The British itself!

Debate directly related to English Chess Federation matters.
Post Reply
Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:27 pm

John Moore wrote: Incidentally, Jonathan, I am impressed that you remember this was a Basman recommendation on one of his tapes.

I bought quite a few. Naturally the appeal of the Be2 Sicilian tape was the promise of winning a piece after 1 e4 c5, 2 Nf3 d6, 3 Be2 Nf6, 4 c3 Nxe4.

I did get a couple of wins that way. If they didn’t fall for it, though, I tended to do rather badly.


It’s funny that I can remember details of quite a few of these tapes, and yet ask me about a game I played yesterday and I’d be at a loss to tell you anything at all.

RDK’s d4 c4 Repertoire for White, btw, is one of the best things he’s every written. Much better than his d4 repertoire book. The tape was essentially his repertoire at the time and I reckon you could still use it as the basis of a repertoire even now. Probably you’d only really be risking anything when playing the Grunfeld or Semi-Slav, but other than that you could just use these 2 tapes.


Thanks for the schedule info John. A draw perhaps for Justin, perhaps. It does get a bit dull if White avoids the Berlin Wall.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:29 pm

Audio Chess update:

Apparently still going ... http://audiochess.com/chess/index.php?_ ... ductId=206


When do you think he last sold a tape? It’s a shame they’re not available as MP3 downloads for a pound or two. Some of them would be pointless now, but some of them (RDK’s tapes on working as Korchnoi’s second, for example) would be fascinating to hear.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22610
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:34 pm

Paul Dargan wrote: There was a Hodgson-Suba game from one the the Britishes in Eastbourne (92-ish?) in this line.
Blackpool zonal of 1990, it appears



Julian always made it look very straightforward, but it's not an easy style to emulate, particularly when your opponents know what's coming and have asked their disrespectful engines for ideas to combat it.

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:42 pm

Actually, I have remembered a couple of other tapes. The Closed Sicilian by Tim Harding would have been excellent except Mike Basman read it and sounded like he'd never seen it before. The number of times he said oh no the position is wrong put the bishop back on where ever etc etc ad infinitum. The other one I remember is where the noise of Basman's kettle fights with the audio commentary. Anyway sorry for the digression - but interesting to know that you can still buy them.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:50 pm

Trivia Question:

When was the last time David Howell was 30 minutes up on the clock?

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by Nick Burrows » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:03 pm

Anyone know why Chessbomb has Van Zyl-Jack Rudd as Jack's name each day?

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:04 pm

Unfortunate blunder by Rob Willmoth against Marcus Harvey.

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:10 pm

Now Jack has finished, you can ask him yourself! Perhaps it's his Sunday name

David Sedgwick
Posts: 5252
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: The British itself!

Post by David Sedgwick » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:15 pm

Nick Burrows wrote:Anyone know why Chessbomb has Van Zyl-Jack Rudd as Jack's name each day?
They're confusing him with another player.

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: The British itself!

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:18 pm

John Moore wrote:Now Jack has finished, you can ask him yourself! Perhaps it's his Sunday name
Ooh. Jack beat Keith. Nice game!

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:28 pm

Justin stopped the rot with a draw against Jude Lenier - not the player you'd expect to be playing on 0-3.

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: The British itself!

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:32 pm

The dynamics in Howell-Williams are fascinating. Amazing that the activity of the pieces can compensate in time before White gets developed.

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:42 pm

Too difficult for me. I just offer the suggestion of 24 Rf2 Nh1 as a rep.

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10803
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: The British itself!

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:50 pm

Yeah, I think it will be a draw by repetition as well. But after 27.Rf1, can Black play 27...Bh4. Maybe White can also try 27.Rh2 as one of Black's pieces might get trapped. (EDIT: And he has played Rh2, whether to avoid losing in the 27.Rf1 line, or because White has an advantage here, I have no idea). (EDIT 2: Huh? What was wrong with 27.Bxf3+ first?)

John Moore
Posts: 2364
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm

Re: The British itself!

Post by John Moore » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:03 pm

I think that we need a strong player to have a look at Howell-Williams. Or someone who can be bothered to stick an engine on. Engines given enough time will see what needs to be done.

Post Reply