The English Language

A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
Andy Stoker
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Andy Stoker » Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:56 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:08 am
My advantage looks adequate to claim the full point in this endgame.

What does it mean to 'claim' the full point?
Just means "win the game" - achieve the full point

Andy Stoker
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Andy Stoker » Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:00 am

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:09 pm
White might be able to hold on as he has no static weaknesses, either in his pawn-structure or in his piece placement.

Is he saying that piece placement is an static factor?
Apparently - but it seems like an odd thing to say ... he needs to move something, so it cannot be static ... I get the sense of a position where the pawn structure is sound and pieces are already fairly well placed for the defence

User avatar
Michael Farthing
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:28 pm
Location: Morecambe, Europe

Re: The English Language

Post by Michael Farthing » Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:59 am

The phrase says "static weaknesses" and both words surely must be taken together. A doubled pawn is a static weakness. It is a weakness that often stays to the end of the game and cannot be got rid of easily. For pieces, to take an extreme example to make the point, might be a bishop on f1 with pawns on e2 and g2 and enemy pawns on e3 and g3. The bishop is (incredibly) weak and stands little chance of ever getting free.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:02 pm

To drum up sth means to create it bit-by-bit or just with persistence?

Andy Stoker
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Andy Stoker » Sun Nov 11, 2018 3:10 am

"sth" ? - if it means "something" and you are asking about "drum up" - it means to encourage, to bring to greater activity (the idea of people responding to the beat of a drum) - in a chess sense, I suppose it could be used about - for example - drumming up a king side attack by advancing pawns, or re-activating a bishop by re-deploying it ... it has the sense of attack, I think.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:28 am

Andy Stoker wrote:
Sun Nov 11, 2018 3:10 am
"sth" ? - if it means "something" and you are asking about "drum up" - it means to encourage, to bring to greater activity (the idea of people responding to the beat of a drum) - in a chess sense, I suppose it could be used about - for example - drumming up a king side attack by advancing pawns, or re-activating a bishop by re-deploying it ... it has the sense of attack, I think.
oh thanks, so drum up initiative/activity/etc, means the same as develop initiative/activity/etc?

Andy Stoker
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Andy Stoker » Sun Nov 11, 2018 4:38 pm

Yes, I think so - more or less

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Mon Nov 12, 2018 8:44 pm

What does 'Modern Chess practice' mean?
The most important element in modern chess practice is probably correct planning.

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:41 am

16 ... tbxd4?! 17 tbxd4 i.xc4 18 1:1c l d5 19 e5 tbd7 20 i.e3 ! ;1; would leave White satisfied.
Why not 'Would make White satisfied'?

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:06 pm

What does it mean if a coontinuation is more 'accurate' (he didn't use precise or exact)?

User avatar
Matt Mackenzie
Posts: 5234
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Millom, Cumbria

Re: The English Language

Post by Matt Mackenzie » Tue Nov 13, 2018 1:18 pm

soheil_hooshdaran wrote:
Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:06 pm
What does it mean if a coontinuation is more 'accurate' (he didn't use precise or exact)?
No difference practically speaking.
"Set up your attacks so that when the fire is out, it isn't out!" (H N Pillsbury)

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Tue Nov 13, 2018 6:13 pm

Thanks.

What's a 'thrust'?

Thanks in advance

Barry Sandercock
Posts: 1356
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:52 am

Re: The English Language

Post by Barry Sandercock » Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:37 am

Probably an attacking move. Not a normal chess term.

Andy Stoker
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:23 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by Andy Stoker » Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:08 pm

I would expect a thrust to be an attacking pawn move - at least to the 5th rank

soheil_hooshdaran
Posts: 3148
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:24 pm

Re: The English Language

Post by soheil_hooshdaran » Thu Nov 15, 2018 9:34 pm

In
The two connected passed pawns will beat the isolated passed c-pawn.
'the' means 'this?