More outspoken, this I look forward to reading.Mick Norris wrote:The other document is a bit more outspoken
It reminds me of Nigel Farage saying yesterday that now he is no longer constrained by party office he will feel free to speak his mind!
More outspoken, this I look forward to reading.Mick Norris wrote:The other document is a bit more outspoken
Me too. The first was, shall we say, interesting!NickFaulks wrote:More outspoken, this I look forward to reading.Mick Norris wrote:The other document is a bit more outspoken
Like most, I haven't been privileged to seen it.Michael Farthing wrote:It strikes me that Carl should agree to publication.
The only person whose reputation can possibly be damaged (if it hasn't already reached its nadir) is that of the author. And I don't think you can libel yourself.
That has been done, and the Governance Committee chairman and one of the NEDs have discussed its contents in detail with selected ECF directors.Should it be passed to the Governance Committee for them to examine possible allegations that might be levelled at current or past board members?
How have so many people seen this second document?Andrew Zigmond wrote:It is an interesting read. For a relatively short document there is one hell of a lot to pick over as well.
If you consider seeking nomination as an ECF Director and send material in support of your case to most or all organisations represented at the ECF AGM, there is every reason to suppose that what you write will not be confidential to the recipients.Carl Hibbard wrote: How have so many people seen this second document?
Well, now we've read that extremely important story from years gone by, I guess we're well-informed enough to do just that.Gary Kenworthy wrote: Can we now get on with the business in hand please?
rgds GK