FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

The very latest International round up of English news.
Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Rob Coles » Tue Jun 23, 2026 4:29 pm

https://www.fide.com/fide-and-world-che ... ed-online/

https://x.com/i/status/2069391321375318018
For the first time in the history of chess, online play can lead to an official FIDE rating.

Lausanne & London – June 23, 2026 – FIDE and World Chess today announced they have agreed to work toward the First Rating Experiment – a first-of-its-kind program that would let players earn their first official over-the-board FIDE blitz and rapid rating through online play. Today, around 500,000 players hold an official FIDE OTB rating. This program is designed to open that to millions more. For players who have never had access to rated over-the-board chess, it could lead to a professional chess career.

“This is how FIDE grows the game responsibly,” said FIDE President Arkady Dvorkovich. “Transparent, controlled, and built with the community. We’ve agreed on a framework that puts the integrity of the rating system first – and opens it to players who have never had a way in.”

“A FIDE rating opens doors to a professional chess career for those who want it. Some players who want one have never had a way in. This program is designed to change that,” said Ilya Merenzon, CEO of World Chess. “We’ve agreed on the framework. Now we’re doing the work properly – with FIDE, and with the chess community.”

The two parties have agreed in principle and are now working toward a final agreement. Today’s announcement invites the chess community to engage with and shape the program before anything is finalized. The program, if confirmed, would run for two years – with the possibility of extension – on worldchess.com, the official FIDE online platform, in rapid and blitz, under full FIDE supervision.

How it works

To qualify for rating conversion, a player would need to build a real body of online rated play – including a minimum number of games in online rated tournaments, not just casual games. Once eligible, their results go through fair-play checks. If those pass, a rating is issued using a carefully designed coefficient.

That coefficient is the technical heart of the program. It is calculated to ensure that a rating earned online reflects the same standard of play as one earned over the board – that an online result and an OTB result at the same level mean the same thing. The coefficient is set by specialists, recalibrated every six months against large player cohorts, and approved by FIDE.

The rating has a fixed ceiling, currently proposed at 1,800. Above it, ratings are earned over the board, as always. Players will be able to convert their rating to OTB once a calendar year, subject to community and professional input.

Fair play

Every qualifying game is screened by layered detection built for this program. Results in doubt are held and reviewed by a dedicated Anti-Cheating Officer, with a formal appeals process available to any player. The system has been independently reviewed by external experts and will undergo further certification. Every player verifies their identity before qualifying.

Community review

The technical design – the coefficient methodology, the qualifying standard, the rating ceiling, the appeals route – is open for review and discussion before anything is finalised. This is a genuine conversation, not a formality. Players, coaches, federations, and experts are invited to engage with the detail, raise concerns, and help shape the final rules.

FIDE and World Chess aim to finalize and launch the program in July, subject to further community discussion and professional input.

We invite the chess community to submit feedback on the community page, https://worldchess.com/convert-online-rating-to-otb.
One wonders where to start really - given it isn't April 1st. But in general I'm left wondering, given that World Chess Online was already the Official FIDE online chess platform, in what sense wasn't this already an official FIDE rating? It just wasn't an OTB rating, because OTB and Online are different forms of the game.

So this is doing a disservice to people who are good at online chess, their games are already rated and it's a skill in and of itself, and undermining OTB rating at the same time.

The ECF must not be left behind! I presume that my lichess ultrabullet games will soon count towards standard rating, up to a limit of 2150 of course, and with k factor 40. I'm only concerned that this might not come into play in time to qualify for this year's British...

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22610
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Jun 23, 2026 4:35 pm

Rob Coles wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2026 4:29 pm
One wonders where to start really - given it isn't April 1st. But in general I'm left wondering, given that World Chess Online was already the Official FIDE online chess platform, in what sense wasn't this already an official FIDE rating? It just wasn't an OTB rating, because OTB and Online are different forms of the game.
For that matter they were already awarding titles, those ones beginning with A which pop up on chess-results alongside GM and IM etc.

I'm not sure how much smaller "World Chess" is than chess.com, lichess etc. One hundredth the size or smaller would be my guess.

Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Rob Coles » Tue Jun 23, 2026 5:23 pm

In and of itself, titles and ranks in online play seem quite reasonable to me. But of course there is the money-grab element, and the general consensus among the players I've spoken to is that it would be quite embarrassing to have an Arena title listed against one's name for an OTB tournament especially if there's a reasonable chance one might be about to go 1.5/5 in a major section.
Roger de Coverly wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2026 4:35 pm
I'm not sure how much smaller "World Chess" is than chess.com, lichess etc. One hundredth the size or smaller would be my guess.
It's tiny, yes. In the recent press release it's claimed to have "over one million registered users".

