Hastings 1895

Historical knowledge and information regarding our great game.
Post Reply
Tim Harding
Posts: 2390
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Contact:

Hastings 1895

Post by Tim Harding » Mon Oct 05, 2026 10:01 pm

As some of you may be aware, there are problems with many game scores of one of the most important early English international tournaments.

None of the four (!) tournament books on Hastings 1895 are entirely reliable, nor any database (as I warned John Saunders of Britbase a while back).

Finally I am finding time to write up some of my findings in a series of articles on my website.

The introductory articles are up and also a discussion of the problem games in Round One was added today.

https://chessmail.com/history/Hastings1 ... index.html

This is probably not my final word on the subject but I am throwing it open for study and debate.

[EDIT: Some links were missing but are now fixed. I am working on the Round 2 and 3 articles now for posting later this week.]
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter

Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com

User avatar
Gerard Killoran
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
Contact:

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by Gerard Killoran » Fri Oct 09, 2026 3:25 pm

This was new to me, was it in the tournament book too?

The_Sketch_21_August_1895_0039.jpg
The_Sketch_21_August_1895_0039.jpg (809.43 KiB) Viewed 150 times
A 'miserable worm' - Nigel Short

John Townsend
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by John Townsend » Fri Oct 09, 2026 4:11 pm

https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/ext ... inder.html shows, under "Hastings, 1895 (rare group photograph)", that the picture has been discussed in seven Chess Notes items.

User avatar
Gerard Killoran
Posts: 1321
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
Contact:

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by Gerard Killoran » Fri Oct 09, 2026 5:52 pm

John Townsend wrote: ↑
Fri Oct 09, 2026 4:11 pm
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/ext ... inder.html shows, under "Hastings, 1895 (rare group photograph)", that the picture has been discussed in seven Chess Notes items.
Odd that it was thought to be rare having been published in The Sketch.
A 'miserable worm' - Nigel Short

John Townsend
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by John Townsend » Fri Oct 09, 2026 7:32 pm

Not odd at all, given the sequence of the seven C.N. items (published between 2006 and 2016).

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10981
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Fri Oct 09, 2026 8:22 pm

The "high-resolution" image given here:

https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pic ... stings.jpg

...as part of C.N. 10254, has what might be a photographer signature in the bottom left corner.

S. Wainjic (better attempts needed to read it!).

It might seem unlikely that the original has survived after all this time, but that might be worth following up.

John Townsend
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by John Townsend » Fri Oct 09, 2026 10:55 pm

There seem to be a few abentees from the photograph, including James Mason. Can we infer that the photograph session clashed with the Hastings licensing hours?

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10981
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Hastings 1895

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Fri Oct 09, 2026 11:29 pm

Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑
Fri Oct 09, 2026 8:22 pm
The "high-resolution" image given here:

https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pic ... stings.jpg

...as part of C.N. 10254, has what might be a photographer signature in the bottom left corner.

S. Wainjic (better attempts needed to read it!).

It might seem unlikely that the original has survived after all this time, but that might be worth following up.
Solving my own question, this is an engraving signature (the photograph was prepared for publication as an engraving) using the "company" signature for the workshop founded by prominent wood-engraver Joseph Swain:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Swain_(engraver)

https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG47819

The signature reads: "Swain sc" (= Swain sculpsit = either Swain or more likely one of his workshop assistants).

(The photograph, as given in the newspaper, was from the G. W. Bradshaw studio.)

Post Reply