With all this drama and melody revolving around the grading system
I thought this might be of interest.
Whilst waiting for the games to finsh at the current Edinburgh FIDE tournament.
(ends today - designed to get players IM norms - no luck there but there
have been some excellent games especially by McNab and Greet).
Dalily reports and all the games.
http://www.chessedinburgh.co.uk/chandler.php
Anyway....
Whilst waiting for the games to finsh at the current Edinburgh FIDE tournament.
I browsed the old CHESS magazines. Not the bound book but the original magazines.
December 1952 and Ken Whyld writes a rather lengthy letter putting forward
a case and a method for grading players using the 3 digit method in place today.
"The two mechanical difficulties are:
(1) Finding the right system.
(2) Finding WIlling Workers."
He then goes on to add that (1) can be solved by imagination and some
trail and error (some things never change)
(2) will be solved by distributing the work.
January 1953.
A lad calling himself 'King's Pawn' is against it whilst Hugh Courtney is all for it.
A bloke called H.W.Tharp claims it is his system that Whyld quotes with a few changes.
February 1953
Mr. Cozens is for it as is a Mr.Toms.
Also in this issue a reader, John Barrs, suggest CHESS a 'BY Yourself' feature
scoring points for moves. Chess took it up next month.
This later turned into 'How Good is Your Chess?'
Not got onto March 1953 yet as these old magazine are so interesting.
Pity the tournament ends today. I was going to start looking at our full set
of BCM's.
Also noted a certain L.W.Barden reporting on the Helsinki International.
(October 1952) "...with insight, accuracy and wit."
Indeed, some things never change.