If we are counting FIDE titles only, that has to be a contender.JustinHorton wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 11:52 amChessgames has Botvinnik losing to Kopilov in the 1951 USSR Championship, though Kopilov "became a chess master of the USSR in 1946".
Chess history trivia
-
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Chess history trivia
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Chess history trivia
I don't see why not, there are plenty of other players in the tournament crosstables (he writes, with his copy of Cafferty and Taimanov on his lap) I've never heard of.John Moore wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2020 5:06 pmI doubt that anyone who qualified for the USSR Championship Final fits the bill.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 2226
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 6:33 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Really, you surprise me.
-
- Posts: 2321
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
Re: Chess history trivia
Agreed. The earliest loss by Steinitz (not in a simul) in my database was nearly three years after the World Championship match against Zukertort.IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:48 pmThat is... a very difficult question to answer for a number of reasons. (For example, "untitled player" is not well-defined before 1950.)MJMcCready wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:43 pmI'm only throwing it in because I don't know the answer, but excluding simuls, who was the first amateur player or untitled player if you like, or someone unknown to beat the official world champion of the day?
In a series of friendly games against Vincent Martinez Carvajal in Havana, Steinitz lost a game played on 11 January 1889. He annotated it in International Chess Magazine, volume 5 (Feb 1889) on pages 55-56.
It's possible he lost other casual or simul games before that.
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
Historian and FIDE Arbiter
Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com
-
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Chess history trivia
I came to the identical conclusion as Tim a few days ago, but didn't get round to a Forum post.Tim Harding wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2020 2:49 pm
Agreed. The earliest loss by Steinitz (not in a simul) in my database was nearly three years after the World Championship match against Zukertort.
In a series of friendly games against Vincent Martinez Carvajal in Havana, Steinitz lost a game played on 11 January 1889. He annotated it in International Chess Magazine, volume 5 (Feb 1889) on pages 55-56.
It's possible he lost other casual or simul games before that.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1718650
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Perhaps then I ought modify the question and make it tougher. Which -assuming it has ever happened- was the first world champion to lose to what was described as 'a local player' So not a Maestro, First or Second rank Amateur, I mean a player known for playing at his club only and not extending his endeavors beyond that. It's happened countless times in simuls but some 'local players' were much stronger than was reported on. William Ward was only ever described as an amateur yet he came 2nd in the British Championship 3 times. I do believe in more recent time when Gallagher became British champion has played in a club match for whoever I can't remember but it was his 190 opponent that claimed victory not him. There is, I suppose, the additional problem of perspective. Tal's first loss as champion was to a man call Florencio Camponanes, who at the time, may have been thought as just 'some local player'.
-
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
"I do believe in more recent time when Gallagher became British champion has played in a club match for whoever I can't remember but it was his 190 opponent that claimed victory not him. There is, I suppose, the additional problem of perspective. Tal's first loss as champion was to a man call Florencio Camponanes, who at the time, may have been thought as just 'some local player'."
Joe used to play for Wimbledon. Campo was about 2200 - 2300 I think?
Joe used to play for Wimbledon. Campo was about 2200 - 2300 I think?
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Yes but how well-known at the time is another matter. Judging on the way Tal played, he didn't take him very seriously.
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Chess history trivia
Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:01 pmFlorencio Camponanes, who at the time, may have been thought as just 'some local player'
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5243
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Chess history trivia
Um, what is the above claim about Tal based on?
He did indeed play Campomanes at the 1960 Olympiad soon after becoming WC - and totally squashed him.
(of course, he did lose *a* game at that event......)
He did indeed play Campomanes at the 1960 Olympiad soon after becoming WC - and totally squashed him.
(of course, he did lose *a* game at that event......)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Yes, I am getting mixed up, he was his first opponent as world champion not first loss.
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Yes unfortunately so. Take for example Maurice Fox who played for Middlesex around board 3 but was Canada originally I believe. I remember Richard James telling me was pretty good, as far as its known, he's the only the player to have beaten both Capablanca and Fischer. So he could obviously play a bit.IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:48 pmThat is... a very difficult question to answer for a number of reasons. (For example, "untitled player" is not well-defined before 1950.)MJMcCready wrote: ↑Thu Mar 12, 2020 9:43 pmI'm only throwing it in because I don't know the answer, but excluding simuls, who was the first amateur player or untitled player if you like, or someone unknown to beat the official world champion of the day?
-
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:21 am
Re: Chess history trivia
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1004796MJMcCready wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:13 pmTake for example Maurice Fox who played for Middlesex around board 3 but was Canada originally I believe. as far as its known, he's the only the player to have beaten both Capablanca and Fischer.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1041139
-
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Interesting, I thought it was only M.Fox who did that.
-
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Chess history trivia
Kevin Thurlow wrote: ↑
Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:01 pm
Florencio Camponanes, who at the time, may have been thought as just 'some local player'
Oh no I didn't.
Sun Mar 15, 2020 2:01 pm
Florencio Camponanes, who at the time, may have been thought as just 'some local player'
Oh no I didn't.