Page 1 of 1
Chess Openings
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 6:02 am
by soheil_hooshdaran
Hello.
Is there any in-depth, free material, possibly video,s on specific openings
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:15 am
by Barry Sandercock
Don't worry about the openings too much. Just develop your pieces and control the centre and you won't go far wrong.
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:34 pm
by Niall Doran
Yes. The internet is full of material, there are lots of good quality videos on Youtube, just type in the name of the opening you're looking for.
Regarding openings, this is a good site, with lots of openings covered :
http://www.kenilworthchessclub.org/articles/
Exeter Chess Club have good suggestions for a beginner's opening repertoire, just download the .pdf or .pgn file.
http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/f ... repertoire
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:06 am
by soheil_hooshdaran
Thank you
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
by soheil_hooshdaran
Barry Sandercock wrote:Don't worry about the openings too much. Just develop your pieces and control the centre and you won't go far wrong.
American players also seem to have abandoned the opening phase or taken it lightly, and I increased my Elo rating by more than 40 points so far.
I also increased my USCF rating by more than 250 points, having won two NMs
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:24 am
by John Upham
Barry,
Following your excellent advice I am recommending developing rooks via a3 and h3 and bringing them to d3 and e3 so developing pieces and controlling the centre: many thanks!

Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:14 pm
by Brian Towers
John Upham wrote:Barry,
Following your excellent advice I am recommending developing rooks via a3 and h3 and bringing them to d3 and e3 so developing pieces and controlling the centre: many thanks!

John,
I don't think you have quite understood the concepts of "developing pieces" and "controlling the centre". You cannot control the centre with pieces alone, Tartakower and Reti notwithstanding. You need to occupy it with pawns to have some control.
While you were playing the 6 moves a4, h4, Ra3, Rh3, Rad3, Rhe3 your opponent was playing e5, d5, Nf6, Nc6, Bc5, Bf5 after which he has developed 4 pieces to your 2 and has an iron grip on the centre. Your opponent is crushing you!
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:47 pm
by John Upham
Oh yes, I hadn't considered that: thanks for your help Brian!
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:50 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Brian Towers wrote: You need to occupy it with pawns to have some control.
The beginner's rook development can sometimes work, particularly if there already have been some pieces exchanged.
From one of my recent games after White's move 14
after move 15
and at move 16
The King had been to d7 and back, so O-O is not legal and White has an advantage in development.
Later in the game, a more normal structure ensued.
at move 26
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:39 pm
by Brian Towers
Roger de Coverly wrote:
The beginner's rook development can sometimes work, particularly if there already have been some pieces exchanged.
Really, Roger, I don't think there is any call for such pejorative language as " beginner's rook development"! In all the more progressive middlegame books the manoeuvre is referred to as a "rook lift".
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:10 pm
by Matt Mackenzie
I recall the late D B Pritchard's chess primer telling us that developing the rooks in that fashion was "invariably bad".
You can see why he made that claim, but it wasn't really true then and certainly ain't now......
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:18 am
by soheil_hooshdaran
you can go say that's not development-it is re-deployment, however meaningless that change of words would be
Re: Chess Openings
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:19 pm
by Brian Towers
Matt Mackenzie wrote:I recall the late D B Pritchard's chess primer telling us that developing the rooks in that fashion was "invariably bad".
You can see why he made that claim, but it wasn't really true then and certainly ain't now......
Are modern coaches more tolerant?
Mark Dvoretsky's first coach, Alexander Roshal, wasn't:
Mark Dvoretsky in part 1 of his autobiography 'For Friends & Colleagues' wrote:In one of the first category tournaments I lost an upsetting game. In the next round I was playing against a friend, Ilya Khaslavsky, who later tragically died in the army; he became one of the numerous victims of hazing. After the loss I was upset and began my game with Khaslavsky with the move 1.a4. Roshal disapprovingly looked at me but did not interfere. Ilya cast a surprised look at the board and moved my pawn back to a2. [obviously no arbiters in those days] I returned it to a4. At this point Roshal lost it and shouted "That's it! I'm done with you. Let Simagin suffer with you!"
Follow up question: "Are modern juniors as cheeky?"
Mark Dvoretsky wrote:After the game (which ended in a draw) Vladimir Pavlovich [Simagin] started to explain to me that advancing the rook pawn was against opening principles and tha a game should not be started this way. I, of course, understood that myself but argued for the sake of being contrary. I said that I played the King's Indian Attack and there that move, a4, was usually useful. Simagin showed me setups for Black where this move was unnecessary. This discussion ended up being a little bit ridiculous.