FIDE updates rating regulations to include faster time controls for major events
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2026 8:46 pm
The independent home for discussions on the English Chess scene.
https://www.ecforum.org.uk/
That would seem to imply that a weekend event with a time control of say 75 minutes with 30 second increments is now eligible to have all games rated even if players rated above 2400 are involved.1. To approve that, as a continuation of the pilot project, tournaments held in 2026 with a time control of 45’+30’’ (or longer, e.g., 60’+30’’) and preliminarily approved by the QC, will be counted for the standard rating.
2. The QC is authorised to approve such tournaments provided they are major or traditional events, are supported by a national or continental federation, comply with all FIDE regulations, and conduct no more than two playing rounds per day. Relevant requests must be submitted to the QC no later than one month before tthe start of the event.
Also of relevance to organisers:Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 13, 2026 9:48 pmKey pointsThat would seem to imply that a weekend event with a time control of say 75 minutes with 30 second increments is now eligible to have all games rated even if players rated above 2400 are involved.1. To approve that, as a continuation of the pilot project, tournaments held in 2026 with a time control of 45’+30’’ (or longer, e.g., 60’+30’’) and preliminarily approved by the QC, will be counted for the standard rating.
2. The QC is authorised to approve such tournaments provided they are major or traditional events, are supported by a national or continental federation, comply with all FIDE regulations, and conduct no more than two playing rounds per day. Relevant requests must be submitted to the QC no later than one month before tthe start of the event.
It would still seem to rule out players with ratings above 2400 being rated in such an event with a shorter increment if there are three rounds on one of the days.
Playing two rounds of 90 30 has long been possible for Norm tournaments, so it's not clear why this change would enable more Norm tournaments.
45 + 30 is 75 minutes to move 60 so is twice as fast as the traditional 30 in an hour and a quarter move rate formerly popular.
It occurred to me there was a historic reason for that move rate. Until the mid 1970s, many pubs were forced to close at 10.30 pm. Thus a 7.30 pm start coupled with a two and a half hour session gave time to make it to the pub or bar before last orders. That wouldn't have been possible with three hour sessions.
From my reading of it, a 30 second increment remains compulsory. Most leagues would want a shorter increment to reduce the opportunity for games going past even the hours of venues with flexible closing times.Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 4:07 pmOne point is that it would make many evening-league games Fide rateable, thus reducing the need for a separate national rating
I can't see what the point of this is supposed to be when more than two games a day are not allowed. Tournaments with two games a day at 90+30 are quite common, so what is to be gained by two games at 45+30, except a lot of hanging around?IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:13 amThe decision seems weird overall. Surely the way to test these sorts of things is with minor events, local weekenders and the like, and then you get feedback on how well it works with those before you extend it to title-norm events.
Rateable yes, but unlikely to be rated unless FIDE arbiters can be at every evening league venue?Tim Spanton wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 4:07 pmOne point is that it would make many evening-league games Fide rateable, thus reducing the need for a separate national rating
Gotta love the argument that it is the “fatigue” of playing 3 rounds a day that interferes with quality of play but not playing chess with no serious time to think.LawrenceCooper wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 6:50 amAlso of relevance to organisers:Roger de Coverly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 13, 2026 9:48 pmKey pointsThat would seem to imply that a weekend event with a time control of say 75 minutes with 30 second increments is now eligible to have all games rated even if players rated above 2400 are involved.1. To approve that, as a continuation of the pilot project, tournaments held in 2026 with a time control of 45’+30’’ (or longer, e.g., 60’+30’’) and preliminarily approved by the QC, will be counted for the standard rating.
2. The QC is authorised to approve such tournaments provided they are major or traditional events, are supported by a national or continental federation, comply with all FIDE regulations, and conduct no more than two playing rounds per day. Relevant requests must be submitted to the QC no later than one month before tthe start of the event.
It would still seem to rule out players with ratings above 2400 being rated in such an event with a shorter increment if there are three rounds on one of the days.
Playing two rounds of 90 30 has long been possible for Norm tournaments, so it's not clear why this change would enable more Norm tournaments.
45 + 30 is 75 minutes to move 60 so is twice as fast as the traditional 30 in an hour and a quarter move rate formerly popular.
It occurred to me there was a historic reason for that move rate. Until the mid 1970s, many pubs were forced to close at 10.30 pm. Thus a 7.30 pm start coupled with a two and a half hour session gave time to make it to the pub or bar before last orders. That wouldn't have been possible with three hour sessions.
Norm limitations: While players as well as arbiters and organisers will be able to earn norms in these events, a maximum of one such norm may count toward any single title (such as Grandmaster or International Master).
Schedule limits: To prevent fatigue and maintain quality of play, approved tournaments may run no more than two rounds per day.
Richard Bates wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 10:22 pmGotta love the argument that it is the “fatigue” of playing 3 rounds a day that interferes with quality of play but not playing chess with no serious time to think.
Well, yes... (in the absence of a "like" button).LawrenceCooper wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 10:25 pmRichard Bates wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 10:22 pmGotta love the argument that it is the “fatigue” of playing 3 rounds a day that interferes with quality of play but not playing chess with no serious time to think.![]()
Except that minor events can already play three games a day at 60+30, just that games for players rated >2400 can't be rated.IM Jack Rudd wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:13 amThe decision seems weird overall. Surely the way to test these sorts of things is with minor events, local weekenders and the like, and then you get feedback on how well it works with those before you extend it to title-norm events.
Except it's stranger than that - a 2400+ player can play, for rating points:LawrenceCooper wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 10:25 pmRichard Bates wrote: ↑Wed Jan 14, 2026 10:22 pmGotta love the argument that it is the “fatigue” of playing 3 rounds a day that interferes with quality of play but not playing chess with no serious time to think.![]()