Chesscom claims 267M "players" (registrations) and gives "global stats" for its main time controls: Daily (correspondence) 12.5M, Rapid 71.6M, Blitz 29.2M, Bullet 18.6M (checked in the last 15 minutes). I can't see on my phone what level of recency if any is required to qualify. **edit** Minimum 1 game last 90 days, account minimum 7 days old, and 20 games in the format

Lichess has a weekly rating stats available to view that claims 466k weekly rapid players, 665k weekly blitz players, 342k weekly bullet players.
Last edited by Rob Coles on Tue Jun 23, 2026 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10487
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Jun 23, 2026 5:50 pm

Rob Coles wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2026 5:23 pm
Chesscom claims 267M "players" (registrations)
Although those are two different things
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Rob Coles » Tue Jun 23, 2026 6:52 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2026 5:50 pm
Rob Coles wrote:
Tue Jun 23, 2026 5:23 pm
Chesscom claims 267M "players" (registrations)
Although those are two different things
Well yes hence the quote marks and it's also clear from the numbers. At least half of the claimed "players" have not played a game on the platform in the period chesscom considers recent, and I wouldn't be surprised if for e.g. 10-20% of newly registered users never play a game or 30-40% do not get beyond 5-10 games.

But I quoted the figures by means of comparison to the number of "players" World Chess Online has whether or not they're direct equivalents.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10487
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Jun 23, 2026 7:20 pm

Oh for sure, it was Chessdotcom rather than anything you wrote that I was taking issue with. (I'd also want to know whether all these registrations were independent of one another, i.e. represent different individuals, and so on.)

As far as World Chess is concerned, their CEO is a massive fibber.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Rob Coles » Tue Jun 23, 2026 7:35 pm

Fair enough - both chesscom and World Chess give me the creeps, both have a similar approach to publicity and facing out to market. I'm one of the users on World Chess who registered one day some years ago and haven't returned since.

The chesscom leaderboards FWIW are based on minimum 1 game last 90 days, account minimum 7 days old, and 20 games in the format. Editing previous post.

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9311
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Alex Holowczak » Wed Jun 24, 2026 9:18 am

This raises interesting questions in my mind:
1. As a tournament organiser, should I continue to use FIDE Rapid and FIDE Blitz ratings for my tournaments? Do I trust the processes in the lower end of the rating system? I already answered this question "no" with the 1000 -> 1400 changes, when the parity (or perhaps, the linear relationship) between the ECF and FIDE ratings was lost.
2. As a tournament organiser, should I submit my tournaments for FIDE Rapid and FIDE Blitz rating, if these lists are no longer solely for OTB chess? In lieu of my answer to 1, I was already debating this, but it was harmless until now. Does this experiment change anything?
3. As a national federation, should we continue to support the FIDE Rapid and FIDE Blitz ratings now that they might contain online results?

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22610
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Roger de Coverly » Wed Jun 24, 2026 11:22 am

Alex Holowczak wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 9:18 am
1. As a tournament organiser, should I continue to use FIDE Rapid and FIDE Blitz ratings for my tournaments? Do I trust the processes in the lower end of the rating system? I already answered this question "no" with the 1000 -> 1400 changes, when the parity (or perhaps, the linear relationship) between the ECF and FIDE ratings was lost.
If it was chess.com or lichess proposing to port their ratings across to the official FIDE list, you would have a point. Given how relatively few games are played on the FIDE platform is it likely to have any effect? It's also a narrow band being proposed. If the current minimum for a FIDE rating of 1400 continues and the maximum is 1800 that's a restricted subset.

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9311
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Alex Holowczak » Wed Jun 24, 2026 11:49 am

Roger de Coverly wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 11:22 am
Alex Holowczak wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 9:18 am
1. As a tournament organiser, should I continue to use FIDE Rapid and FIDE Blitz ratings for my tournaments? Do I trust the processes in the lower end of the rating system? I already answered this question "no" with the 1000 -> 1400 changes, when the parity (or perhaps, the linear relationship) between the ECF and FIDE ratings was lost.
If it was chess.com or lichess proposing to port their ratings across to the official FIDE list, you would have a point. Given how relatively few games are played on the FIDE platform is it likely to have any effect? It's also a narrow band being proposed. If the current minimum for a FIDE rating of 1400 continues and the maximum is 1800 that's a restricted subset.
Because it's an "experiment". Fast Classical was a "trial". Whatever euphemism FIDE may use, it will follow the same path - a stepping stone towards applying it more liberally; perhaps to Classical, perhaps higher up the rating list.

I am sure the proposal is mutually beneficial for both FIDE and World Chess:
- FIDE can tell the world it has extended its footprint
- World Chess can make more money by selling memberships to play in FIDE OTB rated events

Chess.com and Lichess, with all their resources and manpower, still get complaints about inadequate cheating provisions. Do we think World Chess, with significantly fewer resources, will be much better? Are we happy for FIDE ratings, even between 1400 - 1800, to have these accusations levied against them?

Phrased differently, if we introduced this for ECF ratings at the lower level, how would you feel? How would existing club level players between those ratings feel?

