As I said, it is now but wasn't always (remarkably)Barry Sandercock wrote:The solution is an illegal move ! No wonder I couldn't get it.
toughest mate in one puzzle
-
- Posts: 5250
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
i felt my time had been wastedBarry Sandercock wrote:The solution is an illegal move ! No wonder I couldn't get it.
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:48 am
- Location: Bradford
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
The puzzle apparently dates from before the time any official rules existed and thus there was an ambiguity about whether the piece you wanted to promote to had to be the same colour or not.Barry Sandercock wrote:The solution is an illegal move ! No wonder I couldn't get it.
-
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:04 pm
- Location: writer
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
We cleared up that old chestnut about promoting to an opponent's piece some years ago. The last such correction was also in promotion.
You could promote to a piece of your own colour that was already on the board. Now it says 'new'. I thought of that one when Geurt Gijssen and I were going over the new Laws in Majorca. WE made the change without consulting anybody and nobody ever commented.
The late Richard Haddrell composed a nice problem.
White Ka5 Rb6 Pc6 Pd7 Be3.
Black Ka7. The solution was 1 d8=R, using the white rook on b6.
Another one, brought up by readers of Chess Magazine, was that the Laws used to state; A king is not allowed to be in check from one or two pieces. So, it was OK from 3 pieces. White's mating move was to leave the king in check from two pieces and make a move that exposed the king to check from three pieces. The Law now states, in check from one or more pieces.
People have asked me whether the process of revising the Laws will ever be concluded. My answer is, 'I hope not'.
You could promote to a piece of your own colour that was already on the board. Now it says 'new'. I thought of that one when Geurt Gijssen and I were going over the new Laws in Majorca. WE made the change without consulting anybody and nobody ever commented.
The late Richard Haddrell composed a nice problem.
White Ka5 Rb6 Pc6 Pd7 Be3.
Black Ka7. The solution was 1 d8=R, using the white rook on b6.
Another one, brought up by readers of Chess Magazine, was that the Laws used to state; A king is not allowed to be in check from one or two pieces. So, it was OK from 3 pieces. White's mating move was to leave the king in check from two pieces and make a move that exposed the king to check from three pieces. The Law now states, in check from one or more pieces.
People have asked me whether the process of revising the Laws will ever be concluded. My answer is, 'I hope not'.
-
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:23 pm
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
There is another general technique which is particularly useful in this case, although it feels a bit like cheating.Christopher Kreuzer wrote:As Roger correctly pointed out, the easiest way to solve the mate in one is to look for the file or diagonal that can't be blocked.
That it is to make use of the fact that in a well composed problem every piece on the board should have a purpose. No piece should be on the board just to make up the numbers. With that piece of knowledge there is a very obvious apparent redundancy in the position, but of course it can't be redundant else it wouldn't be well composed.
Ah, but I was so much older then. I'm younger than that now.
-
- Posts: 8838
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
Is that seeming redundancy the pawn on b2? Prevents the Black queen from covering a3.Brian Towers wrote:There is another general technique which is particularly useful in this case, although it feels a bit like cheating.Christopher Kreuzer wrote:As Roger correctly pointed out, the easiest way to solve the mate in one is to look for the file or diagonal that can't be blocked.
That it is to make use of the fact that in a well composed problem every piece on the board should have a purpose. No piece should be on the board just to make up the numbers. With that piece of knowledge there is a very obvious apparent redundancy in the position, but of course it can't be redundant else it wouldn't be well composed.
-
- Posts: 1266
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:23 pm
Re: toughest mate in one puzzle
Yes, that and the rook and queen battery on the e file. Either one would be enough to keep the black queen pinned.
Ah, but I was so much older then. I'm younger than that now.