Right you are, but how about looking at it another way...Matt Mackenzie wrote: ↑Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:19 pmI would have thought "tiny" would normally be smaller than the other two.
Elsewhere on the forum there's been talk of 'centipawns'...
So, just for the sake of argument, could we say something like - a tiny advantage = 10 centipawns, a slight advantage = 20 and a small advantage = 30?
The evaluation of advantages in chess positions is a very fine art for humans, but a massive calculation for machines. How to reconcile the two?