Monty Panesar

A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:54 pm

Bob Clark wrote:
Mick Norris wrote:
David Robertson wrote:BBC says "minimum 28 overs". Cricinfo tweets say "80 mins + 16 overs, making 32 overs"

Of far, far greater interest is the suggestion that Somerset have a huge incentive to b*gger up Lancs because of Lancs capitulation to Notts last year :lol:
I gather Brian Close lost the England captaincy for Somerset bowling too slowly against Warks?
Dont want to be Picky but wasnt he playing for Yorkshire at the time - he only moved to somerset later in his career
Serves me right for half listening to TMS while I was working, I assumed they were making a point about Somerset :lol:
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:09 pm

Hants 110 ahead with 5 wickets left

Lancs have reached 100 without loss

Beginning to look likely
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:30 pm

Here we go, both Lancs openers out

Horton completes the season with another half century and a top score of 99

Edit - going into the final hour, Lancs need 74 from 16 overs
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Alex Holowczak » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:37 pm

Hampshire v Warwickshire is all but drawn. Lancashire are coasting to victory...

Paul Cooksey

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Paul Cooksey » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:45 pm

Alex Holowczak wrote:Hampshire v Warwickshire is all but drawn. Lancashire are coasting to victory...
Not sure coasting is the right word for a team scoring at 9 an over. Sprinting, maybe! :D

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:47 pm

Ervine out, but McKenzie still there on 111 same score as Carberry got earlier - not quite up to their effort against Yorks, but much more important

Bates out first ball, Metters on a hat trick
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Paul McKeown
Posts: 3735
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Hayes (Middx)

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Paul McKeown » Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:56 pm

Why don't Hants. declare, forcing Warks. to decide whether to accept the draw or to attempt to berserk their way to a near impossible target, risking a loss?

Alex Holowczak
Posts: 9085
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Alex Holowczak » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:01 pm

Paul McKeown wrote:Why don't Hants. declare, forcing Warks. to decide whether to accept the draw or to attempt to berserk their way to a near impossible target, risking a loss?
Maybe they just want to go home ASAP? :P

Gemaal Hussain is doing his best to play himself out of the 40-over Final team. He's been iffy this season, was expensive in the first innings, got run out for 0 to set up this run chase, hasn't bowled so far in this innings, and just dropped a sitter.

Captains have shaken hands at the Rose Bowl; match drawn. Lancashire will win the Championship!

David Robertson

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by David Robertson » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:02 pm

...because it's easier on the collective legs to have two guys batting, and nine guys with their feet up. I bet the bowlers get a say in it :-)

Paul McKeown
Posts: 3735
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Hayes (Middx)

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Paul McKeown » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:03 pm

Perhaps the Counties Ch. scoring system could do with a tweak, bonus points for winning with a declared low target or winning with a low number of overs. Might make for some interesting final session gambles.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:04 pm

Lancs 16 runs from the title, 17 to win, 8 wickets in hand :D
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Paul McKeown
Posts: 3735
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Hayes (Middx)

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Paul McKeown » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:04 pm

That's a very cheesy grin, Mick! :D

Paul McKeown
Posts: 3735
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
Location: Hayes (Middx)

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Paul McKeown » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:05 pm

Warks. finally given up. Draw.

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:08 pm

Paul McKeown wrote:That's a very cheesy grin, Mick! :D

61 years since a shared title with Surrey, 77 years since an outright win, I didn't think it would happen this season with a smaller squad, fantastic effort from Chapple and the team
Any postings on here represent my personal views

Mick Norris
Posts: 10384
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester

Re: Monty Panesar

Post by Mick Norris » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:13 pm

5:10 pm Champions
Any postings on here represent my personal views