Gashimov Memorial

The very latest International round up of English news.
User avatar
Carl Hibbard
Posts: 6028
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
Location: Evesham

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Carl Hibbard » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:46 pm

Not quite what I was looking for Colin are we plebs under 200 not allowed an opinion?

Hard work this is :roll:
Cheers
Carl Hibbard

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:50 pm

Colin S Crouch wrote:I have recently written a book on Magnus Carlsen, on everyman ....
Have you considered the possibility that expressing contempt for your target audience may not be the most effective marketing strategy?

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by JustinHorton » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:22 pm

I dunno. I personally would pay very good money for a chess book that addressed its readers in the style of Colin's post.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
Paolo Casaschi
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 am

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Paolo Casaschi » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:33 pm

JustinHorton wrote:I dunno. I personally would pay very good money for a chess book that addressed its readers in the style of Colin's post.
If you like that sort of things, the next time you are in Rome you should visit this restaurant in Trastevere: next to decent food you get waiters cursing and verbally abusing customers; not sure it's still in business though ;-)

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by JustinHorton » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:52 pm

I did go to that Soho pub with the rude landlord (Norman Balon) once. Unfortunately he wasn't in, though Barry Cryer was at the bar having another one he plainly didn't need.

I think Everyman should go with this, though. It'd be fantastic.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21312
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:36 am

Carlsen's play continues the trend seen in the Candidates of the top players using club player openings. Actually, given that it was the Cambridge Springs, it's actually a school player opening, or perhaps was, forty five years ago.

ChessBase gives some annotation http://en.chessbase.com/post/gashimov-r ... ying-start and points out the pawn sacrifice inherent in White's play. Long, long ago, I would probably have believed that White had blundered a pawn.

Having now seen the game, I'm inclined to agree with the earlier comment that with the Bishop stuck on a3, an engine evaluation of equality is difficult to accept.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10357
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Mick Norris » Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:21 am

Any postings on here represent my personal views

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5232
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:48 pm

Naka still Carlsen's bunny, it seems :)
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

User avatar
Paolo Casaschi
Posts: 1187
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 am

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Paolo Casaschi » Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:11 pm

Matt Mackenzie wrote:Naka still Carlsen's bunny, it seems :)
Considering their score in direct encounters at standard chess, it's amazing how often he's mentioned as a threat to Carlsen for the world championship.

MartinCarpenter
Posts: 3048
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 10:58 am

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by MartinCarpenter » Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:15 pm

They've not often been close either. Some horribly one sided games.

Jonathan Bryant
Posts: 3452
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 3:54 pm

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Jonathan Bryant » Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:51 pm

Was anybody watching live when Carlsen played Bd3? How long did it take him?

Ray Sayers

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Ray Sayers » Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:04 pm

Carl Hibbard wrote:Not quite what I was looking for Colin are we plebs under 200 not allowed an opinion?
No. I think that has been made pretty clear in previous posts.

I'll go hide back in patzerville now.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10357
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Mick Norris » Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:14 pm

Jonathan Bryant wrote:Was anybody watching live when Carlsen played Bd3? How long did it take him?
You can see the times for each move here
http://www.shamkirchess.az/?options=content&id=46

Carlsen took 2 m 12 sec to play 6 Be2 and 1 m 39 sec to play 7 Bd3
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21312
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Roger de Coverly » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:02 pm

Mick Norris wrote:[
Carlsen took 2 m 12 sec to play 6 Be2 and 1 m 39 sec to play 7 Bd3
It could even be a novelty. 7. Qb3 had been previously played, both by Carlsen himself and Aronian (against Carlsen !). I suppose the point is that the exchange of Bishops is more or less forced as .. Bg6 is not really available after Black commits himself to .. h6.

Angus French
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:37 am

Re: Gashimov Memorial

Post by Angus French » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:20 pm

Mick Norris wrote:
Jonathan Bryant wrote:Was anybody watching live when Carlsen played Bd3? How long did it take him?
You can see the times for each move here
http://www.shamkirchess.az/?options=content&id=46

Carlsen took 2 m 12 sec to play 6 Be2 and 1 m 39 sec to play 7 Bd3
Peter Svidler and Jan Gustafsson discussed the move on chess24. Svidler said that if bishops were exchanged and White got in e4 then ...h6 would give a target for kingside play. Gustafsson said Black often tried to prevent White's e4 by playing ...Bb4. He then, IIRC, suggested the moves that ended up being played to 11 Rfd1 and gave three alternatives for Black - 11...Bxc3 as played, 11...a5 and 11...Ba5 which I think was his preference. He pointed out that 11... Nbd7 would be a mistake due to 12 Nxd5.