Page 1 of 2

british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:44 pm
by Ian Lamb
when was the last time the British champion lost in the first round?

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:48 pm
by Sebastian Stone
Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:50 pm
by Ian Lamb
its offical conquest lost but no news on arkell as yet
http://www.britishchess09.com/events/british.htm

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:52 pm
by Jaimie Wilson
Thomas Rendle won in 4 moves today. I wonder if that was the Vodafone gambit in action.

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:53 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Ian Lamb wrote:its offical conquest lost but no news on arkell as yet
http://www.britishchess09.com/events/british.htm
Ok, I give in and agree - boards 6-10 are clearly a bit of a mess :oops:

:cry:

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:54 pm
by JustinHorton
Jaimie Wilson wrote:Thomas Rendle won in 4 moves today. I wonder if that was the Vodafone gambit in action.
The Internet Attack is also under suspicion.

I'm quite surprised Charlie Storey lost as he's apparently graded 3379.

Still, if it's a bit of a mess, better have a mess in the first round than the last.

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:56 pm
by Sebastian Stone
Carl Hibbard wrote:
Ian Lamb wrote:its offical conquest lost but no news on arkell as yet
http://www.britishchess09.com/events/british.htm
Ok, I give in and agree - boards 6-10 are clearly a bit of a mess :oops:

:cry:
A source of constant amusement for all those who wish they were there. :oops:

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:58 pm
by Carl Hibbard
I am at home now watching the Apache log file grow past the 200 megabyte size, oh well at least its busy

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:04 pm
by Alex Holowczak
Carl Hibbard wrote:I am at home now watching the Apache log file grow past the 200 megabyte size, oh well at least its busy
Do you know how many have tuned in to today's games yet?

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:13 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Alex Holowczak wrote:
Carl Hibbard wrote:I am at home now watching the Apache log file grow past the 200 megabyte size, oh well at least its busy
Do you know how many have tuned in to today's games yet?
No Alex it takes a while to download and analyze a log file of that size, so I will do it in the morning before i go to work!

Around 2,300 visitors would be considered a "good" figure but the number could be anything to be honest

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:21 pm
by Jonathan Bryant
Sebastian Stone wrote:Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.
The full game is up on the championship site now ... looks like Keith got trapped in a mating net.

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:32 pm
by Sebastian Stone
Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Sebastian Stone wrote:Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.
The full game is up on the championship site now ... looks like Keith got trapped in a mating net.
Really? After 40...Kxg4 41. Nh6+ Kg5 I don't know what white can do.

Maybe 41...Kxf4 is better.

What am I missing?

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:34 pm
by Richard Bates
Sebastian Stone wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Sebastian Stone wrote:Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.
The full game is up on the championship site now ... looks like Keith got trapped in a mating net.
Really? After 40...Kxg4 41. Nh6+ Kg5 I don't know what white can do.

Maybe 41...Kxf4 is better.

What am I missing?
Nh6 is checkmate

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:35 pm
by Alex Holowczak
Sebastian Stone wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Sebastian Stone wrote:Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.
The full game is up on the championship site now ... looks like Keith got trapped in a mating net.
Really? After 40...Kxg4 41. Nh6+ Kg5 I don't know what white can do.

Maybe 41...Kxf4 is better.

What am I missing?
40...Kxg4 41. Nh6#

Re: british champion Stu conquest loses in first round big shock

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:35 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Sebastian Stone wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote:
Sebastian Stone wrote:Apparently English Champion Keith Arkell has also resigned.

However considering we're on the same move that apparently also caused his opponent to resign I think we should take this with a pinch of salt. :mrgreen:

Especially when we consider the position (after 21. Rc1), not that I claim to be an expert.
The full game is up on the championship site now ... looks like Keith got trapped in a mating net.
Really? After 40...Kxg4 41. Nh6+ Kg5 I don't know what white can do.

Maybe 41...Kxf4 is better.

What am I missing?
Hard to go Kg5 with the pawn on f4 really....