The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
-
- Posts: 4640
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm
The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
It would be worthwhile if we would agree what it is for (popularity? Selfless devotion to promoting chess? Competitive success, by some relative measurement?), if there were an obvious way of shortlisting and if there were wide interest among the membership in voting. Also, perhaps, if the prospect of winning it might spur potential winners onto greater things (as opposed to encouraging only parents to get involved with campaigns for their own children or for the children of others).
But none of these apply, and having tried and failed at attending all of the above for quite some time now, I suggest we should scrap it. Every year there are complaints about the shortlisting or voting patterns, and we can be thankful that this year it has been suspended this year before the ECF lost further credibility.
What would we lose, apart from extra forum threads twice per year, and the odd blog by Justin (and even he seems busy enough to survive without commenting on it these days)?
By way of comparison, I offer the 4NCL experience. For a few years, 1998-2001 or thereabouts, they ran votes for player of the year, manager of the year, best game of the year. For a while it worked, and the awards accompanied a start of season dinner for those who liked to dress up. But then the dinner went, and it was just the vote; and then fewer people voted. I recall that everyone we (Barbican, with three votes for three teams) voted for in 2001 won their section, and I did wonder who else actually voted (and whether we might have won some sections ourselves, if we hadn't given so many votes for other people!).
So what happened next? Well, the votes and awards were scrapped too ... and life went on quite easily.
Isn't this the simplest answer - If people won't bother to vote, there shouldn't be awards?
But none of these apply, and having tried and failed at attending all of the above for quite some time now, I suggest we should scrap it. Every year there are complaints about the shortlisting or voting patterns, and we can be thankful that this year it has been suspended this year before the ECF lost further credibility.
What would we lose, apart from extra forum threads twice per year, and the odd blog by Justin (and even he seems busy enough to survive without commenting on it these days)?
By way of comparison, I offer the 4NCL experience. For a few years, 1998-2001 or thereabouts, they ran votes for player of the year, manager of the year, best game of the year. For a while it worked, and the awards accompanied a start of season dinner for those who liked to dress up. But then the dinner went, and it was just the vote; and then fewer people voted. I recall that everyone we (Barbican, with three votes for three teams) voted for in 2001 won their section, and I did wonder who else actually voted (and whether we might have won some sections ourselves, if we hadn't given so many votes for other people!).
So what happened next? Well, the votes and awards were scrapped too ... and life went on quite easily.
Isn't this the simplest answer - If people won't bother to vote, there shouldn't be awards?
-
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
- Location: Morecambe, Europe
-
- Posts: 8806
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
You have to have sustained interest both from those giving the awards and those receiving them. What helps is things like: prestige, monetary awards, and publicity. If the ECF had something like an Annual Dinner to go with its AGM, and sponsorship, then the award might regain some of the status it once had (did it have such status in previous years?).
Out of interest, does anyone know if any actual awarding ceremonies take place or if any certificates or trophy-like commemorative objects are produced? If all you have is some sort of voting, and an announcing of the results, and an entry filled in on a webpage and/or an entry in the Yearbook (if that still exists), then I am not surprise it has declined.
Out of interest, does anyone know if any actual awarding ceremonies take place or if any certificates or trophy-like commemorative objects are produced? If all you have is some sort of voting, and an announcing of the results, and an entry filled in on a webpage and/or an entry in the Yearbook (if that still exists), then I am not surprise it has declined.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Not sure I ever did, though my memory may betray me. Jonathan certainly has been known to.Jonathan Rogers wrote: What would we lose, apart from extra forum threads twice per year, and the odd blog by Justin (and even he seems busy enough to survive without commenting on it these days)?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
I'm against!
Thin end of the wedge. Slippery slope. Don't give 'em an inch. The minute you scrap Player of the Year, they'll be straight in with Arbiter of the Year
Thin end of the wedge. Slippery slope. Don't give 'em an inch. The minute you scrap Player of the Year, they'll be straight in with Arbiter of the Year
-
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
- Location: Morecambe, Europe
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Umm.
And then Organiser of the Year...
And then Nexus of the Year...
And then Organiser of the Year...
And then Nexus of the Year...
-
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:45 pm
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Arbiers/ organisers already have a prize for best contribution to running the British Championships: it's called the Boxall Plate.
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Piled high with piesMike Gunn wrote:it's called the Boxall Plate.
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Web site?Michael Farthing wrote:Umm.
And then Organiser of the Year...
And then Nexus of the Year...
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Michael Farthing wrote:Umm.
And then Organiser of the Year...
And then Nexus of the Year...
And Governance Committee Member of the Year...
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
- Location: Morecambe, Europe
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
It would seem you are party to unannounced infomationJohn Upham wrote:
And Governance Committee Member of the Year...
-
- Posts: 7179
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
I have many friends in low places.Michael Farthing wrote:It would seem you are party to unannounced infomationJohn Upham wrote:
And Governance Committee Member of the Year...
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess
-
- Posts: 3600
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
I don't think the award should be scrapped, because it is a good way of focusing attention on the successes of the previous year. I am not terribly bothered who wins.
-
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
Christopher Kreuzer wrote:Out of interest, does anyone know if any actual awarding ceremonies take place or if any certificates or trophy-like commemorative objects are produced?
I don’t know about now but many moons ago - this would have been 2007/2008 or thereabouts the S&B Blog won website of the year. This was back when it was still the S&B Chess Club Blog - and Peter Sowray came to a club night one evening and awarded a certificate I think/ I’m not sure 100% sure any more.
I must admit I have always thought that all awards from the Oscars down are a little silly. Is this player more deserving than that one? Is this film better than that one? Would you rather have steak and kidney pie or apple crumble? The only sensible answer is always going to be, "well, it depends".
That said, as long as everybody treats it as the bit of fun that it is, I don’t really see the harm - as long as the award giver doesn’t make themselves look foolish along the way.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:16 am
Re: The case for scrapping "Player of the Year"
If you have awards you need to do it properly. I would have been livid if a Chelsea player had not won a player of the year award.
Personally I think it is a service that ought to be done properly as part of membership. So why not make refunds for those that voted (£5 seems fine to me).
Otherwise we ought to seek the resignation of the awards committee which seems the way democracy and mob rule works.
It has been a very bad week.
Personally I think it is a service that ought to be done properly as part of membership. So why not make refunds for those that voted (£5 seems fine to me).
Otherwise we ought to seek the resignation of the awards committee which seems the way democracy and mob rule works.
It has been a very bad week.