Entirely agree. I can understand that £18 might be significant for those chess players reliant on State benefits, in low-income employment or otherwise financially limited but for most people here it's a pittance. Continued complaints about the ECF fees, even from players who can regularly afford to travel to weekend congresses, must be very dispiriting to many of those actually giving their time to promote chess.David Lettington wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:29 amA lot of people seem to be complaining about the cost of playing a sport that is incredibly cheap to participate in, compared to most other sports.
It costs £25 to take part in my local 10k run. It's £17 just to watch my local non-league football team. It's £11 to go swimming for 90 minutes at the local pool.
Annual membership of a national association for as little as £18 is a bargain, even if you only play a handful of rated games. Club memberships usually work out at a couple of pounds per week (or less). Congress entry fees are usually around £25 per day, which is very cheap for a day's participation in any kind of event.
ECF Membership Reform
-
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
The key question is not whether it is cheap or expensive (which depends on the individual), but whether it represents value for money. I would suggest not for many people. As an example, in the case of league chess it is hard to see how the ECF adds any value beyond grading, and that could, surely, be provided at much lower cost.
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: ECF Membership Reform
How depressing
It's hard enough being involved in chess administration (for free, whilst also having a job and a family), without someone trying to make it harder by suggesting that grading/rating could be done cheaper; just how much work does Brian and his team put into it, and those running the LMS?
If they (and the rest of us) charged commercial rates for our time, ECF membership would be over £18 per week, let alone per annum
It's hard enough being involved in chess administration (for free, whilst also having a job and a family), without someone trying to make it harder by suggesting that grading/rating could be done cheaper; just how much work does Brian and his team put into it, and those running the LMS?
If they (and the rest of us) charged commercial rates for our time, ECF membership would be over £18 per week, let alone per annum
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 1525
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:15 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
I don't think we can say the ECF is doing a good job because chess is cheap, any more than we can say the Equestrian Federation is doing a bad job because a horse costs 10k a year. (possibly, two minutes on google...)
I don't think grading can be done much cheaper than around a pound a member. But I do think value for money is important in some other areas.
I am looking forward seeing the finance council papers, the first update since the government grant so we might or might not see significant changes in thinking.
I don't think grading can be done much cheaper than around a pound a member. But I do think value for money is important in some other areas.
I am looking forward seeing the finance council papers, the first update since the government grant so we might or might not see significant changes in thinking.
-
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Actually, John, no. Whether it represents value for money does depend on the individual. I take it that, since you don't appear to be a member of the ECF, you won't be in a position to judge but quite a few members probably consider 'Chess Moves' alone to be worth £1.50 each month.John Townsend wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 4:50 pmThe key question is not whether it is cheap or expensive (which depends on the individual), but whether it represents value for money. I would suggest not for many people. As an example, in the case of league chess it is hard to see how the ECF adds any value beyond grading, and that could, surely, be provided at much lower cost.
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Paul Cooksey wrote:
"I don't think grading can be done much cheaper than around a pound a member. But I do think value for money is important in some other areas."
I don't follow Paul's argument here. If all that league players get for their £18 is grading, then aren't they, in effect, paying about eighteen times what it costs?
"I don't think grading can be done much cheaper than around a pound a member. But I do think value for money is important in some other areas."
I don't follow Paul's argument here. If all that league players get for their £18 is grading, then aren't they, in effect, paying about eighteen times what it costs?
-
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Well said.Mick Norris wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 4:57 pmHow depressing
It's hard enough being involved in chess administration (for free, whilst also having a job and a family), without someone trying to make it harder by suggesting that grading/rating could be done cheaper; just how much work does Brian and his team put into it, and those running the LMS?
If they (and the rest of us) charged commercial rates for our time, ECF membership would be over £18 per week, let alone per annum
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:51 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: ECF Membership Reform
i agreed with Mick there and you need to think what the money is used for?Richard Bates wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 1:39 pmWell said.Mick Norris wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 4:57 pmHow depressing
It's hard enough being involved in chess administration (for free, whilst also having a job and a family), without someone trying to make it harder by suggesting that grading/rating could be done cheaper; just how much work does Brian and his team put into it, and those running the LMS?
