Adam Raoof wrote:Would you have someone who is registered with FIDE for New Zealand represent England in an Olympiad?
No, because FIDE don't let you.
Adam Raoof wrote:If not, then why would you let them play in the British Championships?
Because they're not run by FIDE.
Adam Raoof wrote:I'm more concerned with finding ways to get more people to play in the Championships, rather than restricting entry - but you have to strike a balance. Is it right that a player changes his affiliation away from ENG and then rushes back when a good sponsor comes along?
By introducing this policy at the British, you make it far more likely that someone will keep switching nationalities.
Adam Raoof wrote:Once you have sub-rules about residency you have to police them too - not always possible as I know from working in a University with a large number of international students!
Then why does such a rule exist in the Counties Championship, which is run by the English Chess Federation? The rules for the Counties Championship explicitly allows students of any nationality to play in it. They also allow people to qualify by residence, a qualification route that a lot of players use, and no one polices.
Adam Raoof wrote:Frankly I would never have changed the rules that allowed Commonwealth players into the British...
It didn't work like that. In the old days, "British" meant the Commonwealth. As every Speedway fan knows, Ivan Mauger and Barry Briggs both won the British Final in Speedway, despite being New Zealanders. Commonwealth players were always eligible; the 2003 change was the first one to prevent them from playing.