Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

The very latest International round up of English news.
AustinElliott
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: North of England

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by AustinElliott » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:01 pm

Tim Harding wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:49 pm
Caruana's clock is a big worry, what time does he really have left?
Tempted to reply 'probably more than Grischuk'...!

ADDED: Chess24 now has all players having reached move 40 without anyone losing on time...
Last edited by AustinElliott on Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1732
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Nick Burrows » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:02 pm

LawrenceCooper wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:56 pm
Tim Harding wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:49 pm
Caruana's clock is a big worry, what time does he really have left?
To answer that we would need to know at what point and what move you were refering to.
:lol: :mrgreen: 8)

Tim Harding
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Tim Harding » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:06 pm

LawrenceCooper wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:56 pm
Tim Harding wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 5:49 pm
Caruana's clock is a big worry, what time does he really have left?
To answer that we would need to know at what point and what move you were refering to.
Touche. Anyway time control made by all six players now.
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter

Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:06 pm

It's hard to see any outcome other than Caruana winning the tournament.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Tim Harding
Posts: 2323
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Tim Harding » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:12 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:06 pm
It's hard to see any outcome other than Caruana winning the tournament.
Unfortunately Vlad seems to have given Shak some hope by missing the liquidatioin tactics just before move 40, so Caruana is not yet home and dry. Kramnik should hold it though.

Ding probably has to accept he is not going to win, though the engine likes ...a3 to permanently tie down the White K. How it thinks Black could win after that is obscure.
Tim Harding
Historian and FIDE Arbiter

Author of 'Steinitz in London,' British Chess Literature to 1914', 'Joseph Henry Blackburne: A Chess Biography', and 'Eminent Victorian Chess Players'
http://www.chessmail.com

Nick Ivell
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:33 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Nick Ivell » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:13 pm

I'm assuming that Caruana wins the tournament now. He deserves to; without setting the Thames on fire, he's played the most correct chess.

What are his chances against Magnus? I would say quite reasonable.

AustinElliott
Posts: 665
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: North of England

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by AustinElliott » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:14 pm

JustinHorton wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:06 pm
It's hard to see any outcome other than Caruana winning the tournament.
Any other outcome would certainly depend on Grischuk holding on for a draw.

Karjakin seems (typically for him) to have found an impregnable drawing set up even if Ding plays ..a3, so I guess that one is heading for 0.5-0.5.
[EDIT: Yup, draw agreed after ..a3]

As Mamedyarov has N+2P for the R, I guess he can keep playing 'no risk' indefinitely, pushing the K-side pawns forward and trying to torment poor Kramnik, who has had the occasional bout of self-destruction in the tournament.

..Still, the chances definitely all seem to be with Caruana

PS Grischuk having such a long think over his 41st move that one wonders if he feels uncomfortable when NOT in time pressure, and is hence trying to get back there as soon as possible...
Last edited by AustinElliott on Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:19 pm

Draw in Karjakin - Ding
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

Roger de Coverly
Posts: 21320
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Roger de Coverly » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:21 pm

In the Ding game, they've now reached a position for the text books to give as an example of why material advantage in a bad bishop ending isn't always winning.


White to move

User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 1057
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Chris Goodall » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:33 pm

Roger de Coverly wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:21 pm
In the Ding game, they've now reached a position for the text books to give as an example of why material advantage in a bad bishop ending isn't always winning.


White to move
I don't understand why Ding played the ...d5 break just to capture on e4, because the knight is clearly much better on e4 attacking two black pawns than on either d5 or f5.
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.

Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:37 pm

It's not of any importance, but would Caruana go above 2800 again if he won this one?
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

LawrenceCooper
Posts: 7258
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:13 am

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by LawrenceCooper » Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:00 pm

Chris Wardle wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:33 pm
Roger de Coverly wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:21 pm
In the Ding game, they've now reached a position for the text books to give as an example of why material advantage in a bad bishop ending isn't always winning.


White to move
I don't understand why Ding played the ...d5 break just to capture on e4, because the knight is clearly much better on e4 attacking two black pawns than on either d5 or f5.
He didn't take on e4, Karjakin took the pawn on d5. Regarding the pawn break itself; it was about the only thing left to try before agreeing to a draw.

Nick Burrows
Posts: 1732
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:15 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Nick Burrows » Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:07 pm

Nick Faulks is crying into his "How to play The Berlin Wall" :(

User avatar
JustinHorton
Posts: 10364
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:06 am
Location: Somewhere you're not

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by JustinHorton » Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:12 pm

Kramnik-Mamedyarov drawn.
"Do you play chess?"
"Yes, but I prefer a game with a better chance of cheating."

lostontime.blogspot.com

User avatar
Chris Goodall
Posts: 1057
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm

Re: Candidates Tournament in Berlin March 2018

Post by Chris Goodall » Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:23 pm

LawrenceCooper wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:00 pm
Chris Wardle wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:33 pm
Roger de Coverly wrote:
Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:21 pm
In the Ding game, they've now reached a position for the text books to give as an example of why material advantage in a bad bishop ending isn't always winning.


White to move
I don't understand why Ding played the ...d5 break just to capture on e4, because the knight is clearly much better on e4 attacking two black pawns than on either d5 or f5.
He didn't take on e4, Karjakin took the pawn on d5. Regarding the pawn break itself; it was about the only thing left to try before agreeing to a draw.
What did he think would be the result of trying it when he tried it? Whether Black captures on e4 or White on d5, Black ends up with no more pawn breaks and a knight planted on e4. He's got to be able to follow it up with ...c4 if he needs to win, surely? If 39...c4 doesn't work, then instead of ...d5 he has to go 38...a4 39.bxa4 d5 40.Nf2 c4.
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.

Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.