Annual General Meeting 2013

Debate directly related to English Chess Federation matters.
Andrew Camp
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 11:18 am
Location: Colwyn Bay

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Andrew Camp » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:30 pm

John Philpott wrote:
There was quite a lot of discussion on the Home Director's report.
Why?
Chairman of North Wales Junior Chess Association
[email protected]

Simon Brown
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Sevenoaks, Kent, if not in Costa Calida, Spain

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Simon Brown » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:33 pm

JustinHadi wrote:Biggest day for English Chess since 2004?
Definitely the biggest day since.......... Yesterday?

Simon Brown
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Sevenoaks, Kent, if not in Costa Calida, Spain

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Simon Brown » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:35 pm

Seriously though, I've been away for a bit and missed the fact that we are not to have a women's team. Can anyone point me to some facts and the discussion on the forum?

Neil Graham
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Neil Graham » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:39 pm

Simon Brown wrote:Seriously though, I've been away for a bit and missed the fact that we are not to have a women's team. Can anyone point me to some facts and the discussion on the forum?
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/england- ... mpionship/

User avatar
David Shepherd
Posts: 912
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 3:46 pm

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by David Shepherd » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:40 pm

http://www.ecforum.org.uk/viewtopic.php ... 1&start=60 from here on forum (you need to work forward in that thread)

John Philpott

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by John Philpott » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:45 pm

John McKenna wrote
I would like to echo Angus' question above about why exactly there was no card vote on the SCCU's proposal when the initial vote was so close?
The chairman of the meeting clearly did not want another card vote so early on in the meeting: had this item been taken at a later stage the meeting, I suspect that there might well have been one. A card vote also takes place if 20 members present in person or by proxy demand one: there was not sufficient demand to trigger this.

Andrew Camp wrote
Why?[was there quite a lot of discussion on the Home Director's report
There were some a couple areas that concerned particular Council members: the hosting of the grading database, and an argument involving an ECF Director that took place in the control room during the British Championships.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by JustinHorton » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:45 pm

John McKenna wrote: I would like to echo Angus' question
David's, I think.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 6028
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Carl Hibbard » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:48 pm

John Philpott wrote:There were some a couple areas that concerned particular Council members: the hosting of the grading database, and an argument involving an ECF Director that took place in the control room during the British Championships.
The argument has not been mentioned before?
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

Simon Brown
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Sevenoaks, Kent, if not in Costa Calida, Spain

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Simon Brown » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:53 pm

Thanks to Neil and David. I wonder if all the people who donated money for the championships were consulted before the International Director effectively ensured that the women's team would withdraw?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21377
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Roger de Coverly » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:55 pm

Carl Hibbard wrote:The argument has not been mentioned before?

There was an immensely vague rumour, which may have conflated itself with the story of the Director who didn't walk out. Perhaps something like X had a row with Y over the issue Z, without it ever being posted as to who X and Y were and what Z was about.
Last edited by Roger de Coverly on Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

David Robertson

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by David Robertson » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:56 pm

Carl Hibbard wrote: The argument has not been mentioned before?
Forum standards must be slipping!

John McKenna

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by John McKenna » Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:57 pm

Thanks to John Philpott for clarifying the niceties of voting at the AGM. One does begin to wonder if might even be possible to gauge whether or not to hold a card vote based on whose hands were up or down!?

Also, thanks to Justin for correcting my mistake that it was Angus' question regarding the voting when it was David Shepherd who actually asked.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by JustinHorton » Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:00 pm

Anybody know what time the Big Match is on? Normally at this time of day I'm following Oxford getting beat via Twitter and I ned to know when to tear myself away...
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21377
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by Roger de Coverly » Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:04 pm

JustinHadi wrote:Adams - Kasimdzhanov. Could have led to a bona fide world title shot (and associated publicity)
I remember watching it live. There was a position where Adams could have played for a win which would have left him in a very strong position in the overall match. In practice he played a line which settled for a draw.

John Philpott

Re: Annual General Meeting 2013

Post by John Philpott » Sat Oct 12, 2013 3:07 pm

Only just past 3.05 and we are through Officers' reports and have passed a vote of thanks to the outgoing Officers. Hopefully there will be a tea break before the elections.