Mick Norris wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 5:48 pm
Adam Raoof wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 2:07 pm
This is all very complicated, perhaps unnecessarily. All members should have one vote. Votes should be for positions, not referendums on topics. Membership should be simpler and needs reform. Voting should be online, and confidential.
All members should be entitled to attend the AGM, as you would be able to in a company as a shareholder or attend a council meeting as a resident.
I'm not against the principle, Adam, but I do question the venue cost to the ECF; how many members would attend?
We have the advantage in the MCF that we know the maximum number of people that can attend our AGM and can find a suitable venue accordingly (when in person AGMs resume, our last 2 have been via Zoom)
I'd have thought a simpler version of OMOV would be one John Reyes one vote
haha i like that idea
i feel the OMOV was brought up in one of the AGM.
I know my Fellow silver rep is very obsess with this but look at the figures
least then 40 members replied and Did not vote the way of the Members and voted None of the above because he has a issue with Mike Truran and others.
Also with the Block voting, i vote the way i'm told, but also while i can give a idea, some people don't vote what they are told and you can see that in the card vote.
i tried to work with my rep, but he don't respect the silver members, and i did tried talking to him and he was very rude to me and tried to talk me down, when i show him the proof, but what can you do?
he think the people in this forum don't talk sense.
He think he is better then me, but while he is a chess writer and used fancy words, he is not better then me.