ECF Membership FAQs
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:04 pm
In case you haven't seen it
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/?page_id=18771
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/?page_id=18771
The independent home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
https://www.ecforum.org.uk/
Mick Norris wrote:In case you haven't seen it
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/?page_id=18771
This doesn't say whether the Paysubsonline.com system will cope with proportionate memberships.What will happen when my current membership expires?
You will receive a notification telling you that your membership is about to expire. If we have an e-mail address for you, this will be sent by e-mail; otherwise, it will be posted to you.
You will then have the choice of the level of membership at which you wish to renew: Bronze, Silver, Gold or Platinum.
The renewal subscription will be based on a renewal date of 31 August to bring your membership into line with the new fixed ECF membership year (1 Sept – 31 Aug). The prices quoted will be based on the number of months remaining from expiry of your current membership until 31 August. For example, if your membership expires in December 2012, the rates will be 8/12ths of the respective annual subscription, to cover the eight months Jan-Aug 2013.
I don't see there's any "need" about it at all. If the organisation expects everyone to play at least 6 games, then eventually they will all become members, even if the organisation has to use foul means to achieve this. So the estimate of Game Fee is zero. If the league results haven't been submitted, the ECF has no way of knowing how many games have been played by "yet to be members".For non-MOs, the league or association will need to pay the ECF in mid-December. One practical solution would be to ask for a deposit of, say, £12 from each player in graded events who is not (and intends not to be) an ECF member. Above £12, the player would be well advised to consider Bronze membership.
Looks a different shall we say "level" of site compared to what was mentioned at the AGM doesn't itRoger de Coverly wrote:It appears the online system is going to cost the ECF almost £ 1 per £12 membership - see
https://paysubsonline.com/membershipman ... icing.aspx
3.95% plus 50p
Could you refresh the collective memory on what was mentioned at the AGM? Was trying to find out when this company started and how long it has been operating. Couldn't find anything on their website, other than contact details for a farm in Hartfield, East Sussex.Carl Hibbard wrote:Looks a different shall we say "level" of site compared to what was mentioned at the AGM doesn't itRoger de Coverly wrote:It appears the online system is going to cost the ECF almost £ 1 per £12 membership - see
https://paysubsonline.com/membershipman ... icing.aspx
3.95% plus 50p
We were told - actually at the Finance meeting in April rather than the AGM - that cVent would provide and host the software.Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Could you refresh the collective memory on what was mentioned at the AGM? Was trying to find out when this company started and how long it has been operating. Couldn't find anything on their website, other than contact details for a farm in Hartfield, East Sussex.Carl Hibbard wrote:Looks a different shall we say "level" of site compared to what was mentioned at the AGM doesn't itRoger de Coverly wrote:It appears the online system is going to cost the ECF almost £ 1 per £12 membership - see
https://paysubsonline.com/membershipman ... icing.aspx
3.95% plus 50p
Membership FAQs wrote:When will the online system be available?
Paysubsonline are in the process of completing some final enhancements to ensure that the system meets the specific needs of the ECF. The ‘live’ date is scheduled for 16 July 2012, although it is possible that we may be able to launch during the preceding week.
Various blogs come up on a Google search, for instanceChristopher Kreuzer wrote: Couldn't find anything on their website, other than contact details for a farm in Hartfield, East Sussex.
which reads like a Google translate and makes the usual amount of sense.Ever wondered precisely how things are going for your business if you make by using available on the internet program throughout your company’s purchases? Maybe you have expanded weary with handling the business’ single-handedly with no assist associated with scientific improvements throughout business? When you nonetheless really need to convince all by yourself while you’re corporate panel about having your enterprise online, bring to mind many of the advantage that the regular membership software program proposed by PaySubsOnline can provide.
Is this "The Sports Business"?paysubsonline.com (a trading name of The Sports Business),
The farm itself is home to a number of small businesses.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: But is this:
http://www.thesportsbusiness.com/index.php
And trying to find out more about that, I ran up against a blank wall.
There's also info at http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk. The company appears to have changed its name on 22 May 2012 (just over a month ago) from 'HOLIDAY-REUNION.COM LIMITED' and to have been dormant in recent years. It makes one wonder about the pedigree of the software and the make up of the customer base.Roger de Coverly wrote:But the domain itself seems to be this one
http://website.informer.com/Dave+Evans+ ... m+Ltd.html which leads to
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/04377031
That's a pet hate of a number of people. If you required to use a website that you go to once every three years, how do you recall a login and password? Even if you've told the computer to remember it, you may well have changed computer. So you end up having to write them all down (security risk) or use the same or similar id and password across multiple systems.Access to each member’s profile is controlled by an individual login and password. If a member needs to update any of the information in his or her profile (e.g. to record a change of address or e-mail address), this can be done at any time by using the login and password to access the existing record.
In passing, current thinking is that the former is better. The risk of someone breaking into your house to steal strong passwords being much lower than the risk of weak/ shared passwords being compromised online.Roger de Coverly wrote:So you end up having to write them all down (security risk) or use the same or similar id and password across multiple systems.