IM norms

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

IM norms

Post by JustinHorton » Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:46 am

Do they expire? I always thought they did, but I happened to meet a chap the other day who had some year old norms made in Swiss tournaments and he seemed to think they were valid.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21183
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: IM norms

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:01 am

JustinHorton wrote:Do they expire? I always thought they did, but I happened to meet a chap the other day who had some year old norms made in Swiss tournaments and he seemed to think they were valid.
I believe the rules changed some time back. I expect it was an idea by you know who.

One or two British players revived old norms from the 1980s or earlier and got titles on the back of it.

from http://www.gibraltarchesscongress.com/g ... port4.html
John Saunders wrote:Perhaps there is a mini-trend starting, with Robert’s norm here and 60-year-old Jeff Horner’s clinching of his IM title at the last Monarch Assurance Isle of Man International some quarter of a century after getting his first two norms

User avatar
IM Jack Rudd
Posts: 4763
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
Location: Bideford
Contact:

Re: IM norms

Post by IM Jack Rudd » Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:08 am

Chris Beaumont became an IM courtesy of that rule change. (He had two IM norms in the 1980s and two in the late 1990s.)

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4564
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: IM norms

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:14 am

That's right. The move was retrospective even, so IM norms which were thought to have died were resuscitated.

Howard Grist told me last year that anyone who has ever been over 2300 can now claim the FM title as soon as they have played a minimum number of games (something like 24). But there is no requirement that the applicant should still have been 2300+ by the end of those minimum number of games!

No doubt - though I am guessing here - this applies to anyone who once had a phantom 2300 rating, even if he loses it for good the following day and it is never published in any of the quarterly FIDE lists ...

As I told you all in another thread though (and I think this is what Roger is alluding to), applicants have to pay FIDE for their titles - out of their own pocket too, at least if they are English.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: IM norms

Post by JustinHorton » Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:23 am

Thanks for this.

What this is about is that while at the tournament in Benasque that finished yesterday, my wife was driving me out of town towards our campsite when we picked up a hitch-hiker who was on a walking holiday: nothing to do with the tournament. Anyway, it turned out that by concidence he'd been a strong player on the English scene twenty years ago and he had a couple of IM norms from then that - he thought, apparently correctly - had become valid again.

So I thought I'd check it before writing it up for S&B.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Post Reply