The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
yes in hindsight hxg2 bxg2 works but thats not under pressure
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:55 pm
- Location: Holmfirth
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
Only with seconds left on the clock in panic mode. Black is trying it on here and some calculation should see it to a win.
HDCA President
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
But that's not true, is it Alan? As Roger points out, at the point where you "cracked" under "extreme pressure", you had an advantage of +4. I don't mean to disparage Jon Duffield, chess is hard after all, but 11...Bxg3, 13...Qe7+ and 15...h3 were all objectively rotten moves. 15...h3 isn't even threatening to win any material, it's just a cheap trap. If you pass your turn and allow him to take on g2, you can take back and f3 is covered.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 4:41 pmthis is a 1482 player playing brilliantly-under extreme pressure i crack.
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
ah yes because its check everything just holds together for white hxg2 Rxh8+ works for white then after Kd7 Bxg2
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
but if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
to the human eye seeing a games complexity it looks dangerous the whole attack
-
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:05 pm
- Location: Evesham
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
I am afraid not Alan none is this is the least bit complicated.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:17 pmbut if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
Cheers
Carl Hibbard
Carl Hibbard
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
i mean where does white castle for one, i am a stickler for trying to castle into a safe position.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:55 pm
- Location: Holmfirth
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
i want a second opinion and a third and a fourthCarl Hibbard wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:19 pmI am afraid not Alan none is this is the least bit complicated.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:17 pmbut if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
-
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2021 10:40 am
- Location: Barrow, England
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
i think you have failed the turin testAlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:27 pmi want a second opinion and a third and a fourthCarl Hibbard wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:19 pmI am afraid not Alan none is this is the least bit complicated.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:17 pmbut if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
-
- Posts: 1057
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:40 pm
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
If you see all what? Literally the only thing White has to see is that g2 is defended by the bishop on f1. You don't have to calculate anything. Rxh8+ is crushing but even if you don't see it, Bxg2 defends the h1-rook. Tell us what you think you need computer/grandmaster assistance for in this position.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:17 pmbut if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
Donate to Sabrina's fundraiser at https://gofund.me/aeae42c7 to support victims of sexual abuse in the chess world.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
Northumberland webmaster, Jesmond CC something-or-other. Views mine. Definitely below the Goodall Line.
-
- Posts: 21322
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:51 pm
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
That was all I noticed at a first glance. 1482 isn't beginner standard. Some players take a lifetime and never get that high.Chris Goodall wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:33 pmRxh8+ is crushing but even if you don't see it, Bxg2 defends the h1-rook.
-
- Posts: 3561
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:31 pm
- Location: Awbridge, Hampshire
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
After 15... h3 Black's not even winning if White could pass and Black could have another move. It's easy to see that if Black's second move in a row was 16... hxg2, White has 17.Rxh8+ Kd7 18.Bxg2 and Black has no compensation for the lost material. The obvious move for White is 16.d4, forcing the knight to move, so the pawn on h3 can be captured leaving White 3 pawns up.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:27 pmi want a second opinion and a third and a fourthCarl Hibbard wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:19 pmI am afraid not Alan none is this is the least bit complicated.AlanLlewellyn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 11, 2022 5:17 pmbut if you see all that you are either using a computer for analysis or asking a grandmaster
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:55 pm
- Location: Holmfirth
Re: The 2001 Fischer internet hoax
On the plus side, Alan now has his 5th opinion. Will that settle it?
HDCA President