Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

The very latest International round up of English news.
LawrenceCooper
Posts: 8673
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by LawrenceCooper » Fri Jul 03, 2026 4:19 pm

FIDE Ethics & Disciplinary Commission issues a decision in case involving GM Vladimir Kramnik
https://www.fide.com/fide-ethics-discip ... r-kramnik/

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by MJMcCready » Fri Jul 03, 2026 7:26 pm

I cant see him losing much sleep over that.

User avatar
Christopher Kreuzer
Posts: 10810
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
Location: London

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Christopher Kreuzer » Fri Jul 03, 2026 7:43 pm

For the record:
Having considered both aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the EDC imposed a two-year worldwide ban from participating in FIDE chess competitions or acting in official chess functions. The final 12 months of the ban have been suspended for a probationary period of three years, meaning the active suspension is one year provided no further breaches occur during probation. In addition, the Chamber imposed 12 months of unpaid service for the benefit of the chess community as a supplementary sanction.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by MJMcCready » Fri Jul 03, 2026 8:15 pm

Perhaps in time he will modify his behaviour but I am not so sure.

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 8673
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by LawrenceCooper » Fri Jul 03, 2026 9:15 pm

He's spent most of today tweeting about "the number of gross violations of major articles of the FIDE Regulations committed by the Ethics Commission in this case runs into the dozens" "unlawful act" "unhinged and blatant violation of any procedure of this kind." and his intention to "pursue all necessary instances to the very end in order to restore justice and, in particular, my reputation."

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6338
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Fri Jul 03, 2026 10:20 pm

A totally unsurprising reaction tbh.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by MJMcCready » Fri Jul 03, 2026 10:30 pm

Protesting his innocence?

Nick Ivell
Posts: 1470
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Nick Ivell » Mon Jul 06, 2026 10:51 am

Big article on this in the Telegraph today.

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 22611
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Jul 06, 2026 11:02 am

Nick Ivell wrote:
Mon Jul 06, 2026 10:51 am
Big article on this in the Telegraph today.
The Telegraph is behind a paywall, but this appears to be the material.
https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/iri ... 1017076756
Mr Kram­nik based his cheat­ing claims against Mr Nar­od­it­sky and other play­ers from the emer­ging gen­er­a­tion on a con­tro­ver­sial stat­ist­ical method he had developed.

He claimed that cer­tain play­ers were using com­puters stra­tegic­ally to win games without trig­ger­ing the sus­pi­cions of chess author­it­ies.
Whilst some leading chess players are or have been leading experts in mathematics and statistics, is it known what level of expertise Kramnik has in those fields?

Mick Norris
Posts: 11372
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Mick Norris » Tue Jul 07, 2026 3:23 pm

I assume this means that Uzbekistan are looking for a new men's captain for the Olympiad

Niemann has been working with Kramnik, interesting pairing of controversial characters
Any postings on here represent my personal views

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 6338
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Tue Jul 07, 2026 4:02 pm

Kramnik clearly doesn't think Niemann is a cheat, then.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

Kevin Thurlow
Posts: 6635
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Kevin Thurlow » Tue Jul 07, 2026 7:25 pm

"Kramnik clearly doesn't think Niemann is a cheat, then."

And Carlsen thought Kramnik's accusations against Naroditsky were outrageous...

Am I the only one to see "FIDE Ethics" and wonder if they are anything like "FIFA ethics"?

Rob Coles
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:36 am

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Rob Coles » Tue Jul 07, 2026 8:21 pm

Roger de Coverly wrote:
Mon Jul 06, 2026 11:02 am
Whilst some leading chess players are or have been leading experts in mathematics and statistics, is it known what level of expertise Kramnik has in those fields?
I think we can safely assume none. He's been at this topic since late 2023 and he has yet to express himself remotely coherently. At this point the onus would be on him to demonstrate, well, anything really.

His behaviour was really despicable, I'm glad to see some sanctions, but it's also quite sad and a lot of people have exploited his going off the rails along the way.

User avatar
MJMcCready
Posts: 4395
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by MJMcCready » Tue Jul 07, 2026 9:39 pm

I noticed a few times in his streams he was superfast in describing moves that looked suspicious.

User avatar
Paolo Casaschi
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 am

Re: Vladimir Kramnik FIDE Ethics Case

Post by Paolo Casaschi » Wed Jul 08, 2026 11:26 am

LawrenceCooper wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2026 4:19 pm
FIDE Ethics & Disciplinary Commission issues a decision in case involving GM Vladimir Kramnik
https://www.fide.com/fide-ethics-discip ... r-kramnik/
Without going into the details of the case, I'm wondering if I'm the only one really surprised by the following paragraph of the FIDE decision:
FIDE wrote:In addition, the Chamber imposed 12 months of unpaid service for the benefit of the chess community as a supplementary sanction.
FIDE requesting 12 months of unpaid service looks generally weird. Requesting this from a former world champion is completely ridiculous; even disagreeing with Kramnik's anti-cheating crusade, there's no doubt that over his career Kramnik has contributed more to the benefit of the chess community than the whole of the FIDE bureaucrats combined.

Is there any precedent for a chess organization, or for any sport organization, to add "unpaid community service" to a sanction against a member?

Post Reply