Page 1 of 1
Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:10 pm
by Neill Cooper
I have just enjoyed playing two county correspondence games in the 'Ward Higgs' county championships
Since I won and drew without using a computer chess engine (which is allowed) I assume I was lucky and my opponent did the same.
The cross stable is at
https://www.iccf.com/event?id=45571
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:12 pm
by Kevin Thurlow
Wrong forum surely? ECF has nothing to do with Ward-Higgs. It's organised by BFCC, soon to be EFCC.
Incidentally, ICCF recently saw the worst game of postal chess ever. 1.d4 g5, 2.c4 f6, What did white play now? Let's not always see the same hands...
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:25 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Kevin Thurlow wrote:Wrong forum surely? ECF has nothing to do with Ward-Higgs. It's organised by BFCC, soon to be EFCC.
The ECF still claims oversight , according to its website.
Controller, County & District Correspondence Chess Championships
This event is being run by the BFCC
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:34 pm
by Neill Cooper
Kevin Thurlow wrote:Wrong forum surely? ECF has nothing to do with Ward-Higgs. It's organised by BFCC, soon to be EFCC.
"The ECF have now requested that the BFCC (British Federation for Correspondence Chess
http://www.bfcc-online.org.uk/) organise and run this event."
http://www.englishchess.org.uk/counties ... -relaunch/
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:23 pm
by Clive Blackburn
Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Incidentally, ICCF recently saw the worst game of postal chess ever. 1.d4 g5, 2.c4 f6, What did white play now? Let's not always see the same hands...
Maybe 3.e4 threatening Qh5 mate
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:59 pm
by David Shepherd
Kevin Thurlow wrote:Wrong forum surely? ECF has nothing to do with Ward-Higgs.
Why is this the wrong forum - doesn't the post relate to an aspect of English Chess. This isn't the English Chess Federations forum.
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:00 pm
by Carl Hibbard
David Shepherd wrote:Kevin Thurlow wrote:Wrong forum surely? ECF has nothing to do with Ward-Higgs.[/ quote]
Why is this the wrong forum - doesn't the post relate to an aspect of English Chess. This isn't the English Chess Federations forum.
Is this ever the wrong forum?
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:05 pm
by Mick Norris
The question was wrong section of this forum I think i.e. should the post have been under ECF matters
Do we think the ECF Forum will last 8 years?

Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:11 pm
by Carl Hibbard
Mick Norris wrote:The question was wrong section of this forum I think i.e. should the post have been under ECF matters
Do we think the ECF Forum will last 8 years?

Andrew Martins youtube clip adverts may retain top post status over there for that long yes

Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 8:28 am
by Kevin Thurlow
It would help if I typed the right move 2, not too complicated one would think, the game actually went 1d4 g5, 2.e4 f6...
And to clarify something that isn't my fault, ECF decided they were not interested in the Ward-Higgs, and asked BFCC to run it.
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:49 am
by Clive Blackburn
Clive Blackburn wrote:Kevin Thurlow wrote:
Incidentally, ICCF recently saw the worst game of postal chess ever. 1.d4 g5, 2.c4 f6, What did white play now? Let's not always see the same hands...
Maybe 3.e4 threatening Qh5 mate
Kevin Thurlow wrote:It would help if I typed the right move 2, not too complicated one would think, the game actually went 1d4 g5, 2.e4 f6...
Ah well in that case Qh5 is mate after only 3 moves!
Find it hard to believe that was a correspondence game!

Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:16 pm
by Kevin Thurlow
"Ah well in that case Qh5 is mate after only 3 moves!

"
I agree - both players were new to CC, but even so... My first thought was that it was a strange sort of protest.
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:50 am
by David Sedgwick
Kevin Thurlow wrote:And to clarify something that isn't my fault, ECF decided they were not interested in the Ward-Higgs, and asked BFCC to run it.
I fail to see how handing over the organisation to an affiliated organisation with the necessary skills demonstrates a lack of interest in the event. On the contrary, I would have thought that it demonstrated a desire to ensure its continuation.
Re: Counties & District Correspondence Chess Championship
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:24 am
by Kevin Thurlow
"I fail to see how handing over the organisation to an affiliated organisation with the necessary skills demonstrates a lack of interest in the event. On the contrary, I would have thought that it demonstrated a desire to ensure its continuation."
Yes - you could see it as an improvement. I think BFCC were a bit grumpy that ECF had run it for years and told BFCC to keep out of it, then suddenly said "we don't want it". The WH is now where it belongs, and the use of servers is an improvement of course. It stops you making a typo and losing in 3 moves!