Ian Thompson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:48 pm
David Sedgwick wrote: ↑Sat Oct 16, 2021 4:37 pm
Meanwhile, Tim Wall is busy maligning Michael Farthing on Twitter. During this morning he took time out to sneer at this Forum and to allege that Mike Truran couldn't be trusted to keep his agreement with Malcolm Pein.
... and "I plan to vote for ‘None of the Above’ instead of Mike Truran as CEO at today’s @ecfchess AGM". He didn't mention any Silver members wanting this in his post on chess.com, never mind the majority of those expressing an opinion.
I wish to tell the people that I not shocked as how can he justify that.
I confronted tim today over his telling me my
Figures was wrong and I was willing to show the email to him as proof.
He sent me a spreadsheet said this
1) I have discounted all 'multiple votes'. These are just not safe, no serious election allows 'family voting'.
2)I have allowed the emails from *, even though I cannot find them on my computer. I recall that Xxxxxxxxxxxxx 'voted' before he paid his Silver membership. Anyway, I have allowed these to count
3)I have dismissed your comment about people emailing after Malcolm withdrew. People were expressing a preference, all views are relevant when deciding whether to support Mike on Saturday or not
I had the following
17 Mike
16 Malcolm (3 came in after he withdrew) but also one was not a silver member who replied
Chair of government
Robert 17
Chris 4
I see tim from his comments has voted for none of the above and I hope the silver members really want someone that don’t Think that their views are important???