Isn't it reassuring ....

A section to discuss matters not related to Chess in particular.
Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:52 am

...to see that competitors in some other games are even crazier, even more lampooned by the mainstream press, and even worse rewarded, than chess players?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 71616.html

Paul Sanders
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:36 pm

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by Paul Sanders » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:31 am

The trophy and $20,000 (£12,700) prize was claimed yesterday by New Zealander Nigel Richards, who assured his 3-2 win over Australian Andrew Fisher by taking 95 points with "omnified" – to have rendered something universal.
Worse rewarded???? 12 grand for 5 rounds!

Jonathan Rogers
Posts: 4662
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by Jonathan Rogers » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:39 am

world championship, though!

User avatar
John Upham
Posts: 7238
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Cove, Hampshire, England.

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by John Upham » Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:47 am

I can see the Sun headline now:

"Letter G put on the Spot!"

I tried my best...!

How would have Sesame Street dealt with this?
British Chess News : britishchessnews.com
Twitter: @BritishChess
Facebook: facebook.com/groups/britishchess :D

David Robertson

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by David Robertson » Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:54 pm

"This game is not about words", Mr Smitheram says without any irony. "The vast majority of the top players are mathematicians or computer programmers. This game is about the probability that a set of symbols will come together in such a way that you can play them on the board"
I was quite taken by this insightful self-reflection, obvious to some perhaps, but not commonly observed among enthusiasts of kindred activities. Mr Smitheram happily distances himself from any mystique attaching to Scrabble, and heads directly for its neurological basis.

It begs the question of whether, one day, we'll be in a position to know the neurological components of successful chess, demystifying the game (alas?) in the process. I suspect Jonathan Rowson is on the right track with his idea of fluency which, if I understand him correctly, can be applied to extraordinary performance in language, numbers, chess, and presumably much more, like music. Quite what mix of 'fluencies' is involved, and how fluency is acquired and/or developed, remains beyond us currently, I think. But neuroscience is the coming field. We'll know more, much more, in 50 years time - or someone will anyway.

Jon D'Souza-Eva

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by Jon D'Souza-Eva » Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:35 pm

A strong scrabble player I spoke to told me that a very well known British scrabble player was once banned for three years for concealing a tile up his sleeve.

David Robertson

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by David Robertson » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:19 pm

Y?

PeterTurland
Posts: 541
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Isn't it reassuring ....

Post by PeterTurland » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:18 pm

Well If I really wanted an objective comparison, I would try to teach both to a great ape, a creature like Kanzi would be a good candidate.