Re: ABERYSTWYTH - ARE YOU GOING?
Posted: Wed May 14, 2014 9:40 pm
Alan Brusey would be a reasonable choice if he's willing: he and Keith don't live all that far apart, and it would be a top-half v bottom-half pairing.
The independent home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
https://www.ecforum.org.uk/
18th September 1994 with the Olympiad scheduled for November or December. So about the same length of time although possibly the rumours started earlier.Stewart Reuben wrote:Greece to Moscow there was much more advance notice.
Ah, their four game match, with game 2 counting as also the game for the British. Anand won 2.5-1.5. Assuming that was Anand's first match, there is a useful trivial pursuits (chess) question.Stewart Reuben wrote:Not changing the subject. Keith needs an opponent to play the first round of the British in advance. Any ideas?
There is precedence. Round 1 in 1987 Anand played Levitt in advance. Where was the British held? In Swansea. ...
Stewart Reuben wrote: The fact that Vishy didn't later turn up was unfortunate.
Now, now, let's have no hint here about what ordinary people are saying away from the forum ....Richard Bates wrote:Or alternatively the British could just be run without David Howell...
Anderton-Sasikiran in 1997 as well, I think.Stewart Reuben wrote:Not changing the subject. Keith needs an opponent to play the first round of the British in advance. Any ideas?
There is precedence. Round 1 in 1987 Anand played Levitt in advance. Where was the British held? In Swansea. The fact that Vishy didn't later turn up was unfortunate.
I wouldn't say it didn't happen, but Sasikiran was present in Hove on the first Sunday, because I played him in the rapid-play.Ian Thompson wrote: Anderton-Sasikiran in 1997 as well, I think.
Ian is correct. It was Anderton who was unavailable for Round 1Roger de Coverly wrote:I wouldn't say it didn't happen, but Sasikiran was present in Hove on the first Sunday, because I played him in the rapid-play.Ian Thompson wrote: Anderton-Sasikiran in 1997 as well, I think.
Perhaps they should have. It certainly looks that way now. However, when they won they knew exactly what they were expected to do, and were confident that they could do it. The time to complain was in 2010, not now.Stewart Reuben wrote: Norway should have refused to hold the World Cup.
This year's calendar is looking rather uncertain with the U16 Olympiad unlikely to take place and the World Youth in doubt. Fingers crossed that the World Schools in Brazil and the EU Youth (still without regulations) will be organised.NickFaulks wrote:Perhaps they should have. It certainly looks that way now. However, when they won they knew exactly what they were expected to do, and were confident that they could do it. The time to complain was in 2010, not now.Stewart Reuben wrote: Norway should have refused to hold the World Cup.
Adams. And also Hodgson and Penrose, but they're inactive. I can't think of any others off the top of my head.Kevin Thurlow wrote:"Aberystwyth has hosted the British Championships on two previous occasions, in 1955, when Harry Golombek won his third title, and in 1961 when Jonathan Penrose took his fourth."
This seems like a good omen for someone who has won the title 4 times already... I can't be bothered to look up who's in that category.