Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 2015
- Matt Mackenzie
- Posts: 5205
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Millom, Cumbria
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
This discussion makes one wonder - who has come closest to achieving the GM title without actually doing so?
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
- Contact:
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
I think this depends on how you define "closest".Matt Mackenzie wrote:This discussion makes one wonder - who has come closest to achieving the GM title without actually doing so?
Jonathan Hawkins had the norms and the rating, the problem was that all of his norms were made outside of the foreigner requirement; and one of them needs to be made in accordance with the rules.
Is being out by 1 foreigner in a valid norm closer than 1 rating point out in TPR that would otherwise be a norm?
- Paolo Casaschi
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:46 am
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
If I remember correctly, FIDE used to consider (and approve) title applications with such results missed by a small margin, especially when combined with other norms exceeding the requirement or with higher than required Elo. Unless this changed, there is still hope this might be used by Kjartansson (provided his federation is up for it); still it does not help at this moment the Hastings congress to boast norm level results.David Sedgwick wrote:Alex McFarlane wrote:Gudmunder Kjartansson needs 2/2 v 2524 rated opponent in rd 9Christopher Kreuzer wrote:However, he played Mark Hebden (2523) in the final round. Does that mean that Kjartansson missed out on a GM norm by one rating point and the overall TPR (even raising the rating of the lowest-rated player) fell agonisingly short?NickFaulks wrote:It does look one rating point short to me. Pity, because he's just come off another very unlucky miss.All the above posters are correct, sadly.LawrenceCooper wrote:I believe that the average is 2379.44 but one more rating point would take the average to 2379.55 and therefore sufficient to be rounded up to 2380.
-
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
The SCCU website reports that Keith Arkell and Jonathan Hawkins share the 2014-15 SCCU title awarded at the Hastings Masters. I was aware that Jonathan had moved "south" as confirmed by the ecfgrading site which has a Hendon connection. Keith plays everywhere, but no SCCU eligibility is immediately apparent.
http://www.sccu.ndo.co.uk/new.htm
http://www.sccu.ndo.co.uk/new.htm
-
- Posts: 3417
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:17 am
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
Great pictorial report on ChessBase which includes pictures of all the leading players. One other thing I did notice was Theo Slade's remarkable gain of 113 Elo. http://en.chessbase.com/post/zhao-jun-b ... s-congress
-
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 6:31 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
The Tournament Website shows:-
GM Jonathan Hawkins ENG with a start grade of 2552, a Tournament TPR of 2549 and a (W-We) of +0.16.
So a performance less than his current rating will result in an increase to that rating. This is unusual but not completely unexpected considering the way these things are calculated.
Edit. now if a junior with k=40 had hit this anomaly ..... see next post by RdeC.
GM Jonathan Hawkins ENG with a start grade of 2552, a Tournament TPR of 2549 and a (W-We) of +0.16.
So a performance less than his current rating will result in an increase to that rating. This is unusual but not completely unexpected considering the way these things are calculated.
Edit. now if a junior with k=40 had hit this anomaly ..... see next post by RdeC.
Last edited by E Michael White on Thu Jan 08, 2015 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
That shows the positive side of the K=40 rule as it brings his FIDE rating to within 50 points of his converted August 2014 ECF. The negative side is shown by the effect on any Junior who appeared to have a poor tournament and lost around 80 points.Chris Rice wrote: One other thing I did notice was Theo Slade's remarkable gain of 113 Elo.
-
- Posts: 5249
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:56 pm
- Location: Croydon
- Contact:
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
He plays for Drunken Knights Surrey in the Border League when available. It's two or three years since he last did so, but he assured me that he remains a current member. On this basis the SCCU confirmed his eligibility.Roger de Coverly wrote:The SCCU website reports that Keith Arkell and Jonathan Hawkins share the 2014-15 SCCU title awarded at the Hastings Masters. I was aware that Jonathan had moved "south" as confirmed by the ecfgrading site which has a Hendon connection. Keith plays everywhere, but no SCCU eligibility is immediately apparent.
Whether this should be a sufficient criterion to be eligible for the SCCU Championship is in my opinion doubtful. However, the Executive Committee recently reviewed the issue and decided to retain the status quo.
-
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
"On this basis the SCCU confirmed his eligibility."
Keith likes a challenge - so here's one. How many different "Union" titles can he win in a year!?
Keith likes a challenge - so here's one. How many different "Union" titles can he win in a year!?
- IM Jack Rudd
- Posts: 4818
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:13 am
- Location: Bideford
- Contact:
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
Birth in MCCU and current residency in WECU gives him another two. In fact, I think he may now have lived in Paignton for so long that he's permanently eligible for the WECU title.
-
- Posts: 8453
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:28 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but the days when a title could be gained on the back of a near miss and a bit of political horse-trading are gone, hopefully forever.Paolo Casaschi wrote: If I remember correctly, FIDE used to consider (and approve) title applications with such results missed by a small margin, especially when combined with other norms exceeding the requirement or with higher than required Elo.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a QR code stamped on a human face — forever.
-
- Posts: 10328
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
Keith plays for Marple in the Manchester League, which makes him MCCU eligible in any eventIM Jack Rudd wrote:Birth in MCCU and current residency in WECU gives him another two. In fact, I think he may now have lived in Paignton for so long that he's permanently eligible for the WECU title.
He used to play for Heywood, which would have made him NCCU eligible
Any postings on here represent my personal views
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
Let's hear from the EACU. I don't know the qualification rules of any Union other than SCCU, but I agree with David Sedgwick in thinking the SCCU ones due for an overhaul. The big reason is that they shouldn't unquestioningly follow the ECF's County Championship rules, which Home Directors can change on a whim every year.Mick Norris wrote:...He used to play for Heywood, which would have made him NCCU eligibleIM Jack Rudd wrote:Birth in MCCU and current residency in WECU gives him another two. In fact, I think he may now have lived in Paignton for so long that he's permanently eligible for the WECU title.Kevin Thurlow wrote:How many different "Union" titles can [Keith Arkell] win in a year!?
-
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Hastings International Chess 29 Dec 2014 - 6 January 201
Perhaps ironically, twenty years ago he wouldn't have needed the help! He would (i think) have had a (category) norm anyway. What's more it would have been of more value than the (performance) norm that he just missed out on!NickFaulks wrote:I'm sorry to disappoint you, but the days when a title could be gained on the back of a near miss and a bit of political horse-trading are gone, hopefully forever.Paolo Casaschi wrote: If I remember correctly, FIDE used to consider (and approve) title applications with such results missed by a small margin, especially when combined with other norms exceeding the requirement or with higher than required Elo.