Page 1 of 2

Blackpool 2017

Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:07 pm
by Nick Burrows

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2017 12:02 pm
by Nick Burrows
Are Surtees and Wells playing in a different dimension? They are like 30 moves behind Mitchell - Hebden

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2017 1:11 pm
by Leonard Barden
Nick Burrows wrote:Are Surtees and Wells playing in a different dimension? They are like 30 moves behind Mitchell - Hebden
I think Peter was rather shocked by 1 e4 c5 2 Nh3?! since he took quite a while to respond. I looked on a database which suggested that 2...g6 is a TN on move 2.....! All's well that ends Wells as Black has just mated with the aid of the a1-h8 diagonal.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2017 1:47 pm
by Roger de Coverly
Leonard Barden wrote: ll's well that ends Wells as Black has just mated with the aid of the a1-h8 diagonal.
Playing Surtees is like playing Basman, you never really know what they are thinking about or how they assess positions. In the case it appears the idea was to play a Grand Prix Attack with a Knight on f2. It didn't work terribly well against straightforward play by Wells.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2017 2:48 pm
by Ian Thompson
Leonard Barden wrote:I think Peter was rather shocked by 1 e4 c5 2 Nh3?! since he took quite a while to respond.
He shouldn't have been. My database says Surtees has been playing 2.Nh3 for the last year.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:55 am
by LawrenceCooper
Surtees-Gayson began in original fashion:

1. e4 c5 2. Nh3 d5 3. Bb5 Nc6 4.Ng5 e6 5. Bxc6 bxc6 6.d3 Be7 7.Nf3 Ba6 8.Nc3 Nf6 9.e5 Nd7 10.O-O O-O 11. Re1 Rb8 12.Ne2

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:09 am
by NickFaulks
Isn't that just a normal position where White has lost two moves?

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:16 am
by LawrenceCooper
NickFaulks wrote:Isn't that just a normal position where White has lost two moves?
By the end yes, somewhat unusual around move 4 though :D

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:50 pm
by Leonard Barden
Nice tactic in Merry v Wells, destined to appear in the Evening Standard column.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 2:28 pm
by Clive Blackburn
Wells - Storey on board 1 drawn after only 3 moves on each side! :roll:

Are there no local rules at Blackpool to discourage that sort of thing?

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:04 pm
by LawrenceCooper
Clive Blackburn wrote:Wells - Storey on board 1 drawn after only 3 moves on each side! :roll:

Are there no local rules at Blackpool to discourage that sort of thing?
Clearly not. £550 each may help explain the early finish.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:54 pm
by Alex McFarlane
Wells had a tough game in the morning and only 45 minutes between rounds.

They played blitz for the plate.

Wells 2.5 Storey 0.5

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 4:57 pm
by David Robertson
Impressive knock-out by Alan Merry against my clubmate, Phil Crocker (0-1, 36). He had to see the winning lines quite a long way out

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:30 pm
by NickFaulks
Bit odd that Storey didn't have to play anyone 200+, if you don't call the last round a game.

Re: Blackpool 2017

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:41 pm
by Leonard Barden
Where are the rounds 1-4 games to be found? Only round 5 now seems to be online.