Hastings 1895
-
Tim Harding
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Contact:
Hastings 1895
As some of you may be aware, there are problems with many game scores of one of the most important early English international tournaments.
None of the four (!) tournament books on Hastings 1895 are entirely reliable, nor any database (as I warned John Saunders of Britbase a while back).
Finally I am finding time to write up some of my findings in a series of articles on my website.
The introductory articles are up and also a discussion of the problem games in Round One was added today.
https://chessmail.com/history/Hastings1 ... index.html
This is probably not my final word on the subject but I am throwing it open for study and debate.
[EDIT: Some links were missing but are now fixed. I am working on the Round 2 and 3 articles now for posting later this week.]
None of the four (!) tournament books on Hastings 1895 are entirely reliable, nor any database (as I warned John Saunders of Britbase a while back).
Finally I am finding time to write up some of my findings in a series of articles on my website.
The introductory articles are up and also a discussion of the problem games in Round One was added today.
https://chessmail.com/history/Hastings1 ... index.html
This is probably not my final word on the subject but I am throwing it open for study and debate.
[EDIT: Some links were missing but are now fixed. I am working on the Round 2 and 3 articles now for posting later this week.]
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
- Gerard Killoran
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Hastings 1895
This was new to me, was it in the tournament book too?
A 'miserable worm' - Nigel Short
-
John Townsend
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: Hastings 1895
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/ext ... inder.html shows, under "Hastings, 1895 (rare group photograph)", that the picture has been discussed in seven Chess Notes items.
- Gerard Killoran
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Hastings 1895
Odd that it was thought to be rare having been published in The Sketch.John Townsend wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2026 4:11 pmhttps://www.chesshistory.com/winter/ext ... inder.html shows, under "Hastings, 1895 (rare group photograph)", that the picture has been discussed in seven Chess Notes items.
A 'miserable worm' - Nigel Short
-
John Townsend
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: Hastings 1895
Not odd at all, given the sequence of the seven C.N. items (published between 2006 and 2016).
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Hastings 1895
The "high-resolution" image given here:
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pic ... stings.jpg
...as part of C.N. 10254, has what might be a photographer signature in the bottom left corner.
S. Wainjic (better attempts needed to read it!).
It might seem unlikely that the original has survived after all this time, but that might be worth following up.
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pic ... stings.jpg
...as part of C.N. 10254, has what might be a photographer signature in the bottom left corner.
S. Wainjic (better attempts needed to read it!).
It might seem unlikely that the original has survived after all this time, but that might be worth following up.
-
John Townsend
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
Re: Hastings 1895
There seem to be a few abentees from the photograph, including James Mason. Can we infer that the photograph session clashed with the Hastings licensing hours?
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10981
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Hastings 1895
Solving my own question, this is an engraving signature (the photograph was prepared for publication as an engraving) using the "company" signature for the workshop founded by prominent wood-engraver Joseph Swain:Christopher Kreuzer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2026 8:22 pmThe "high-resolution" image given here:
https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/pic ... stings.jpg
...as part of C.N. 10254, has what might be a photographer signature in the bottom left corner.
S. Wainjic (better attempts needed to read it!).
It might seem unlikely that the original has survived after all this time, but that might be worth following up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Swain_(engraver)
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG47819
The signature reads: "Swain sc" (= Swain sculpsit = either Swain or more likely one of his workshop assistants).
(The photograph, as given in the newspaper, was from the G. W. Bradshaw studio.)