I'd suggest that the sentence above would be more correctly terminated with a question mark.Sabrina Chevannes wrote:
Not sure you should be promoting using illegal moves to teach children though.
See http://www.whitesmoke.com/question-mark-usage
I'd suggest that the sentence above would be more correctly terminated with a question mark.Sabrina Chevannes wrote:
Not sure you should be promoting using illegal moves to teach children though.
Hmmm. I wouldn't use one there.John Upham wrote:I'd suggest that the sentence above would be more correctly terminated with a question mark.Sabrina Chevannes wrote:
Not sure you should be promoting using illegal moves to teach children though.
See http://www.whitesmoke.com/question-mark-usage
I'd suggest that the sentence above is not a complete sentence.John Upham wrote:I'd suggest that the sentence above would be more correctly terminated with a question mark.Sabrina Chevannes wrote:
Not sure you should be promoting using illegal moves to teach children though.
See http://www.whitesmoke.com/question-mark-usage
I saw what you did thereRichard James wrote:so a question mark would be a bad move
Are you George Galloway in disguise?Charlie Storey wrote:That is the Power of God - whom I will dedicate my 100th Open victory too - should it ever happen.
Chess players play under a handle with no name logged to it so as to try out various new ideas ready for a chess event.Charlie Storey wrote:I would also like to know who all British players are on ICC as I seem to be one of the few strong players who has their name logged to the handle!
Here is a short documentary on how to setup a succussful Junior Chess Club.
http://vimeo.com/38887073
Cheers
Charlie AKA The Sniper Chief.