Non taken.NickFaulks wrote:I intend no offence to Kevin, but advising him to play like Rapport probably isn't helpful.Roger de Coverly wrote: Rapport came up with the idea of playing b4.
When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
-
- Posts: 5206
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
If we are being honest, playing like Rapport isn't *always* that helpful to RapportNickFaulks wrote:I intend no offence to Kevin, but advising him to play like Rapport probably isn't helpful.Roger de Coverly wrote: Rapport came up with the idea of playing b4.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
Why not? The position up to b4 is a main line which can and is reached by many move orders and also with colours reversed as a Kings Indian style defence against the London system.NickFaulks wrote: but advising him to play like Rapport probably isn't helpful.
-
- Posts: 8453
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
Sorry Roger, you're taking my throwaway line a bit too literally. I was making no comment on the move b4, particularly as we have no idea whether anything resembling this happened in the game in question. I was just saying that asking oneself "what would Rapport do here?" is not a practical approach for most non-geniuses.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:31 am
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
In general if your pieces are well placed and you don't see an obvious plan you should look for a pawn break! Preferably on the side of the board you have an advantage.
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
good advice. Although I don’t wish to open my king up with pawns on f2, g3 and h2. That only leaves the queenside.Thomas Rendle wrote:In general if your pieces are well placed and you don't see an obvious plan you should look for a pawn break! Preferably on the side of the board you have an advantage.
-
- Posts: 5821
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
"In early middle game when I’ve moved each piece once or twice, happy with everything on the squares they are on, what do you do when you don’t want to move anything? "
That really is the art of chess - first try to find a move that doesn't do any harm to you. I realise that is probably not helpful. I played Nasir Rizvi last night. Normally, I lose to him in 20 moves, so it was a great success to lose in 50 moves. Coming out of the opening, where we had exchanged two pairs of pawns, leaving a typical IQP (Isolated Queen's Pawn) position, we both realised that we didn't want to move any of the minor pieces, so spent some time shuffling rooks and queen, and playing h3, h6, a3, a5 etc. Having got down to the increment by move 30, things got chaotic and I tried to do something, thus losing!
That really is the art of chess - first try to find a move that doesn't do any harm to you. I realise that is probably not helpful. I played Nasir Rizvi last night. Normally, I lose to him in 20 moves, so it was a great success to lose in 50 moves. Coming out of the opening, where we had exchanged two pairs of pawns, leaving a typical IQP (Isolated Queen's Pawn) position, we both realised that we didn't want to move any of the minor pieces, so spent some time shuffling rooks and queen, and playing h3, h6, a3, a5 etc. Having got down to the increment by move 30, things got chaotic and I tried to do something, thus losing!
-
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:46 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
This assumes you have an advantage on one side of the board, so not that helpful in most of my gamesThomas Rendle wrote:In general if your pieces are well placed and you don't see an obvious plan you should look for a pawn break! Preferably on the side of the board you have an advantage.
-
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
If giving away the G4 square isn't a problem then go h4. If it is then go h3. Then go Kh2 next moveKevin O'Rourke wrote:good advice. Although I don’t wish to open my king up with pawns on f2, g3 and h2. That only leaves the queenside.Thomas Rendle wrote:In general if your pieces are well placed and you don't see an obvious plan you should look for a pawn break! Preferably on the side of the board you have an advantage.
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
Without seeing the position as Jack said eons ago, none of this is in any sense helpful. Sorry that's a bit unkind to people who are trying to be helpful - but Kevin, give us the position and then all of these guys will have another go, no doubt.
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
It will be nice to see the position you were happy with & it was you to move.
-
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
I'm not sure I want to see the position. It would ruin the game of trying to give generally applicable advice if it turns out the pieces are not really on good squares.
I disagree with:
So I'm going with the positional advice; try to work out what your opponent wants to do and prevent it.
I disagree with:
Because it is the kind of ambitious approach that people make work using talent, which seems a little unfair.Thomas Rendle wrote:In general if your pieces are well placed and you don't see an obvious plan you should look for a pawn break! Preferably on the side of the board you have an advantage.
So I'm going with the positional advice; try to work out what your opponent wants to do and prevent it.
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:31 am
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
That may be true Paul but it is what you're supposed to do. It helps to know what pawn breaks are usually good in the position (...d5 in Sicilian, b4-b5 in some QGD structures etc.) I only said 'look for a pawn break' which at least gives you something constructive to do, and if you don't see a good pawn break and you don't see a way to improve your pieces then... probably your position isn't so great!
That said your advice is also sound - "work out what the opponent wants to do and prevent it".
Finally you should *try* to put pieces on squares with an idea in mind - again this is an important part (maybe the most important part) of opening knowledge.
That said your advice is also sound - "work out what the opponent wants to do and prevent it".
Finally you should *try* to put pieces on squares with an idea in mind - again this is an important part (maybe the most important part) of opening knowledge.
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
I find it pointless having the ideas & not seeing the position. Particularly as there is no "pass" in chess.
in the last 30 days I have 2 games where my opponent was happy with their position. One offered a draw in time trouble. I checked match score & other boards & then analysed the position. There was a forcing win for my opponent so I accepted.
On the second game my opponent repeated a move just before a time control & was not in time trouble. We both assumed his team mate was easily winning. I repeated and offered a draw and he accepted.
The issue in the position was that I was dead lost. A piece out of play & no way to defend the a & b files on the white side of a French. When I looked at the match score in the evening his team mate had lost an easily won endgame.
in the last 30 days I have 2 games where my opponent was happy with their position. One offered a draw in time trouble. I checked match score & other boards & then analysed the position. There was a forcing win for my opponent so I accepted.
On the second game my opponent repeated a move just before a time control & was not in time trouble. We both assumed his team mate was easily winning. I repeated and offered a draw and he accepted.
The issue in the position was that I was dead lost. A piece out of play & no way to defend the a & b files on the white side of a French. When I looked at the match score in the evening his team mate had lost an easily won endgame.
-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm
Re: When your happy with your position and don’t want to move
I haven’t included the position because I was asking more generally and strategically as oppose to tactics.
If there were tactics then I would be doing them and pieces would be moving and sparks would be flying. Tactics are sometimes a lot easier for weaker players such as myself as oppose to strategy.
If there were tactics then I would be doing them and pieces would be moving and sparks would be flying. Tactics are sometimes a lot easier for weaker players such as myself as oppose to strategy.