A moral issue regarding an illegal move that benefits you

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Joshua Gibbs

Re: A moral issue regarding an illegal move that benefits you

Post by Joshua Gibbs » Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:09 pm

Jon Mahony wrote:
but then again my opponent couldn’t make me move the pawn as it had nowhere to go.
well, he didn't let you off then did he?

User avatar
Jon Mahony
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: A moral issue regarding an illegal move that benefits you

Post by Jon Mahony » Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:39 pm

Joshua Gibbs wrote:
Jon Mahony wrote:
but then again my opponent couldn’t make me move the pawn as it had nowhere to go.
well, he didn't let you off then did he?
He could have asked for a time penalty - and the Atticus mystery deepens :wink:
"When you see a good move, look for a better one!" - Lasker

Joshua Gibbs

Re: A moral issue regarding an illegal move that benefits you

Post by Joshua Gibbs » Thu Nov 26, 2015 12:43 pm

Yeah sorry I didnt take that into account:)

Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: A moral issue regarding an illegal move that benefits you

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Fri Nov 27, 2015 8:15 am

I recall a RP event years ago, when the arbiter could not intervene without invitation, and Simon LeBlancq double checked his opponent, who moved but only got out of one check. He sank into deep thought. I loitered, waiting for him to complain. Instead he moved another piece to deliver check. "I never saw that" said his startled opponent and resigned. I think the new position was still illegal, but luckily the resignation avoided arguments.