The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Discuss anything you like about chess related matters in this forum.
Kevin O'Rourke
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:01 pm

The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Kevin O'Rourke » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:50 pm

The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Would someone care to explain the obvious or main difference between these 2 openings please as I seem to get them confused or merged more often than not. Is it simply down to move order?

Thanks

Matthew Turner
Posts: 3604
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Matthew Turner » Wed Oct 04, 2017 3:06 pm

Well the English is 1. C4 and the Reti is 1. Nf3 d5. 2. C4. If in the English Black intended to play d5 (after say e6 or c6) and White intended to play Nf3 then the two lines would lead to the same thing. The Reti simply takes out some possibilities for both sides.

Paul Dargan
Posts: 526
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 11:23 pm

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Paul Dargan » Wed Oct 04, 2017 3:11 pm

English players who don't intend to play Reversed Dragon set-ups or don't fancy reversed closed sicilian/grand prix structures often choose 1Nf3 to avoid c4 e5 options for Black - but of course they cut-out some of their own options too

Paul

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21322
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Roger de Coverly » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:58 pm

Kevin O'Rourke wrote:please as I seem to get them confused or merged more often than not. Is it simply down to move order?
You can reach the same positions from different move orders. If you wanted to regard as a Reti everything that had a Knight on f3 and Black not playing .. e5 early on and an English as everything else, that would be a way of looking at it. Positions where both c4 and c5 had been played might normally be regarded as English, where they didn't transpose back into Queens Gambit or Kings Indian territory.

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5250
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:15 pm

Matthew Turner wrote:Well the English is 1. C4 and the Reti is 1. Nf3 d5. 2. C4. If in the English Black intended to play d5 (after say e6 or c6) and White intended to play Nf3 then the two lines would lead to the same thing. The Reti simply takes out some possibilities for both sides.
That is the original more restricted definition of the Reti Opening, but most people count 1 Nf3 2 g3 setups these days as well?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1733
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Nick Burrows » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:53 pm

I would have said 1.Nf3 2.g3 is more generally the KIA - that sometimes transposes into a Reti

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5250
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: The main difference between the Reti and the English?

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:04 am

Though in those lines c4 can be delayed for some time, which can give the game a rather different character from it being punted on move 2.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)