An excellent planNeil Graham wrote:As Mr Giddins has developed a number of derogatory sobriquets for his "favourite" posters on here are we now to refer to him as "Pip-squeak?"
OMOV or an elected Council?
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: OMOV or an elected Council?
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 21315
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: OMOV or an elected Council?
If any of Mr G's moles are amongst the nearly 900 registered users, they could easily enough establish that far more than 88 people have posted to the forum. Even if you look down the names of those not posting, there are many familiar ones.you know who wrote:which reveal that out of 888 registered users, 800 have never posted anything at all!
I think it can make sense, even for observers to register, since then features like "view new posts" or "view unread posts" can work.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Re: OMOV or an elected Council?
Carl Hibbard wrote:Despite the inaccurate post of pip-squeak Giddins which he seems unable to correct it does appear 613 members have posted at least one post and we still get around 2,000 unique visitors per dayIan Kingston wrote:That was David Robertson, I think, in the '100,000 posts' thread.Neil Graham wrote:The membership of this board might give some clues. Someone (Ian Kingston I think) gave some useful analysis.
An inaccuracy he has just repeated. Does he not get why he is wrong or is he relying on his readership not fact checking him?
AKA Scott Stone
"Give a man fire and he's warm for a day, set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."
That's Mr Stone to you, f**kface.
"Give a man fire and he's warm for a day, set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life."
That's Mr Stone to you, f**kface.
-
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm
Re: OMOV or an elected Council?
Although David started the thread, it was your own useful analysis at the foot of Page 1 I was thinking of.Ian Kingston wrote:That was David Robertson, I think, in the '100,000 posts' thread.Neil Graham wrote:The membership of this board might give some clues. Someone (Ian Kingston I think) gave some useful analysis.