Stigler's Law of Eponymy states that no scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer.
Does chess provide any examples? e.g. openings not named after their inventor.
Stigler's Law of Eponymy
-
John Foley
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:58 am
- Location: Kingston-upon-Thames
- Contact:
-
Jon D'Souza-Eva
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 7:53 am
Re: Stigler's Law of Eponymy
I think I read that Alekhine only played Alekhine's Defence a couple of times, and certainly wasn't the first do play it.
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6354
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Stigler's Law of Eponymy
That is likely true of many if not most chess openings, however.Jon D'Souza-Eva wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 7:40 pmI think I read that Alekhine only played Alekhine's Defence a couple of times, and certainly wasn't the first to play it.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 5172
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: Stigler's Law of Eponymy
There are no instances in my Chessbase databases of Philidor playing Philidor's Defence (although this is because none of the listed games have an opponent playing 2.Nf3) or Petroff playing Petroff's Defence (although he is on record as having played against it).
-
David Gilbert
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:03 am
Re: Stigler's Law of Eponymy
Susan only indicated to Tartakower that he play 1.b4. There is no record that she or any of her species ever played the move themselves, is there?
-
Tim Spanton
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:35 am
- Contact:
Re: Stigler's Law of Eponymy
I'm not sure it really matters - the move goes back to at least 1868, which is before both Tartakower and his possible inspiration were born!David Gilbert wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:25 amSusan only indicated to Tartakower that he play 1.b4. There is no record that she or any of her species ever played the move themselves, is there?