Triple pawns bad?
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:01 pm
Triple pawns bad?
Just wondering if I should have played cxb3 here? Well clearly I should have done, and in fact I did. My opponent resigned immediately after I played the move.
My real question is when have you had triple (or more) pawns.
-
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: Triple pawns bad?
They're 'routine' for white in various branches of the 4 f3 Nimzo (also elsewhere in the Nimzo) and Winaver/McCutcheon French. Often fairly effective too, even in their own right in a way - the 'front' pawn on c5 can be a real menace if it survives for any period of time.
-
- Posts: 21318
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
There are some openings where you get them deliberately. One of them is a line of the Winawer French which can go 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. e5 c5 5. dxc5 Bxc3 6. bxc3 . A similar idea can arise in the Nimzo Indian. When the tripled pawns arise in normal play, they are sometimes termed "the Irish pawn centre", a term coined by the late Tony Miles when annotating one of his games against an Irish player who had such a structure in an earlier round.David Blower wrote: My real question is when have you had triple (or more) pawns.
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
If you have 7 pawns on the same file you cannot lose.
Why??
Cause it takes so many captures to get them that the opponent can only have his king left! haa
Why??
Cause it takes so many captures to get them that the opponent can only have his king left! haa
-
- Posts: 1071
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:16 pm
- Location: Sutton Coldfield
Re: Triple pawns bad?
In a rapidplay game at Lichfield CC last week, White had tripled pawns on e5, e6 and e7. It was impossible to figure out what was going on, especially as Black had doubled pawns on g3 and g4 and both kings (White's on g1 and Black's on c8) were somewhat exposed and most of the pieces were still on the board.
Ian Kingston
http://www.iankingston.com
http://www.iankingston.com
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
why did that guy give you his queen?David Blower wrote:
Just wondering if I should have played cxb3 here? Well clearly I should have done, and in fact I did. My opponent resigned immediately after I played the move.
My real question is when have you had triple (or more) pawns.
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 11:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
He blundered. Simple as that. The previous move was Black Queen was on e3, taking my bishop on b3.Kevin O'Rourke wrote:why did that guy give you his queen?David Blower wrote:
Just wondering if I should have played cxb3 here? Well clearly I should have done, and in fact I did. My opponent resigned immediately after I played the move.
My real question is when have you had triple (or more) pawns.
Hence he resigned as I took the queen off the board. It took me 3 minutes to make the move, as I made sure there was no nasty traps or anything.
-
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 3:45 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
Don't think it can happen though - if my counting is correct it would take a minimum of 16 captures. And of course the pawn on the 8th rank would no longer be a pawn!Kevin O'Rourke wrote:If you have 7 pawns on the same file you cannot lose.
Why??
Cause it takes so many captures to get them that the opponent can only have his king left! haa
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
read it in a bil hartson book. never checked it though. i would say it is possible
-
- Posts: 3559
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: Triple pawns bad?
Reg Clucas wrote:Don't think it can happen though - if my counting is correct it would take a minimum of 16 captures. And of course the pawn on the 8th rank would no longer be a pawn!Kevin O'Rourke wrote:If you have 7 pawns on the same file you cannot lose.
Why??
Cause it takes so many captures to get them that the opponent can only have his king left! haa
I say you could lose the game if you have 7 pawns on the same file. Why? Because there's no legal way of getting to such a position (as Reg says), so you could lose through having played an illegal move.Kevin O'Rourke wrote:read it in a bil hartson book. never checked it though. i would say it is possible
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
if old bill says its possible then it must be
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:53 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
12 captures, no? And the seventh pawn remains a pawn on the eighth rank until you complete your move. And I guess you could still lose.Reg Clucas wrote:Don't think it can happen though - if my counting is correct it would take a minimum of 16 captures. And of course the pawn on the 8th rank would no longer be a pawn!Kevin O'Rourke wrote:If you have 7 pawns on the same file you cannot lose.
Why??
Cause it takes so many captures to get them that the opponent can only have his king left! haa
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
Hartson said you cannot lose as the person will have only his king left.
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
i think hartson would have looked at it carefully before printing it in his book
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Triple pawns bad?
Agreed. It seems a simple matter to construct a game where, once White completes his final capture on d8, he will be checkmated next move.Alistair Campbell wrote: 12 captures, no? And the seventh pawn remains a pawn on the eighth rank until you complete your move. And I guess you could still lose.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.