ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
-
John Philpott
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Proposal to discontinue the grading of overseas games of members rejected.
-
John Philpott
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Barnstaple Chess Club admitted as an Other Organisation.
-
John Philpott
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Meeting closed. That may be all for now (depending upon the WiFi on Virgin Trains).
- Carl Hibbard
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Yes excellent job thanksPaul Cooksey wrote:Thanks for the updates John
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
David Robertson
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
So, in sum, we have;
* a 'lame duck' President whose manifesto has been rejected;
* no CEO;
* an FD, but no accounts;
* no Int Dir;
* no M&M Dir;
* a Home Dir;
* a Kids Dir;
* no Women's Dir (rejected)
* a FIDE del;
* no Publicity Officer/Dir/whatever
[* no chair of Governance (or Co sec??)] **
Keep calm. And carry on
** RdC's subsequent post, noted
* a 'lame duck' President whose manifesto has been rejected;
* no CEO;
* an FD, but no accounts;
* no Int Dir;
* no M&M Dir;
* a Home Dir;
* a Kids Dir;
* no Women's Dir (rejected)
* a FIDE del;
* no Publicity Officer/Dir/whatever
[* no chair of Governance (or Co sec??)] **
Keep calm. And carry on
** RdC's subsequent post, noted
Last edited by David Robertson on Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22607
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
From the AgendaDavid Robertson wrote: * no chair of Governance (or Co sec??)
12.8.3 Chairman of the Governance Committee
Chris Majer nominated by John Philpott (Chairman of a Standing Committee)
12.8.4 Members of the Governance Committee
Richard Haddrell }
Andrew Leadbetter } nominated by John Philpott (Chairman of a Standing Committee)
-
Richard Bates
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
- John Upham
- Posts: 8329
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
- Contact:
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Maybe "unpleasant" is the default mood for such meetings and "pleasant" would be a bonus mood?Paul Cooksey wrote:Why the meeting was unpleasant is not at all clear to me from the report.
Arbiter, Organiser, Swiss Mangler person, Rating Officer, Teacher, Coach and Photographer
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11368
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
May have lost without the motion being accepted firstCarl Hibbard wrote:A little closer than I expected to be honest and not a good startJohn Philpott wrote:President - Roger Edwards 111 Not this candidate 101
He's not the candidate to unite the ECF, and the voting has shown that, but we will see how he does from here
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Martin Regan
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
As someone once said: "The sky is dark with pigeons coming home to roost."
I am surprised and saddened that Adam was not elected - it is rare for Council to oust existing directors in favour of NOTA. I am more surprised that it was done on a show of hands. Given the nature of proxies, it should have been taken to card vote.
Having said that Adam not turning up AND not sending a statement was bound to irritate Council and strikes me as politically foolish. I am afraid that Mr Giddins is right in that I can not see Adam being co-opted to the board, without fireworks. Yet more fallout from CJ, I fear.
That we now have a President unsuited for the glad-handing that is integral to the role and essentially castrated is unfortunate. The paradox is that had Roger wished to prove his suitability for the role, he ought to have stepped down when his manifesto was rejected. A man who writes that such a rejection would turn him into a "toothless tiger" a) regards himself as a tiger and b) is unlikely to accept the rejection with a shrug of the shoulders.I wish him the best but fear the worse - a rallying point for the RdCs of this world.
Congratulations to Nigel - the right decision was made and emphatically so. And also to Alex H.
I am surprised and saddened that Adam was not elected - it is rare for Council to oust existing directors in favour of NOTA. I am more surprised that it was done on a show of hands. Given the nature of proxies, it should have been taken to card vote.
Having said that Adam not turning up AND not sending a statement was bound to irritate Council and strikes me as politically foolish. I am afraid that Mr Giddins is right in that I can not see Adam being co-opted to the board, without fireworks. Yet more fallout from CJ, I fear.
That we now have a President unsuited for the glad-handing that is integral to the role and essentially castrated is unfortunate. The paradox is that had Roger wished to prove his suitability for the role, he ought to have stepped down when his manifesto was rejected. A man who writes that such a rejection would turn him into a "toothless tiger" a) regards himself as a tiger and b) is unlikely to accept the rejection with a shrug of the shoulders.I wish him the best but fear the worse - a rallying point for the RdCs of this world.
Congratulations to Nigel - the right decision was made and emphatically so. And also to Alex H.
-
Sean Hewitt
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
I have no doubt that that is correct.Mick Norris wrote:May have lost without the motion being accepted first
In which case I must apologise to Roger Edwards. As Krishna Shiatis has pointed out, I've "been mean to Roger". It appears I've got him elected to the ECF board - and you can't get much meaner than that.
More seriously, I was extremely disappointed to learn that there were 11 votes against me for non-exec. What on earth were the other 190 thinking? That's what I want to know!
-
Martin Regan
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Sean wrote: "I was extremely disappointed to learn that there were 11 votes against me for non-exec. What on earth were the other 190 thinking? That's what I want to know!"
Not as disappointed as I - He had 19 of my proxies!!
Anyway, congratulations on your election
Not as disappointed as I - He had 19 of my proxies!!
Anyway, congratulations on your election
-
John Philpott
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Paul Cooksey wrote
Company Secretary is a Board appointment rather than an elected position: I will continue in that capacity if that is the wish of the newly-elected Board. Some of the tasks that I had originally been performing as Governance Chair, particularly in relation to meetings and elections, are really the province of the Company Secretary, but were assumed by me (and by John Dunleavy before me) because they were not performed by the previous Company Secretary. I am expecting to retain these, which will make Chris Majer's workload more manageable.
There was no question of resignation: I was elected by the 2011 AGM to serve as Chairman of the Governance Committee until the conclusion of the 2012 AGM, and I saw out my term. With effect from 6.31 p.m. Chris Majer assumed the role of Chairman.Will John manage to resign before the 6:30 deadline? I'm on tenterhooks!
Company Secretary is a Board appointment rather than an elected position: I will continue in that capacity if that is the wish of the newly-elected Board. Some of the tasks that I had originally been performing as Governance Chair, particularly in relation to meetings and elections, are really the province of the Company Secretary, but were assumed by me (and by John Dunleavy before me) because they were not performed by the previous Company Secretary. I am expecting to retain these, which will make Chris Majer's workload more manageable.
-
Andrew Zigmond
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:23 pm
- Location: Harrogate
Re: ECF Annual General Meeting 13 October 2012
Roger Edwards appears now to have the chance to prove a lot of people wrong. That will be a challenge but it's probably easier than being elected with the expectation you will perform miracles.
The vote may have been narrow - although not as narrow as the de facto confidence vote in CJ de Mooi at the finance meeting - but a majority still chose Roger Edwards to lead the ECF for the year ahead. I for one am willing to accept that.
The vote may have been narrow - although not as narrow as the de facto confidence vote in CJ de Mooi at the finance meeting - but a majority still chose Roger Edwards to lead the ECF for the year ahead. I for one am willing to accept that.
Controller - Yorkshire League
Chairman - Harrogate Chess Club
All views expressed entirely my own
Chairman - Harrogate Chess Club
All views expressed entirely my own