Angus, you appear to be comparing to a cost of zero (i.e. if the chess library were sold off completely). Isn't the correct comparison to the cost of continued storage? Isn't another way to look at it to think that the cost of storing the chess library is the same (just a different location), but the office cost is going up? You are getting more office space as well.Angus French wrote:Additional cost from time before storage agreement entered into: £3,526 + £4,672 = £8,198Mike Truran wrote:Current office costs: £7,408
Current storage costs: £3,526
Total current costs: £10,934
First floor office costs: £15,606
Additional cost: £4,672.
National Chess Library closure
-
- Posts: 8838
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: National Chess Library closure
-
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
Re: National Chess Library closure
I'm looking at the total costs associated with the Library (when this was hosted, for the most part, at Hasting University - but also, if I recall, partly at David Anderton's home - the cost was £0).Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Angus, you appear to be comparing to a cost of zero (i.e. if the chess library were sold off completely). Isn't the correct comparison to the cost of continued storage?Angus French wrote:Additional cost from time before storage agreement entered into: £3,526 + £4,672 = £8,198Mike Truran wrote:Current office costs: £7,408
Current storage costs: £3,526
Total current costs: £10,934
First floor office costs: £15,606
Additional cost: £4,672.
I certainly don't think the current storage cost should be accepted as a given. In my view the library needs to be catalogued and then rationalised (while I appreciate this is difficult to do I don't think it should be beyond the wit of the Board to organise).
Last edited by Angus French on Thu Mar 09, 2017 11:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8838
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: National Chess Library closure
True, but once you take on the additional office space to store the library, and then catalogue and review the library, and save space by selling or otherwise disposing of, you are left with empty storage space that you are still paying for in rent (as opposed to storage space you can stop paying for). The office might end up with empty loft space, it might not. There is no way to know until a proper review of the collection is done.Roger de Coverly wrote:Surely it must be possible to defray part of the cost of maintaining a library by selling parts off to collectors. You could even save space by dumping the worthless. But that's not going to happen until it's stored in a manner that facilitates cataloguing and review.
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
With rented accommodation, you can always downsize. I think the ECF did this as part of cost cutting following the loss of the DCMS grant.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: you are left with empty storage space that you are still paying for in rent
-
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
Re: National Chess Library closure
The proposal is to take out a ten-year lease. How easy would it be to downsize from a contractual agreement?Roger de Coverly wrote:With rented accommodation, you can always downsize. I think the ECF did this as part of cost cutting following the loss of the DCMS grant.Christopher Kreuzer wrote: you are left with empty storage space that you are still paying for in rent
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Break points would be built in, as is customary with leases like this.
-
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Is there a good reason for not attempting to either sell or dump the duplicates? That applies particularly to books that everyone of a certain age has on their bookshelves where there's no obvious reason to retain the only known copies.Angus French wrote: Note the quantity of duplicates.
Unless there are legacy conditions that preclude it, selling books previously owned by someone well known might get a better price.
-
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
No there isn't, and that is what we will probably do when time and resource permit (and once we can get decent access to the books).
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Identifying duplicates which might be sold off is just the first stage before getting to actually sell them. And, in case anyone believes selling off surplus books and magazines would result in a financial bonanza to the ECF, I’ll just counsel (as someone who sells a fair amount of material on eBay) that selling off low-value items is not a particularly lucrative business. It takes, by and large, almost as much time to list or catalogue a low-value item as a high-value item and – by the time you factor in the cost of the worker’s time – you can easily find yourself left with a negative number.
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
I would hope the ECF would be sufficiently hard headed that it would file duplicate books that were unlikely to sell with the waste paper collection. But is there added value in a widely available second hand book if it had been previously owned by, say, Golombek ? They've got multiple copies of Golombek authored books flagged as having been part of the "Golombek" collection.Roger Lancaster wrote:Identifying duplicates which might be sold off is just the first stage before getting to actually sell them.
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Take it from me, Roger, it's hard to predict what is going to sell and what isn't. I've listed (maybe I shouldn't confess this!) items I've considered junk on eBay and they've sold - occasionally, with two or three bidders competing at a price I thought totally unrealistic. Conversely, what I've considered worthwhile has been ignored by others.
You make a fair point about books with well-known previous owners although books formerly owned by non-chess celebrities would probably command much higher prices than by those who were widely known and respected only within chess circles. I suspect the former category won't be much represented in the ECF collection.
You make a fair point about books with well-known previous owners although books formerly owned by non-chess celebrities would probably command much higher prices than by those who were widely known and respected only within chess circles. I suspect the former category won't be much represented in the ECF collection.
-
- Posts: 8472
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
I would be very surprised if you couldn't find volunteers keen to do the job.Roger Lancaster wrote: by the time you factor in the cost of the worker’s time
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2015 2:44 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Maybe, Nick, although they also need to be reasonably knowledgeable - to state the obvious, any item needs to be fairly and reasonably accurately described in any sales document.
-
- Posts: 21321
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: National Chess Library closure
Much of it is the books some of which have been on player's bookshelves for the last fifty or sixty years.Roger Lancaster wrote: any item needs to be fairly and reasonably accurately described in any sales document.
The listing that Angus made available contains an indicator to mark duplicates. Counting this gives 2526 duplicates out of 6587 items, so the collection could potentially be reduced in size by 38%.