Brian Beattie
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:02 pm

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Brian Beattie » Wed Jun 24, 2026 1:47 pm

Alex Holowczak wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 11:49 am
..Phrased differently, if we introduced this for ECF ratings at the lower level, how would you feel? How would existing club level players between those ratings feel?...
Well, sub 1800 FIDE and maybe sub 1700 ECF a player's Lichess rating is the most accurate representation I have found for a players rapid and blitz ability I would expect to see OTB. And, quite frankly, is often a more reliable indicator of their Classical ability as well. So, I can see some merit to it. And it could help FIDE with some of their deflations issues (if adapted for classical). Whether it is practical for a FIDE online chess site, for OTB tournament organisers, compatible with the existing cheat detection, etc. is an entirely different matter.

Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Rob Coles » Wed Jun 24, 2026 2:38 pm

Personally, I don't think there'd be any issue at all with an "Official" online-to-OTB rating conversion chart, prominently featuring World Chess if you like, for use by organisers to determine tournament ratings only for new and unrated players. I don't think the output of this would need to reflect in any subsequent lists and it might even help avoid some of the off-putting mismatched pairings and ego bruising that new players encounter.

In a lot of the online discussion, the "inclusion" element of this proposal has been played up, with online players saying they simply don't have an opportunity to earn fide rating based on location/affluence/other. Its not obvious to me that they will have any use for an OTB rating if they get one. There's obviously a feeling that a (*OTB*) FIDE rating is the only legitimate form and they are currently being looked down on, therefore their online skills should be converted to get them on the ladder (there also seems to be a suggestion that at the 1800 level this will lead to further OTB opportunities and I'm finding this hard to imagine).

And I really think the mixing of online and OTB in the pool is bad not just because they are different (and therefore the rating list is made less accurate) but also it does a disservice to online chess because if players work on improving their online rating then that's where the value is already.

Then further to that it's exactly as Alex says in terms of whether I trust FIDE's approach to pilot schemes and experiments... besides which it occurs to me that 1800 OTB rapid is quite a high level (by general population standards) to conduct this kind of experiment.

Brian Beattie
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2024 2:02 pm

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Brian Beattie » Wed Jun 24, 2026 3:44 pm

Rob Coles wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 2:38 pm
...In a lot of the online discussion, the "inclusion" element of this proposal has been played up, with online players saying they simply don't have an opportunity to earn fide rating based on location/affluence/other. Its not obvious to me that they will have any use for an OTB rating if they get one. There's obviously a feeling that a (*OTB*) FIDE rating is the only legitimate form and they are currently being looked down on, therefore their online skills should be converted to get them on the ladder (there also seems to be a suggestion that at the 1800 level this will lead to further OTB opportunities and I'm finding this hard to imagine)...
Oh, there is definitely a market for those who would like this. One could make an argument that they're in the minority but just very vocal. But, I don't know whether that would be true or not. Certainly, sub 1800 FIDE, I imagine there is decent demand.
Rob Coles wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 2:38 pm
...And I really think the mixing of online and OTB in the pool is bad not just because they are different (and therefore the rating list is made less accurate)...
I'd argue that if they were using 10+5 for rapid that the rating lists would be more accurate and that online ratings would be more reflective of relative OTB performance than FIDE ratings sub 1800. Especially now since FIDE changed the rating floor. Probably, similar for blitz if 3+2
Rob Coles wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 2:38 pm
...but also it does a disservice to online chess because if players work on improving their online rating then that's where the value is already...
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive.
Rob Coles wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 2:38 pm
... besides which it occurs to me that 1800 OTB rapid is quite a high level (by general population standards) to conduct this kind of experiment...
For FIDE as things currently are 1800 is probably fine. For the ECF I could see the potential for it being viable up to at least 1650.

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9311
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by Alex Holowczak » Wed Jun 24, 2026 5:39 pm

Brian Beattie wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 1:47 pm
Alex Holowczak wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 11:49 am
..Phrased differently, if we introduced this for ECF ratings at the lower level, how would you feel? How would existing club level players between those ratings feel?...
Well, sub 1800 FIDE and maybe sub 1700 ECF a player's Lichess rating is the most accurate representation I have found for a players rapid and blitz ability I would expect to see OTB. And, quite frankly, is often a more reliable indicator of their Classical ability as well. So, I can see some merit to it. And it could help FIDE with some of their deflations issues (if adapted for classical). Whether it is practical for a FIDE online chess site, for OTB tournament organisers, compatible with the existing cheat detection, etc. is an entirely different matter.
I use a Chess.com or Lichess rating too when I have nothing else to base someone's level off. On one occasion, when they provided me with their Chess.com account, I immediately reported them for cheating based off their 1900 rating, and they were banned. I still made them play in the U2000 based on that rating rather than the U1500 section. 😀

FIDE doesn't have deflation issues. It has lighthouse issues. A 1700 rated player in England and a 1700 rated player in Sri Lanka are not the same level.

NickFaulks
Posts: 9256
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: FIDE to test "First Over-the-Board Official Rating, Earned Online"

Post by NickFaulks » Wed Jun 24, 2026 6:28 pm

Alex Holowczak wrote:
Wed Jun 24, 2026 5:39 pm
FIDE doesn't have deflation issues.
Wash your mouse out, Alex. Rating deflation is a compulsory religious belief in these parts.

In much the same way, 15 years ago, rating inflation was a compulsory religious belief.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.

Post Reply