If they (and the rest of us) charged commercial rates for our time, ECF membership would be over £18 per week, let alone per annum
nothing is free
Any postings on here represent my personal views only and also Dyslexia as well
-
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
I can sympathise with John because it must be difficult following arguments when one really doesn't have a clue. As to "If all that league players get for their £18 is grading", I've already mentioned 'Chess Moves' and https://www.englishchess.org.uk/ecf-mem ... -benefits/ shows a list of other possible benefits. Not everyone will want to avail themselves of those benefits but they're there nonetheless. Then there's the role of ECF officers in obtaining the recent HMG grants where the assumption is that part of the benefits will accrue at grassroots level. The ECF also acts as a focal point for recruiting new players and it's very probable that, without a body such as the ECF, there would be fewer active players and consequently fewer leagues for people such as John, if he takes up chess again, to compete in. Of course, the ECF isn't perfect but we're better off with it - and, in particular, the volunteers who give up a good deal of time working on others' behalf - than without it.John Townsend wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:36 amPaul Cooksey wrote:
"I don't think grading can be done much cheaper than around a pound a member. But I do think value for money is important in some other areas."
I don't follow Paul's argument here. If all that league players get for their £18 is grading, then aren't they, in effect, paying about eighteen times what it costs?
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:51 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Absolutely agree. And the above doesn't include the need for an official body to organise our national representative teams. No doubt some club players have no interest in our national teams and don't see why they should support them financially. However, the proportion of the ridiculously cheap £18 p.a. which helps to fund international play is tiny. Anyway if the ECF didn't exist it wouldn't be long before a committee was formed to invent it.Roger Lancaster wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 9:47 pm
I can sympathise with John because it must be difficult following arguments when one really doesn't have a clue. As to "If all that league players get for their £18 is grading", I've already mentioned 'Chess Moves' and https://www.englishchess.org.uk/ecf-mem ... -benefits/ shows a list of other possible benefits. Not everyone will want to avail themselves of those benefits but they're there nonetheless. Then there's the role of ECF officers in obtaining the recent HMG grants where the assumption is that part of the benefits will accrue at grassroots level. The ECF also acts as a focal point for recruiting new players and it's very probable that, without a body such as the ECF, there would be fewer active players and consequently fewer leagues for people such as John, if he takes up chess again, to compete in. Of course, the ECF isn't perfect but we're better off with it - and, in particular, the volunteers who give up a good deal of time working on others' behalf - than without it.
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Thanks for the insult, Mr Lancaster. It is a pity we cannot discuss ECF matters without it. I assume it is an attempt to cover up the weakness of your argument.
League chess existed happily for many decades without the ECF, which has not added to the experience other than by increasing the cost. For grading, Paul Cooksey mentioned a cost to the ECF of "around a pound a member". That compares unfavourably with the £18 which I understand players are expected to pay. As for the magazine, I suspect many players, if given a choice, would prefer to have their membership cheaper, especially at a time when many are feeling the pinch.
League chess existed happily for many decades without the ECF, which has not added to the experience other than by increasing the cost. For grading, Paul Cooksey mentioned a cost to the ECF of "around a pound a member". That compares unfavourably with the £18 which I understand players are expected to pay. As for the magazine, I suspect many players, if given a choice, would prefer to have their membership cheaper, especially at a time when many are feeling the pinch.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
John Townsend wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:28 amAs for the magazine, I suspect many players, if given a choice, would prefer to have their membership cheaper, especially at a time when many are feeling the pinch.
I do wonder how much the magazine is costing. I recall that not so many years ago, the ECF cancelled the previous magazine as a cost saving measure.
-
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:30 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
A thread on membership reform should not be diverted by the cost of "grading" (rating since 2020), but any diversion into that area should not be anchored in Paul's estimate.John Townsend wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 9:28 am... For grading, Paul Cooksey mentioned a cost to the ECF of "around a pound a member".
The quotes we got for building LMS and the monthly rating system were material. At £1 per member these would still be being paid off if Malcolm Peacock and Steve Bush had not volunteered. On top of that, If not for the many brilliant volunteer results officers and the central teams, the commercial cost of rating would appear in the accounts and easily cover the £18 membership fee. Whether players put that value on it is another matter.
-
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
Mr Valentine,
The "diversion" arose because Messrs. Lettington and Lancaster spoke above about the £18 being a "bargain", and it is normal on the forum for views expressed to be challenged, if need be.
There seems a big difference between Paul Cooksey's "around a pound a member" and the kind of sums you are talking about.
The "diversion" arose because Messrs. Lettington and Lancaster spoke above about the £18 being a "bargain", and it is normal on the forum for views expressed to be challenged, if need be.
There seems a big difference between Paul Cooksey's "around a pound a member" and the kind of sums you are talking about.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: ECF Membership Reform
The difference is what's shown as a cost in the accounts and the cost of the volunteer services if they had to be paid for.John Townsend wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:51 amThere seems a big difference between Paul Cooksey's "around a pound a member" and the kind of sums you are talking about.