YouTube Chess Instruction

Use this section to advertise yourself or your products.
Geoff Chandler
Posts: 3496
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Under Cover

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Geoff Chandler » Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:37 am

These Championship games are indeed excellent.

You are on a good run so don't want to spoil it but I too
would love to see you get your teeth into a junior game.

Perhaps when it's all done and dusted.

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:11 pm

Rd 7 Nigel Short v Gawain Jones



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ksMhWmmzsg


As far as the junior game goes, I will try to cover the ' Littlewood' prize game winner, judged by Paul Littlewood, at the end of the event.

Colin Patterson
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:27 am

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Colin Patterson » Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:43 pm

Great job on Jones-Bates. Weak square complexes, disruptive tactics, over-adventurous play while underdeveloped, Larsen's Reversed Dutch legacy, the latent strength of the e5 advance etc. etc. - so many themes expertly covered. Most commentators would take a week or more to prepare something of that quality. Much appreciated Andrew.

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:20 am

Rd 8 Game of the Day: Buckley vs Wells

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnNiY79x4Es

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:23 am

RD 9 GOTD David Howell vs Simon Ansell



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2voi82MKjc

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:22 am


Paul Douglass
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:47 am

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Paul Douglass » Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:46 am

Hello Andrew,

Many thanks for your analysis in the commentary room and the games of the day, which have been very instructive on the whole.

However, did you consider the marathon game between J Hawkins v D Howell last night? Wouldn't that game be instructive for not giving up/chess stamina/converting a win (Hawkins not Howell). It seems that most of the game of the day during this year have involved the same sort of players, whilst I find enjoyable, musing over someone else would provide a different perspective for us patzers!

Cheers,
Paul
Paul Douglass

"Every time I win a tournament I have to think that there is something wrong with modern chess." - Victor Korchnoi

AustinElliott
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: North of England

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by AustinElliott » Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:35 pm

Perhaps that one could be video-annotated as game of the tournament??! Whatever the quality. would certainly qualify as a titanic / see-saw struggle. And if it was the game that got Hawkins a GM norm...

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:02 am

I do have some sympathy for what Paul and Austin have requested. The problem is that You Tube imposes a 15 minute limit on the videos, which means that I am limited as to the type of game to choose. Throughout the event I've found myself rushing to complete a 30 move game, let alone a marathon of 100 moves plus! I would have liked to have covered all of Hawkins-Short, Hawkins-Howell and Jones-Pert, but splitting it up into 3/4 segments is a bit too much.

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:02 am

GOTD Rd 11 Rendle vs Gormally

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OBVsFRcJ2I

Paul Douglass
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:47 am

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Paul Douglass » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:12 pm

andrew martin wrote:I do have some sympathy for what Paul and Austin have requested. The problem is that You Tube imposes a 15 minute limit on the videos, which means that I am limited as to the type of game to choose. Throughout the event I've found myself rushing to complete a 30 move game, let alone a marathon of 100 moves plus! I would have liked to have covered all of Hawkins-Short, Hawkins-Howell and Jones-Pert, but splitting it up into 3/4 segments is a bit too much.
Thanks for coming back Andrew. I do appreciate the lengths you go to, to get the games out and there are restrictions around your time.
Paul Douglass

"Every time I win a tournament I have to think that there is something wrong with modern chess." - Victor Korchnoi

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:12 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF_gUFmH ... ideo_title

Playoff Sheffield 2011 Adams v Short Game Two

andrew martin

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by andrew martin » Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:00 pm

Best Game GBCh 2011 : Hawkins v Short from Rd 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9blCVkUko8o

Tryfon Gavriel
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 2:02 pm

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Tryfon Gavriel » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:38 am

My last two radio shows cover Adams and Short from the British Championship:

Nigel Short recent wins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aSJpZoMhFU

Michael Adams recent wins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fedKilWFjJY

Best wishes
Tryfon
Webmaster, http://www.chessworld.net/chessclubs/as ... ?from=1053
Youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/kingscrusher
Host of Kingscrusher's weekly radio show on Playchess.com : "Kingscrusher's radio show"

Dashiell Shaw
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:06 pm

Re: You Tube Chess Instruction

Post by Dashiell Shaw » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:05 pm

Hi Andrew,
Very good videos, some very quirky openings which are tempting to play.
I was watching the 'Not for scholars video' and was particularly impressed as it seemed a original and dangerous way for white to approach the bishops opening.
So i put the variation into fritz but it seems to offer some more possiblities for black.

1. e4 e5
2.Bc4 Nf6
3.Qf3 Nc6
4.Ne2 Bc5
5.d3 (as played in the example game)
..d5 seems to refute the variation
6.exd5 Bg4
7.Qg3 Nb4 and black is better.

Other options are hard to find for white.

e.g. if
5. 0-0 0-0
6.d3 still.. d5

or
5. 0-0 0-0
6. c3 na5

or
5.0-0 0-0
6.h3 d5
7. exd5 e4

So it looks as if white has to settle for
5.0-0 0-0
6. Nbc3 Na5
7. Bb3 c6
8. d3 d5

Where black looks to have equalised.

Does this refute 3.Qf3?