Jonathan Bryant wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:09 pm
Paul McKeown wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:02 am
Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Fri Sep 17, 2021 2:04 pm
For for 5 years,
with for the other 7.
I have had no connection with CSC whatsoever for the past seven years.
I can't speak for the last three and a half years but I can for the three and a half before that. Paul had no connection with CSC during this time. Since I was responsible for managing the CSC programmes in schools in London at the time (except for Newham), I would have known.
Thanks, Jonathan. Although your confirmation should not really be necessary.
Jonathan Bryant wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:09 pm
Simply making stuff up about people - based on something you've found on the internet and misunderstood or for any other reason - and then calling people dishonest when they point out you are wrong is really no way not an acceptable way to behave.
[snip]...[/snip]
UPDATE:
I would have reported the original post from Chris Goodall but the system won't allow me to on the grounds that it already has been. I'm all for freedom of expression but I don't believe that should be allowed to extend to being free to invent and spread non-truths.
The problem is that the internet is full of conspiracy theorists with unlimited time to waste in their private research bunkers, feverishly chasing up "evidence" for their nonsense. It doesn't matter what their idée fixe is - climate change denial, antivaccine drivel, UFOs, birtherism, whatever - it doesn't matter. No matter how the truth is demonstrated, the f**kwit will attack the source of the evidence, deny the evidence, completely ignore the evidence, do some further futile googling, completely misunderstand what they have read, cherry-pick some phrase or other, ignore context, "just ask questions", do whatever they need justify their cretinous belief to themself.
This particular idiot's current hobby horse is attacking anyone who disapproves in any way of Mike Truran's conduct as CEO or his candidacy. To this end he smears those who have raised issues, attacking their motives and insists on seeing them as being some vast CSC centric conspiracy of secret handshakes. A rational person might think it all rather exhausting, and much easier simply to ask people what their motives are. Not this particular space cadet, though. The aliens are amongst us...