as yesterday and I notice that it says some links were removed under European privacy law. Not sure who is being protected here.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:52 am

Matthew Turner wrote: I have just searched for Howard Curtis again and I cannot find the same reports as yesterday and I notice that it says some links were removed under European privacy law.

Does it specifically say that? As opposed to "Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe." which is standard for all google searches, I think.

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3604
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Court case

Post by Matthew Turner » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:08 am

Jonathan, thinking about it you might well be right, but I am almost certain some results have been omitted. There simply don't appear to be as many results for Howard Curtis (in the news) as there should be.

Martin Crichton
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Martin Crichton » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:25 pm

Matthew and Jonathan
you are probably both right...this could well be soon swept under the carpet....already people talking about not discussing this case until after sentencing....who knows...guy might get banged up or a tap on the wrist with a suspended sentence?
I just find it an interesting story....(not knowing any of the people involved.) Is it a case of a mad cult leader or a case or a world gone mad with political correctness? These days you can expect a prison sentence if you are foolish enough to pat a woman on the bottom! Remember the furore with JH several years ago when he merely reminded his opponent it was her move? In hindsight I think J was lucky that he did not get 10 years in prison! having the game aborted when he was a queen up was a very small price to pay.
Last edited by Martin Crichton on Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of "the strongest amateur chess club in London" (Cavendish)

my views are not representative of any clubs or organisations.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5237
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Court case

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:42 pm

Martin Crichton wrote: Remember the furore with JS several years ago when he merely reminded his opponent it was her move? In hindsight I think J was lucky that he did not get 10 years in prison! having the game aborted when he was a queen up was a very small price to pay.
No, I don't remember this - refresh my memory, perhaps?

(and knee jerk invocations of "political correctness" always set my teeth on edge, tbh)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Martin Crichton
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Court case

Post by Martin Crichton » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:57 pm

Matt (sent you a pm)
back to the matter in hand... I am not aware of any court gagging order so let the discussions commence! adding some more levity to such a serious matter...some people (not me I hasten to add) would pay good money for that kind of thing.... I think the reverend might find a new source of income if his flock leave him lol
Member of "the strongest amateur chess club in London" (Cavendish)

my views are not representative of any clubs or organisations.