Serves me right for half listening to TMS while I was working, I assumed they were making a point about SomersetBob Clark wrote:Dont want to be Picky but wasnt he playing for Yorkshire at the time - he only moved to somerset later in his careerMick Norris wrote:I gather Brian Close lost the England captaincy for Somerset bowling too slowly against Warks?David Robertson wrote:BBC says "minimum 28 overs". Cricinfo tweets say "80 mins + 16 overs, making 32 overs"
Of far, far greater interest is the suggestion that Somerset have a huge incentive to b*gger up Lancs because of Lancs capitulation to Notts last year
Monty Panesar
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Hants 110 ahead with 5 wickets left
Lancs have reached 100 without loss
Beginning to look likely
Lancs have reached 100 without loss
Beginning to look likely
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Here we go, both Lancs openers out
Horton completes the season with another half century and a top score of 99
Edit - going into the final hour, Lancs need 74 from 16 overs
Horton completes the season with another half century and a top score of 99
Edit - going into the final hour, Lancs need 74 from 16 overs
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: Monty Panesar
Hampshire v Warwickshire is all but drawn. Lancashire are coasting to victory...
Re: Monty Panesar
Not sure coasting is the right word for a team scoring at 9 an over. Sprinting, maybe!Alex Holowczak wrote:Hampshire v Warwickshire is all but drawn. Lancashire are coasting to victory...
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Ervine out, but McKenzie still there on 111 same score as Carberry got earlier - not quite up to their effort against Yorks, but much more important
Bates out first ball, Metters on a hat trick
Bates out first ball, Metters on a hat trick
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Monty Panesar
Why don't Hants. declare, forcing Warks. to decide whether to accept the draw or to attempt to berserk their way to a near impossible target, risking a loss?
-
- Posts: 9085
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:18 pm
- Location: Oldbury, Worcestershire
Re: Monty Panesar
Maybe they just want to go home ASAP?Paul McKeown wrote:Why don't Hants. declare, forcing Warks. to decide whether to accept the draw or to attempt to berserk their way to a near impossible target, risking a loss?
Gemaal Hussain is doing his best to play himself out of the 40-over Final team. He's been iffy this season, was expensive in the first innings, got run out for 0 to set up this run chase, hasn't bowled so far in this innings, and just dropped a sitter.
Captains have shaken hands at the Rose Bowl; match drawn. Lancashire will win the Championship!
Re: Monty Panesar
...because it's easier on the collective legs to have two guys batting, and nine guys with their feet up. I bet the bowlers get a say in it
-
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Monty Panesar
Perhaps the Counties Ch. scoring system could do with a tweak, bonus points for winning with a declared low target or winning with a low number of overs. Might make for some interesting final session gambles.
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Lancs 16 runs from the title, 17 to win, 8 wickets in hand
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Monty Panesar
That's a very cheesy grin, Mick!
-
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: Hayes (Middx)
Re: Monty Panesar
Warks. finally given up. Draw.
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Re: Monty Panesar
Paul McKeown wrote:That's a very cheesy grin, Mick!
61 years since a shared title with Surrey, 77 years since an outright win, I didn't think it would happen this season with a smaller squad, fantastic effort from Chapple and the team
Any postings on here represent my personal views
-
- Posts: 10384
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester