2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
The chess24 computer is giving Giri-Caruana as +1.29. That said, its preferred line leads to a pawn ending that is patently lost for Black.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11371
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Anand beats Aronian to join Karjakin on +2
Aronian slips back to +1, which is where I assume Caruana will be
Giri heading for draw number 9
Aronian slips back to +1, which is where I assume Caruana will be
Giri heading for draw number 9
Any postings on here represent my personal views
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6329
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
So, has Aronian choked?
Maybe it is unfortunate for Vishy (or fortunate, for those of us who don't want Anand-Carlsen III) that Karjakin seems to be made of sterner stuff.
Maybe it is unfortunate for Vishy (or fortunate, for those of us who don't want Anand-Carlsen III) that Karjakin seems to be made of sterner stuff.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
- Michael Farthing
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
- Location: Morecambe, Europe
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
And Giri concedes the draw..
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Very big deal, I think: a win would have put Giri right in there and for that matter, Caruana possibly out of it.
Last edited by JustinHorton on Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 6329
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Yes, and getting a draw out of that may well feel like a win for Fab......
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
Caruana is White against Anand next round.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
-
Mick Norris
- Posts: 11371
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
TWIC round 9 report
chess.com
Rest day today
Tomorrow:
Karjakin (5.5) - Giri (4.5)
Caruana (5) - Anand (5.5)
Aronian (5) - Topalov (3)
Svidler (4) - Nakamura (3.5)
chess.com
Rest day today
Tomorrow:
Karjakin (5.5) - Giri (4.5)
Caruana (5) - Anand (5.5)
Aronian (5) - Topalov (3)
Svidler (4) - Nakamura (3.5)
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I don’t know what Svidler’s recent history is regarding taking on the Berlin, but I think his game with J’adoubie is the best chance of getting a Wall today.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I seem to remember him mentioning something when commenting sometime about doing a mass of work vs the Berlin before some super tournament, getting it in the games, still not doing at all well and deciding to avoid it instead 
It has actually looked a little like in this tournament that they might have decided that there just isn't anything left worth trying in the endgame. Anand doing very nicely with these slow d3 things of course!
It has actually looked a little like in this tournament that they might have decided that there just isn't anything left worth trying in the endgame. Anand doing very nicely with these slow d3 things of course!
-
Roger de Coverly
- Posts: 22610
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
I could believe that White might find a line to guarantee an advantage, but that appears not so.MartinCarpenter wrote:It has actually looked a little like in this tournament that they might have decided that there just isn't anything left worth trying in the endgame.
In the variation 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5, 5. Bxc6 can be tried. This is with the logic that Black's pieces are misplaced by reference to the Exchange Spanish. Against that, Bologan, in his massive book on 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 reckons that .. f6 can and should be avoided in the line 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Bxc6 dxc6 5. O-O by either 5. .. Be7 or 5. .. Ne7 both of which lead to tactical sequences if White seizes the undefended e pawn.MartinCarpenter wrote: Anand doing very nicely with these slow d3 things of course!
-
Jonathan Bryant
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
In terms of results, yes. Theoretically, less so. I’m sure he doesn’t give a fig about that, mind.MartinCarpenter wrote:Anand doing very nicely with these slow d3 things of course!
As for the proper Berlin - afaik nobody’s come up with anything specific against the line that follows 9 ... Ke8, 10 h3 h5 as played in the last Carlsen-Anand match (can’t remember who was black in that one).
Anyway, it’s all going to happen tomorrow not today.
The Abysmal Depths of Chess: https://theabysmaldepthsofchess.blogspot.com
- Christopher Kreuzer
- Posts: 10803
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
If Anand does manage to win, will he set new records?
Smyslov, Spassky, Korchnoi and Karpov have all won through qualifying twice in a row (at least) to challenge for the title.
Anand has done so twice already, and has reached the final stages of no less than seven world championship cycles (including Mexico City, plus more if you include the FIDE ones). That is a stunning achievement. Even Kasparov has only reached that stage seven times (and Karpov seven) if I am counting correctly (the 1985 replay doesn't count for either of the two Ks).
If Anand wins this Candidates, From 2007 to 2016, he will have been in all the matches/tournaments for the World Chess Championships for 10 years (though Kasparov did this for 15 years, there was a five-year gap between 1995 and 2000).
Of course, now I've said this, he likely won't win. But it would be so impressive if he did.
Smyslov, Spassky, Korchnoi and Karpov have all won through qualifying twice in a row (at least) to challenge for the title.
Anand has done so twice already, and has reached the final stages of no less than seven world championship cycles (including Mexico City, plus more if you include the FIDE ones). That is a stunning achievement. Even Kasparov has only reached that stage seven times (and Karpov seven) if I am counting correctly (the 1985 replay doesn't count for either of the two Ks).
If Anand wins this Candidates, From 2007 to 2016, he will have been in all the matches/tournaments for the World Chess Championships for 10 years (though Kasparov did this for 15 years, there was a five-year gap between 1995 and 2000).
Of course, now I've said this, he likely won't win. But it would be so impressive if he did.
-
MartinCarpenter
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
If you count the post war tournament then seemingly Botvinnik did it for around 15 years straight, although obviously no qualifiers inbetween! 7 matches and the tournament.
- JustinHorton
- Posts: 10483
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: 2016 Candidates Moscow 10-29 March
The super GMs still to discover that 4...d6 is the moveMartinCarpenter wrote:Anand doing very nicely with these slow d3 things of course!
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."