Wijk aan Zee 2021
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Catalan in the big game today.
I was otherwise engaged yesterday but Caruana's game is being talked about a lot.
I was otherwise engaged yesterday but Caruana's game is being talked about a lot.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
There's analysis of yesterday's Caruana game in Pete Doggers report which includes a link to Ivan Sokolov's tweet
If this decision is good for Black, I need to learn chess again.
Geller is probably turning in his grave...
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Sixteen moves in and MVL looks busted against heretofore winless Donchenko
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5250
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Not having a great time of it here, is he?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Which as Karjakin said yesterday, has previously been a good sign for the Candidates, bizarrely
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
I think people have played well at Wijk, but scored badly then played well at the candidates and scored well. MVL was just being out-prepared in the early rounds at Wijk, but now he is just playing badly (it is all relative of course )
-
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
"now he is just playing badly (it is all relative of course )"
I'd settle for playing like a bad MVL!
I'd settle for playing like a bad MVL!
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
A draw in the top game. Generally this round is turning out a little less interesting than seemed likely early on.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 5250
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Actually quite an interesting final position in the battle of the "big two".
(Caruana two pawns to the good, but totally tied up and unable to do anything)
(Caruana two pawns to the good, but totally tied up and unable to do anything)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Poor Antón's López has had another bad day at the office, though this time he was rather better early on. Tari, who had an extra doubled pawn and maybe some pressure, settles for a draw against Harikrishna. Similarly Grandelius against Firouzja.
However Donchenko, who as we recall was probably winning in the early middlegame, has thrown away a draw against MVL when he seemed to have it in his hand.
As I write Wojtaszek has spent about twenty minutes considering move 44, more than half his remaining time.
All a little more interesting, after all, than I thought it might be an hour and a half ago!
However Donchenko, who as we recall was probably winning in the early middlegame, has thrown away a draw against MVL when he seemed to have it in his hand.
As I write Wojtaszek has spent about twenty minutes considering move 44, more than half his remaining time.
All a little more interesting, after all, than I thought it might be an hour and a half ago!
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Giri wins and takes the sole lead. MVL wins and leaves Donchenko in sole last place.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 10382
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Possibly long think wrong think, as he lost not very long afterwardsJustinHorton wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 6:00 pmAs I write Wojtaszek has spent about twenty minutes considering move 44, more than half his remaining time.
7 - Giri
6.5 - Caruana, Esipenko, Firouzja
6 - Van Foreest
5.5 - Carlsen
Rest day tomorrow, then
Carlsen - Giri
Firouzja - Caruana
Tari - Esipenko
Van Foreest - Harikrishna
Last edited by Mick Norris on Wed Jan 27, 2021 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 10364
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
- Location: Somewhere you're not
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Carlsen has White against Giri in the next round, I notice.
Giri's final move is very nice, I think.
Giri's final move is very nice, I think.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."
lostontime.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:34 am
- Location: London
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
During a temporary (but maybe ongoing) internet outage, I analysed a bit of the Caruana-Carlsen game from round 10.
Caruana, Fabiano (USA) - Carlsen, Magnus (NOR)
Tata Steel Masters 2021 round 10
½-½
The above is the position after 35...a3.
Going back a few moves, after 33.a3, Carlsen had to play 33...Rb3 and have a plan to meet 34.Rc1 and 35.Rc3. The tactics behind what Carlsen played are delightful. Carlsen gave up both his queenside pawns (starting with 34...b4) to force a perpetual based on the pin of the bishop on d3.
34...b4 stops 35.Rc3 (obviously). The tactics arise after 35.axb4 a3, when Caruana played 36.bxa3, and the perpetual becomes obvious after 36...Bf5 37. Rcd1 etc. The question is why can't Caruana (in the above position after 35...a3) play 36.Rc3? The answer is that Black would then play either 36...a2 or the immediate 36...Rxc3 37.bxc3 a2. Both win easily due to tactics.
After 36.Rc3 a2 37.Rxb3 Bxb3 wins as the pawn on a2 will queen.
After 36.Rc3 a2 37.Rc1, Black simply wins with 37...Rbxd3+ 38.Rxd3 Rxd3+ 39.Kxd3 Bf5+ 40.Kc3 Bb1 and the pawn queens. Note that in this line, the White pawn on b2 stops the White king from arriving on b2 to prevent the a2 pawn queening.
The same tactics are seen when Black just takes on c3. This line goes: 36.Rc3 Rxc3 37.bxc3 a2 38.Rd1 Rxd3+ 39.Kxd3 Bf5+ 40.Kc4 Bb1 and the pawn queens. In this line, the White pawn is now on c3, still preventing the Black king from arriving on b2 in time to stop the a2 pawn queening.
However, there is a big flaw in the above lines. So Black needs to win 'normally' by just playing 37...Bf5 and 38...Bf5 in those two lines, winning the bishop in both cases, and later the game.
Can you spot the flaw in my analysis (which I nearly failed to spot)?
Caruana, Fabiano (USA) - Carlsen, Magnus (NOR)
Tata Steel Masters 2021 round 10
½-½
The above is the position after 35...a3.
Going back a few moves, after 33.a3, Carlsen had to play 33...Rb3 and have a plan to meet 34.Rc1 and 35.Rc3. The tactics behind what Carlsen played are delightful. Carlsen gave up both his queenside pawns (starting with 34...b4) to force a perpetual based on the pin of the bishop on d3.
34...b4 stops 35.Rc3 (obviously). The tactics arise after 35.axb4 a3, when Caruana played 36.bxa3, and the perpetual becomes obvious after 36...Bf5 37. Rcd1 etc. The question is why can't Caruana (in the above position after 35...a3) play 36.Rc3? The answer is that Black would then play either 36...a2 or the immediate 36...Rxc3 37.bxc3 a2. Both win easily due to tactics.
After 36.Rc3 a2 37.Rxb3 Bxb3 wins as the pawn on a2 will queen.
After 36.Rc3 a2 37.Rc1, Black simply wins with 37...Rbxd3+ 38.Rxd3 Rxd3+ 39.Kxd3 Bf5+ 40.Kc3 Bb1 and the pawn queens. Note that in this line, the White pawn on b2 stops the White king from arriving on b2 to prevent the a2 pawn queening.
The same tactics are seen when Black just takes on c3. This line goes: 36.Rc3 Rxc3 37.bxc3 a2 38.Rd1 Rxd3+ 39.Kxd3 Bf5+ 40.Kc4 Bb1 and the pawn queens. In this line, the White pawn is now on c3, still preventing the Black king from arriving on b2 in time to stop the a2 pawn queening.
However, there is a big flaw in the above lines. So Black needs to win 'normally' by just playing 37...Bf5 and 38...Bf5 in those two lines, winning the bishop in both cases, and later the game.
Can you spot the flaw in my analysis (which I nearly failed to spot)?
-
- Posts: 3604
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:54 am
Re: Wijk aan Zee 2021
Bb1 isn't a winning plan because of checks on the back rank and Ra8
I'd be tempted not to agree a draw as Black in the end, Instead of Bg4, Black could just play Rb3 or Kg7, a lot a players might struggle with the idea of 'fighting for draw' with three extra pawns but I guess it is possible for Black to run into trouble too.
I'd be tempted not to agree a draw as Black in the end, Instead of Bg4, Black could just play Rb3 or Kg7, a lot a players might struggle with the idea of 'fighting for draw' with three extra pawns but I guess it is possible for Black to run into trouble too.